Jump to content

Goddess

Senior Member
  • Posts

    6,278
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    77

Posts posted by Goddess

  1. @Nefarious Banana

    It's interesting that this Armata Pharmaceuticals will be operating under US Department of Defense oversight and not any Public Health entities,  the same as the covid shots were.

    It's significant, because the DoD does not have to adhere to the rigorous clinical testing or quality control requirements put in place by the CDC or FDA. 

    In fact, the Pfizer whistleblower, Brooke Jackson who sued Pfizer for wrongful dismissal after getting fired for questioning the shoddy clinical trials, fraudulent data and poor quality control of the covid shots - had her case thrown out of court because the DoD came in to defend Pfizer with the argument that it was THEM, not Pfizer, who authorized the manufacturing of the shots and they did not require Pfizer to adhere to any requirements during the manufacturing of the products, nor did they require any clinical trial  proof of safety or efficacy,  so Ms. Jackson's concerns were irrelevant.

    I've been following her lawyer's substack since the time she was fired. It's very revealing. This was totally a military operation. Public Health was never involved beyond rubber-stamping authorization of the shots and providing propaganda to terrify the public into submission.

  2. On 7/19/2023 at 10:03 AM, Nefarious Banana said:

    F1RCWh4WIAIxcZi.jpg

    Debbie Birx, White House National Security advisor on covid response, who also just got shellacked in Congress for justifying her draconian stances on covid restrictions as being based on "HOPE", just got hired on as CEO of Armata Pharmaceuticals. 

    Armata is an early stage company with a rickety balance sheet so they need a sugar daddy. Or sugar uncle - as in Uncle Sam - since the US Department of Defense is partnering with them on their respiratory viruses and antibiotic-resistant  bacteria contracts.

    The revolving door keeps spinning.....

    • Thanks 1
  3. In recent months, Pfizer’s pharmacovigilance documents requested by the European Union’s drug regulator, the European Medicines Agency, have been released:

    3.PSUR-1.pdf (tkp.at)

     

    They show that Pfizer knew about a sickening level of injury early on. An August 2022 document shows that the company already had observed the following scope of vaccine injury:

    • 508,351 individual case reports of adverse events containing 1,597,673 events;
    • One-third of the AEs were classified as serious, well above the standard for safety signals usually pegged at 15%;
    • Women reported AEs at three times the rate of men;
    • 60% of cases were reported with either “outcome unknown” or “not recovered,” so many of the injuries were not transient

    Highest number of cases occurred in the 31-50 year age group (those at no risk from covid), and 92% did not have ANY comorbidities, which makes it very likely it was the vaccine causing such widespread, sudden injury.

    But a more recent document released by the Europeans is even more devastating, because it breaks down the 1.6 million adverse events observed by Pfizer by category and subcategory of ailment and injury.

    The 393 page confidential Pfizer document, dated Aug. 19, 2022, shows that Pfizer observed over 10,000 categories of diagnosis, many of them very severe and very rare.

    pfizer-report.pdf (globalresearch.ca)

    For example:

    • Pfizer was aware of 73,542 cases of 264 categories of vascular disorders from the shots. Many of them are rare conditions.
    • There were hundreds of categories of nervous system disorders, totaling 696,508 cases.
    • There were 61,518 AEs from well over 100 categories of eye disorders, which is unusual for a vaccine injury.
    • Likewise, there were over 47,000 ear disorders, including almost 16,000 cases of tinnitus, which even Mayo Clinic researchers observed as a common but often devastating side effect early on.
    • There were roughly 225,000 cases of skin and tissue disorders.
    • There were roughly 190,000 cases of respiratory disorders.
    • Disturbingly, there were over 178,000 cases of reproductive or breast disorders, including disorders you wouldn’t expect, such as 506 cases of erectile dysfunction in men.
    • Very disturbingly, there were over 77,000 psychiatric disorders observed following the shots, lending credence to Dr. Peter McCullough's research papers with case studies showing psychosis correlating with vaccination.
    • 3,711 cases of tumors – benign and malignant
    • Of course, there were almost 127,000 cardiac disorders, running the gamut of about 270 categories of heart damage, including many rare disorders, in addition to myocarditis.
    • There were over 100,000 blood and lymphatic disorders, for both of which there’s a wealth of literature linking them to the spike protein.

    When reading what Pfizer knew early on juxtaposed to independent studies, it’s clear that nobody could have mistaken most of these AEs for mere incidental ailments.

    One of the infamous cases of vaccine injury was Maddie de Garay, an Ohio teen who became disabled for life immediately after participating in the Pfizer clinical trial. I checked this confidential document and found that they knew of 68 cases of her rare diagnosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

    maddiedg.thumb.JPG.5bf62d0139303519045f5e8af31eeb63.JPG

    The broad scope of injuries affecting every single organ system is simply extraordinary. Yet to this day, the FDA continues to criminally label the Pfizer shot as safe and effective. To this day, the label indicates the shot is a fully protective vaccine and also fails to mention all of these side effects, as required by law.

    Recently, Peter Doshi, editor of the British Medical Journal, wrote a letter to the FDA requesting that the agency update its labeling to reflect the reality of what we’ve learned about the shots.

    Specifically, he asked that they include the following side effects on the label:

    • multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,
    • pulmonary embolism,
    • sudden cardiac death,
    • neuropathic and autonomic disorders,
    • decreased sperm concentration,
    • heavy menstrual bleeding,
    • and detection of vaccine mRNA in breast milk.

    The causal relationship of all these AEs to the vaccine is backed by substantial research, surveys, and adverse event reporting systems.

    As Peter Doshi stated:

    “Product labeling should be informative and accurate, not promotional. The law requires it, and following the law shouldn’t be optional.”

     

  4. ?

    CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Reveals the Agency Never Had National-Level Data Linking Vaccinations & Hospitalizations

    "At a national level we have never been able to get hospitalization, vaccination, and COVID [data]...We did not get data in aggregate on vaccination and hospitalizations. All that data that you are filling out in the EHR does not translate into public health data."

     

     

  5. The US House Oversight Committee has been working on the Wuhan lab leak controversy, and released a batch of explosive new documents, including what might be the single most important email in the long, sordid history of government covid misconduct.

    It included a Fauci email dated February 1st, 2020, that had been previously released to private FOIA requestors, but in a useless, heavily redacted form:

    redacted.thumb.jpg.bc34e2c2f24d5da550097c1940f68792.jpg

    The (b)(5) inter-agency FOIA exception (the “deliberative process privilege” that is intended to protect frank discussions between agency employees. The idea is that if government employees are constantly worrying about how their communications might look later on, they won’t be able to talk freely), doesn’t apply to the House Oversight Committee, because the Committee IS the government, and doesn’t have to use FOIA to get government documents. So the Committee got from the NIH an unreacted version of the same email, and guess what?

    It immediately became perfectly obvious what Fauci was hiding:

    unredacted.thumb.jpg.642b4ed6d7e89a6d1d88dc6c5a4d793f.jpg

    "The suspicion was heightened by the fact that scientists in Wuhan University are known to have been working on gain-of-function experiments to determine the molecular mechanisms associated with bat viruses adapting to human infection, and the outbreak originated in Wuhan."

    “The FACT” that scientists in Wuhan “ARE known” — known, not “suspected” — and HOW did they know? — known to be working on gain-of-function research … on what? BAT VIRUSES, that’s what. That sentence proves Fauci and the rest of that colorful group of mobsters knew BEFORE FEBRUARY 1ST 2020 about the gain-of-function bat work in Wuhan, yet they spent three years denying that singular, critically-important fact, and then bribing, threatening, cajoling and making life absolutely miserable for anyone and everyone who dared asked questions.

     

    But instead of focusing their collective health agency resources on that singularly critical FACT, they decided to lie about it.  Many of us wouldn’t be surprised if the government’s massive censorship operation didn’t begin life specifically to protect THIS particular whopper.

    This coverup is literally a million times worse than the cholera epidemic the United Nations caused in Haiti and then lied about for six years.

    How many deaths could have been prevented if we knew it was not a “novel” virus at all, but a human-engineered bioweapon, and didn’t waste thousands of research hours looking in all the wrong places?

  6. Israel’s largest healthcare organization, representing over half of the country’s population, Clalit Health Services, reported alarming new diagnosis data.

    ‘Cardiac arrest’ diagnoses per million more than doubled, increasing an unbelievable +225% in one year from 2021 to 2022. Even more astounding, the use of the diagnosis code in Israel is up a chart-bursting +431% from 2020:

    israelcardiac.thumb.jpg.35f8a3c7fafa383f7a58cd7d27c97adb.jpg

    Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla previously dubbed it “the world’s laboratory” for mRNA covid jabs. That’s because Israel rashly volunteered to be Pfizer’s test country, which let it get the jabs before anyone else, but required its unfortunate citizens to join in the world’s only country-wide “herd immunity” trial. As a result, Israel imposed strict mandates, including a vaccine passport.

  7. A Positive Covid Milestone - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

     

    This quote was disturbing, regarding "covid" deaths:

    The official number is probably an exaggeration because it includes some people who had virus when they died even though it was not the underlying cause of death. Other C.D.C. data suggests that almost one-third of official recent Covid deaths have fallen into this category. A study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases came to similar conclusions.

    Saying that covid deaths were exaggerated used to be the darkest kind of disinformation, and would promptly get you cancelled from social media. Plus if you said it, you would literally and instantly kill grandma, making you the most deplorable sort of criminal. 

    Haha.

    Forgive and forget, right?

    Haha. Haha.

  8. Well, this is quite astounding:

    McGill University and Moderna to expand collaborations with new projects in Lipid Nanoparticle research | Newsroom - McGill University

    It describes two research projects. Take a look at project #2.

    It is “a study to characterize LNPs so that their specific size and payload distribution may be better understood“. 

    The announcement also admits that “Standard techniques cannot simultaneously quantify the size and payload of individual LNPs, and thus often only averages are measured that mask individual variation and mask the relationship between size and payload.“.

    In other words, the real dose of mRNAs being delivered in each shot is NOT KNOWN, particularly across different batches.

    This is an open admission that one person can potentially receive a very different dose than another, regardless of the ‘average’ dose stated on the vial.

    Never before has there been a global rollout of a drug where physicians are unable to accurately administer defined doses.  ("Trust your doctor!!")

    Finally, The results [of the study] will guide the optimization of LNP manufacturing and could be used for quality control for the manufacture of mRNA-based vaccines.

    Should there not have been an adequate understanding of the biodistribution of these LNPs PRIOR to a global rollout? 

    Should this optimization and development of a proper quality control system not have been done PRIOR to a global rollout?

    Bottom line:

    Basic things like understanding where a drug goes in the body and how to optimize quality control oversight of its manufacturing and standardize its dosing - should have been done extensively and satisfactorily more than two years ago.

    And anyways, independent scientists and researchers have already answered these questions - the LNPs collect in major organs like the heart and lungs, the ovaries and testes.  They cross the blood-brain barrier.

    And we already know that the shots can give one person zero dosage and another person 7,000 times the dosage.

  9. 2023 is proving to be more deadly worldwide than 2020.

    Yet, no outcry.  No panic.  No response.

     

    Alberta:  (pop. 4.3 million)

    625 excess deaths in the first 18 weeks of 2020

    2,090 excess deaths in same period of 2023

    That's 3 and half times as many.

    BC:  (pop. 5.3 million)

    315 excess deaths in the first 18 weeks of 2020

    1,895 excess deaths in same period of 2023

    That's 6 times as many.

    Saskatchewan:  (pop. 1.17 million)

    50 excess deaths in the first 13 weeks of 2020

    460 excess deaths in same period of 2023

    That's 9 times as many.

    data3.thumb.jpg.6c292ed5136df798dfdda0b62acd0370.jpg

     

    data4.thumb.jpg.d6595f245698d37f8254c8374ddb5d0f.jpg

     

    data5.thumb.jpg.abe4041212f5044c9593d45b30238132.jpg

     

     

  10.  
    Guillain Barré Syndrome: Explained: Peru declares health emergency after rise in Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases; here are the signs of this neurological disorder | The Times of India (indiatimes.com)
     
     
    A run-away "neurological" disorder.....   Huh.  
     
    And the #2 adverse event after vaccination (cardiac issues being #1) is........neurological disorders.
     
    Huh. 
     
    On July 8th, the Peruvian government declared a nationwide health emergency after an explosion in cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The state of emergency will last for 90 days as officials tackle the “unusual increase” in cases.
     
    Good luck, Peru!  Pfizer thanks you for your patronage!
     
    image.png
     

     

  11. 4 hours ago, Moonbox said:

     

    You don't know anything about science.  ?

    Apparently I know more than you because, BASED ON SCIENCE STUDIES, I've said from the beginning that the jabs would not prevent transmission or infection, that lockdowns would be far more harmful than covid, etc.

    Feel free to share the scientific studies you've found that say lockdowns were great and the jabs prevent transmission and infection. 

    Good luck.

    You're going to need it.

    And you're 67 pages of science BEHIND.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  12.  

     

    Covid Censorship Proved to Be Deadly - WSJ

    The author sensibly pointed out that forbidding doctors from recommending effective alternative treatments and hiding the fact of recovered immunity is not only unethical and droolingly moronic but led to countless preventable deaths:

    Legions of doctors stayed quiet after witnessing the demonization of their peers who challenged the Covid orthodoxy. A little censorship leads people to watch what they say. Millions of patients and citizens were deprived of important insights as a result… Excess mortality in most high-income nations was worse in 2021 and 2022 than in 2020, the initial pandemic year. Many poorer nations with less government control seemed to fare better. Sweden, which didn’t have a lockdown, performed better than nearly every other advanced nation.

    The article quoted Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman, who in 1969 famously said “Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” Truer words were never spoken. 

    So I guess all us of contrarians were doing science all along.

  13.  
     

    The article described two substantial new analyses of near-universal lockdown policies enacted in every country but one (Sweden, the control group). Both reports concluded lockdown policy made little or no difference in saving lives, but had massive destructive effects.

    The first analysis was published in book form, after researchers reviewed over twenty thousand separate studies. Think about that number, twenty thousand. That is a LOT of lockdown studies. The book, authored by three respected economists and published last month, was simply titled, “Did Lockdowns Work?”

    The answer is no.

    Sadly, mainstream media, having sold its soul for twenty pieces of silver during the pandemic, largely remains silent. For now. 

    And the CDC is suicidally sticking to its lockdown guidance, along with the W.H.O., which is still pushing them, hard, in its odious new “pandemic treaty.”

    Which means the next time they try this - and they will - we must not comply.

  14.  
     

    The dam holding back vaccine injury data was broken open yesterday when the world’s premier medical journal dipped a toe into the vaccine injury pool.

    Yesterday — the 5th of July — the Lancet published a preprint titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination.” The review’s nine authors included Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health, Paul Alexander, who worked at the Department of Health and Human Services during the pandemic, and top-published cardiac researcher Peter McCullough.

    Researchers reviewed 678 individual studies — all of the published autopsy reports they could find — collapsing those into 44 papers describing 325 autopsy cases and one tissue study. To make the final cut, three physicians independently reviewed each death to determine whether it would have been the safe and effective covid vaccination that killed the patient.

    Of those 325 cases, 73.9% were determined by a majority of the three reviewing doctors to have been caused by the shots in full or in part. Timing was critical to the diagnosis: folks in the study group killed by the jabs died on average two weeks following the first shot, three weeks after the second shot, and one week after the third shot.

    Unsurprisingly, the two largest groups of organs injured by the shots were the heart (the cardiac organ) and the blood (hematological systems), which includes strokes, clotting, and so forth. 

    They concluded that the evidence strongly suggested a causal link between the jabs and the deaths:

    The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.
    … Criteria of causality from an epidemiological perspective have been met, including biological plausibility, temporal association, internal and external validity, coherence, analogy, and reproducibility with each successive report of death after COVID-19 vaccination.

    By necessity, this paper only looked at acute (sudden) deaths that occurred soon enough after vaccination to provoke an autopsy. Because of the authors’ desire to firmly link jabs to deaths by “temporal proximity” (closeness in time), their review excluded longer-term causes like turbo cancers or delayed strokes and heart attacks.

    That may be why, at the end of their paper, the authors brought up the large, unexplained numbers of baffling excess deaths, as additional evidence shoring up their conclusions:

    The large number of COVID-19 vaccine induced deaths evaluated in this review is consistent with multiple papers that report excess mortality after vaccination. Pantazatos and Seligmann found that all-cause mortality increased 0-5 weeks post-injection in most age groups resulting in 146,000 to 187,000 vaccine-associated deaths in the United States between February and August of 2021.
    With similar findings, Skidmore estimated that 278,000 people may have died from the COVID-19 vaccine in the United States by December 2021. These concerning results were further elucidated by Aarstad and Kvitastein, who found that among 31 countries in Europe, a higher population COVID-19 vaccine uptake in 2021 was positively correlated with increased all-cause mortality in the first nine months of 2022 after controlling for alternative explanations.
    Furthermore, excess mortality from non-COVID-19 causes has been detected in many countries since the mass vaccination programs began, suggesting a common deleterious exposure among populations. Pantazatos estimated that VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20. If we apply this underreporting factor to the May 5th, 2023, VAERS death report count of 35,324, the number of deaths in the United States alone becomes 706,480. If this extrapolated number of deaths were to be confirmed, the COVID-19 vaccines would represent the largest medical failure in human history.

    Between shrinking estimates of covid deaths (because of over-diagnosis many countries are now deleting supposed "covid" deaths), and increasing evidence of jab-caused mortality, we are now well on the way to proving that the jabs killed more people than covid.

    I’d like to remind you of what Eric Rubin said in 2021, just before voting to approve the shots for kids. Rubin is the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, a professor at Harvard, and sits on the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory committee. In October of 2021, to persuade his committee colleagues to vote in favor of shots for kids, Rubin infamously said:

    “We’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is [for children] unless we start giving it. … I do think we should vote to approve it.”

    Dr. McCullough explained, “That statement will go down as the most reckless, as the most reprehensible scientific statement in the history of medical bioethics."

  15. Here's 4 from June 2023 for you:
    Imagine how many "unfamous" deaths there are.
     
     
    1.
    Katarina Pavelek, a 41-year-old actress who decided to take her own life after suffering from vaccine side effects. She chose to end her life in Switzerland on the 2nd of June after being diagnosed with an untreatable chronic neurological illness caused by the booster jab.  Her last message on Instagram:
     
    image.png
    2.
    The Gold Coast Marathon just concluded yesterday, and reports are that two marathon runners collapsed, and one has died in the hospital.
     
     
    Let's examine the data from a study conducted by the American Heart Association that examines the number of cardiac arrests experienced by marathon runners.
     
    The study analyzed long-distance race records in the United States from January 1, 2001, to May 31, 2010. According to the findings, there was an incidence of 0.54 cardiac arrests per 100,000 runners, meaning approximately 1 in 180,000 marathon runners experienced cardiac arrest:
     

    In yesterday's Gold Coast Marathon, which had approximately 6,500 participants, two incidents of cardiac arrest were reported. This translates to a ratio of 1 in 3,250.

    The disparity between 1 in 3,250 and 1 in 180,000 is significant.

    3.

    So, did Oscar Cabrera die because of the vaccines?

    image.png

     

    Let the man speak for himself:

    This was his post on Facebook, translated into English: (I had to adjust the swears so this would post.)

    “I got a d**m Myocarditis from putting a fuquing vaccine. (I got 2 doses of Pfizer) And I knew it! Many people warned me. But guess that? It was compulsory or I couldn't work. I am an international professional athlete and I am playing in Spain. I have no health problem, nothing, not hereditary, no asthma, NOTHING! I suddenly collapsed to the ground in the middle of a match and almost died. I'm still recovering and I've had 11 different cardiology tests done and guess? They find nothing. I have no cholesterol, no fat, nothing! 7% body fat 93% muscle. When they give me the diagnosis, they tell me that I won't be able to play for at least 5 months until my heart goes down again and they can't give me that medicine"

    4.

    The death of Joesthetics, also known as Jo Linder, sent shockwaves through the bodybuilding and fitness community yesterday. He was only 30 years old.

     
      https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.ama
    However, the main point wasn't about steroids at all. Joe conducted an interview 2-3 weeks prior to his sudden death, in which he described his personal health anomalies after receiving the vaccines. This included discussing his blood work and other related details. Essentially, he has all the evidence to support the presence of blood anomalies after vaccination. What more could you ask for? 
     
    According to the National Cancer Institute, plasmapheresis is commonly performed to eliminate excessive antibodies, abnormal proteins, or other harmful substances from the blood.
     
     
     
    Today on MSM, there was a photo gallery of almost 200 famous people who have died recently. I noted many heart attacks in 20-30 year olds and many "died suddenly at homes".
    The excess mortality is not slowing down.
  16. And this is why people like Eyeball keep falling back to "But I don't know anyone who had an adverse reaction, so therefore adverse reactions don't exist."

    Privy Council advocated downplaying COVID vaccine injuries or deaths | Toronto Sun

    The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”

     

  17. I posted this paper before when it first came out, and it still has not been challenged:

    Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - ScienceDirect

    Shows COVID vaccine has 1/800 severe adverse event rate.

    Rotavirus vaccine was pulled from market for 1/10,000 adverse events

    Swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1/100,000 - after only 50 deaths.

    As far as vaccines go, the COVID vaccine adverse event rate is historically extremely, extremely high.

     

    The egregious part was the government knew the AE rate was high (they had the most comprehensive and current data), and they mandated it for populations they knew weren’t at risk of severe outcomes.

    The original risk analysis held true. Healthy young people were NEVER at serious risk. Generally speaking, healthy people were never at risk. That was true at the beginning, and it is still true today.

×
×
  • Create New...