WestCanMan

No, I don't even know Goddess, let alone anyone in her family who would have my contact info. 

Where's the post by eyeball? 

I never heard anything about it. I don't know her personally. Who's saying that she was murdered?

Hey stupid, you're the one who is trying to change your story from "a molotov in a truck a few miles away... OMG they almost conquered the USA!" to "a bunch of molotovs and rifles right at the riot that no one talked about until Sept 2023."

You don't care about actual molotovs thrown at actual people by BLM, but you wanna lecture me about napalm (who else has ever used that on humans aside from the US?) because someone might have had one molotov in a truck a few miles away. 

Why didn't CNN talk about all of these 'rifles' and 'molotovs' two years ago? Why is there no video showing anyone with rifles or molotovs at the riot? They're not hard to spot. 

The fact that I don't believe you has nothing to do with Trump or being a conservative: your stories are just idi0tic bullsh1t. I don't know whether you're more of a liar or a stooge. 

It's your story, dumbass. You're the one who said

Quote

Molotov cocktails were discovered in a puck up truck registered to one of the same people you claim were non violent

That was your lone molotov cocktail claim until today, not mine. Were you also too busy at "the Trump breakfast club" to know about the shiny new "12 molotov story", jackass? 

Guess what else, dimwit. No one is accused of throwing them. Do you know the difference between possessing them and lighting them and throwing them? One is bad, the other is worse.

But who'd do that, right? 

You probably don't know, because you spent your entire life in the "head up Anderson Cooper's ass breakfast club" so I'll tell you... BLM rioters, that's who.  

Yup, people didn't just "possess" molotov cocktails at BLM riots, they lit molotov cocktails and threw them at cops. They also shot fireworks at cops. BLMers also ambushed cops and killed multiple officers on more than one occasion. They also captured a retarded white kid and tortured him, and they live-streamed that on FB because they thought that it was cool.

Do ya have a lecture about "what it's like to be hit with napalm" for the pro-BLMers like Barack f'ing Obama, his violent wife, and the PM of Canada? I think you don't. I think your big yap is suddenly silent.

I actually think that you contribute to Kamala's "Violent Rioter Bail Fund" to get those types out of jail. 

Did you show outrage about the violent BLM riots Caswell, or are you just a stupid hypocrite? Did you go along with the "Gentle Giant M Brown" narrative Caswell?

Did you go along with the "Floyd's killing was definitely racism" narrative Caswell? Because white-ass Tony Timpa was killed the exact same way, over the course of 13 minutes, and the cops were laughing (there's video of Tony's murder too, but almost no one bothered to watch). At least no one was laughing when they killed G Floyd. Oh, and the cops managed to hide the evidence of how Timpa died for 6 months. Everyone thought that he died at the hospital that whole time. That takes a lot of co-conspirators to keep that lie alive for 6 months.

Tony Timpa was dead as a doornail right there on the sidewalk and never lived a second past that point.

Oh wait, there's still more... the guys who "racistly" murdered Tony Timpa.... are still cops. No jailtime, they weren't even fired. They weren't even taken off of active duty. If you go to the wrong city, you might get pulled over by a cop who G-Floyded a guy to death, and that guy can look down his nose at you for going 5 mph over the speed limit.

Hit the skids, Caswell, you're a partisan goof without a shred of decency in you. 

Dude, you originally claimed

Quote

"Molotov cocktails were discovered in a puck up truck registered to one of the same people you claim were non violent"

now there were 12 in the crowd... 

Now there a bunch of rifles?

Why did no one ever hear of this 'til now? 

GFYS.

1)The reason that I'm talking about "guns" is because leftards are talking about "an attempt to overthrow the gov't", and it's kinda hard for that to be a real thing if not even one person brought a gun. 

No one would plan to overthrow the US gov't and say "Next week, when a couple hundred of us attack the capitol, we'll just grab rocks and fire extinguishers and other things that are lying around and that should be enough to overcome all of the security forces there. No one will know that we are coming, the NSA, FBI and CIA aren't smart enough to be onto us."

2) And if it really was an attempt to overthrow the gov't, as leftards like to pretend, and "it's so obvious that it was an insurrection because there was so much chatter about attacking the capitol in the days and weeks before it happened", HOW DID THE US GOVERNMENT GET CAUGHT WITH THEIR PANTS DOWN?

Look how many cops there are between the "seditious mobs" [sic] and the capitol... Pelosi may as well have scattered rose petals along the sidewalk and put a big ribbon on the Senate.

3) What you're actually doing by cataloguing the different cases of "assault with a deadly weapon" (fire extinguisher, stick, etc) is making the case that the FBI are playing this up, because when 60 SS agents were injured protecting the WH in May 2020 only 1 person was arrested. https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/george-floyd-protests-05-31-20/h_cb459ab077b164295d8d61d80987e3fb

How can there be an attack on the WH with 60 SS agents injured and only 1 person gets arrested?

I'm pretty sure that if I was to attempt to get into the WH tomorrow and I slapped a cop "my white privilege ass" would end up in jail for a long time, even if they weren't injured at all. 

4) Molotov cocktails were found in a truck miles away....OMG!!!!!

Are you effing kidding me? Molotov cocktails were throw at cops hundreds of times during the BLM riots. Fireworks were shot in their faces. Leftards didn't give a shit. Now you suddenly care about molotov cocktails found miles away in a truck? Do you understand how that makes me think that you're a total effing idi0t? It seems like incontrovertible evidence, doesn't it?

Buddy, the FBI are every bit as politically active as the KGB in Russia were. To pretend that there is a difference is to resign yourself to one-party rule. 

No, it's not ok at all if they had guns. And from everything that we knew for the first 6 months, there were zero guns.

Now leftists are trying to say that there were guns there and there is a lot of nuance to that suggestion:

1) Because leftists are saying it, it's almost certainly a lie. We listened to their Russian collusion horror stories for years after we knew they were all lies. We witnessed the lies about the BSL4 lab, Sandman, G Floyd, M Brown, peaceful protests, the "Russian disinformation laptop", the Whitmer trial, the sudden invention of election denial in 2020, Dr Ford's credibility, E Jean Caroll's credibility, the Ukraine war, the Afghanistan debacle, vaccines, Dr Fauci, Cuomo's euthanasia wards, etc, etc, etc. You guys have a track record for bald-faced lying about every topic under the sun that has anything to do with politics. 

Of course I know that you're lying about the topic of "guns at the capitol". It's not in your leftist DNA to tell the truth about anything - you'd break out in hives.

2) There's a huge difference between: "We believe that some of those people probably had guns there because their guns were in their car 3 days later when they were arrested", and "people used guns during their attack on the capitol". 

The fact remains that no one, not even alt-left lying drivel media, had any evidence of guns for months after the almost entirely peaceful and joyous celebration of democracy - that means that guns were absolutely not a factor. If anyone had a gun, it wasn't used in that mostly peaceful event: it wasn't brandished as a threat and it wasn't fired.

3) By your own admission, people only used impromptu weapons. Do you understand the significance of your own admission? It means that people didn't bring weapons there because they didn't plan to be slightly unruly on that day. 

They didn't have a single gun in that crowd, period. If someone thinks that they found out about a gun that might have been there 2 years after the fact that's still not the same thing as a gun that someone brandished or fired. And I say peacefully in the EXACT same way that leftists say that the BLM protests were 'mostly peaceful' for 3 years - in case you don't follow... the vast majority of the people who came to the almost entirely peaceful and joyous celebration of democracy didn't do anything violent. That's your standard which all leftists rigidly defended as accurate, now you suddenly don't like it.

The PM of Canada even cited the BLM protests as an example of peaceful protest, and he did it while comparing the violent BLM riots with billions of dollars in damages, thousands of assaults and many people murdered to the Freedom Convoy where not even one window was smashed, no one even stole a bag of chips, no one threw so much as a paper airplane at police officers, and they didn't even burn a small pile of leaves let alone someone's business or home. 

Trump never ordered protesters to take ober congress, that's another lie. 

Again, there were no guns in the crowd that attacked. None. You are lying again. 

If a pic shows up of some random dudes at a Trudeau rally wearing a new type of islamic state shirt does that make Trudeau a terrorist?

It does, right? 100%. 

I wouldn’t even know what a 6MNEW shirt was. If someone sat beside me wearing one I wouldn’t think anything of it. 
 

That whole shirt story is just another example of an MSM lie that completely sucked you in. You completely lack the ability to think for yourself Buber. If Don Lemon said “BOO” you’d instantly believe in ghosts. 

No, the topic is CNN's lying, which was proven. Thanks for fessing up Buber.

If some clowns show up at a Trump rally that's for their own reasons. Maybe they hate terrorism and they don't like the fact that every time there's a muslim terrorist attack the Dems downplay it. Maybe they're not even who they're pretending to be. If you need to know why there are people there with shirts on, go ask them.

You can't make assumptions about why they're there though. Chances are that you're wrong when you speculate Buber.

For example, leftists are so god-damned stupid that they assumed America's most seditious criminal was at the Trump rally because he considers himself to be some kind of activist/journalist (CNN even called hm a left-wing activist although he's known to be a violent criminal). 

Here's a video of Sullivan trying to convince a mob of losers (left-wing activists) to violently remove Trump from power.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13758071/john-sullivan-brother-speaks-out-capitol-arrest/

Sullivan's own brother calls him sick, he's known to be a treasonous snake, but to CNN he's an activist.

Leftists are hideous dude. Anyone who has respect for CNN is just a worthless piece of crap.

Why don't you address the topic at hand Buber?

Now's the time. 

Either that or admit that CNN was lying, just like I said.

We both know I'm correct and that you don't have a leg to stand on. 

You can change the topic later, once you've admitted that Lemon was being a complete douchebag and that the Dems are cozy with anti-Semitism.

(I've heard the BS about white supremacists being a terrorist threat, but the vast majority of the terrorist attacks that happened in the US were by muslims or whatever anti-conservative groups attacked a couple of country and western concerts. And FYI Antifa and CNN can easily plant people at Trump rallies with shirts that say whatever they want, just for a photo op, much like Antifa had a guy at the mostly peaceful protest at Capitol Hill to incite rioting. 

You know who I'm talking about, right? The guy who CNN pumped up on national TV who has a website dedicated to sedition. John Sullivan.)

I didn't get that far into the video. Only a complete moron watch Don Lemon talk for that long. 

Here's the thing Buber. Don Lemon's rant wasn't about hate speech in America. It wasn't about the shooting. It was solely to tie Trump in with the anti-Semitism which was the main reason for the shooting. When Don Lemon knows that Trump is the exact opposite of an anti-Semite he should not be pushing that false narrative, at all. It's morally repugnant and disgusting. The fact that you're cozy with that is just a sad testament to where your level of integrity is at Buber.

Lemon: "Trump's not welcome in Pennsylvania today". "We need bridges, not walls", blah, blah, blah. 

This is exactly the same thing that CNN did with the Pulse Nightclub shooting. "This isn't an islam thing, the fact that the shooter praised allah while he was murdering gay people in Florida's largest terrorist attack ever was a red herring. This is about Republican hate speech and gun laws." There were 10,000 people at a march in NYC a week later, behind a big banner that said "Republican hate kills". Talk about spitting on someone's grave, those worthless pieces of shit blamed the murders of 50 people on a group that had nothing to do with it, just for their own political gain. If you and your spouse are murdered is it cool if CNN blames your son for it if it was his music teacher? 

FYI if Lemon was on TV to address the topic of anti-Semitism within politics then the first topic to be discussed would be the DNC's close ties with Louis Farrakhan.

Did you recall that the picture of Obama smiling and chilling with Farrakhan was released earlier that year?  

There's only been one mass murder of Jews that I can think of in the US ever since I've been alive. Is it just a coincidence that it happened in the same year that Obama was shown to be Farrakhan's friend?

Did Lemon mention that? 

I said CNN are despicable irredeemable liars and fabricators and we both know it's true. You are just in lock step with them.

It's not really your fault if you guys don't understand how this works. Maybe it's just something that requires above average intelligence. 

I'm starting to think that you really believe the things that you are saying. 

Just for future reference, inferring that someone did something when you know that they didn't, just because you don't like them, is the same as lying.

If I quoted someone who said 'sapper/Buber is qanon' and then had a discussion about the merits of that argument, while leaving out information that would prove the accusation false, while knowing for certain that it was untrue, that would be the same as lying.

That's just a fact. If you don't get it, too bad. It's how honesty works. Don't worry about trying to incorporate that kind of thing in your repertoire. 

That's just blatantly stupidity Buber. I guess that's why it suits you.

23 hrs ago. 

Quote

Of course you're full of shit.  It's no trick at all to assume that. 

Unless... 

If you had some justification for your anger a swearword might fit in, but you're just making a baseless accusation there.

You wanted an example of CNN inferring that Trump's anti-Semitism was to blame. You got it. Now you're acting like Lemon's stupidity was good enough. It's not. Go fish.

FYI your baseless insults, replete with swearwords, are childish sap.

There's nothing wrong with me calling Buber out for dodging/yakking when he should be 'splaining.

Saying that 'Don Lemon is just a huge idiot and that's his honest opinion' isn't the same as 'proving that CNN didn't lie'. 

Buber you have lots of accusations of CNN lies to disprove if you want. Stop whining and get off your lazy or lying arse.

I cited an op-ed showing a prominent CNN talking head trying to make the case that Trump's anti-Semitism was the most likely reason for a mass murder. It was extreme stupidity at the very best, but if we're being honest it was just a false & malicious narrative.

Can you find a prominent CNN talking head trying to make the case that the Demonrats and their virulent anti-Semite pal Louis Farrakhan provided motivation for that mass murder? It makes much more sense than "A guy murdered a bunch of Jews because he was following the lead of the guy who apparently loves Jews". 

You're being intentionally ignorant right now Buber. No one is as stupid as you're pretending to be. You wouldn't be able to spell 'no' if you were that dumb. 

You just lied again.

1) I wasn't thinking when I asked you to describe the article lol. WTH was I thinking.

2) If Fox did lie back in 2016, that's one lie in the last 5 years. You're down by 50,000.

1) Your article is behind the paywall of one of the MSM companies that was successfully sued by a teenager for libel Bubber. What does it say? (and why are you able to view NYT articles? Do you pay a company like that money for access to their 'news'?)

2) Who cares if it's "Don Lemon's opinion"? Is telling despicable lies about the President a good way to get fired or is it business as usual at CNN? (It's the one that I underlined).

Exactly. 

(You're never going to understand what I was implying so I'll spell it out for you - if you have made so many childish insults, accompanied by swearwords, that you don't know which one I'm referring to, that's a sad commentary on your posts.) 

Quote

 To what childish insult are you referring, exactly?

Exactly.

Sapper, FYI, you can still make childish insults without using swearwords.