drummindiver

Your post males no sense He was pointing out how ridiculous M103 is, not Islam. Not allowed dissent on opinion s on Islam now?

I do disagree. Lots of hate speech going on in schools..

"Most scientists believe" is certainly not statistical. Especially when the stats he had just given proved otherwise. Too bad you didn't have your TV back in 1933 to watch all those AGW hurricanes hit.

Yes, "given the politics". Every study showing 97% refuted. If he were alive, you could ask Dr Bill Gray what happens when you don't play the politics of consensus. BTW, the statement you quoted was anecdotal, while every other point was statistical.

We have multiple studies showing nothing of the sort. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425232/97-percent-solution-ian-tuttle

Michael, his methodology is wrong. The numbers aren't correct. And if you've been involved in science you know replicating in the lab doesn't equate to replicating in the real world. https://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=820

Of course. And cooling. But not AGW.

Methodology is pretty important stuff. Especially when you're looking at trillions of dollars. Cooks paper should be retracted as Serallini's was. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/121128

You don't even know own what you're talking about...as usual. BTW, I always provide cites.

Your citing his conclusion based on faulty procedures.

No, he posted a reward for others spewing hate speech. That is not hate speech. "Though he carried on fights with various public figures (and even ran for mayor of Mississauga in 2014) he focused much of his attention on schools, which he accused of “indoctrinating” students with Islamic ideology. In one video, he offered a bounty — first $1,000, later increased to $2,500 — to anyone who filmed a Muslim student in a Mississauga school “spewing hate speech during Friday prayers".

Show me an example of true xenophobia. a la Ernst Zundel. You can't. If you think this passes the test and is hate, not free speech, then you shouldn't be voicing your opinion. BTW, I may think buddy is a nut job, but he should have freedom of speech. http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/notorious-mississauga-blogger-known-for-anti-muslim-rants-faces-hate-crime-charge

Yeah, no retaliation for nuclear attack on Canada. Some things you don't turn the other cheek.

Breaking the law is beside the point. Now this. ^^^ What kind of spiral logic going on here.

Pretty much the whole point. Don't break the law. I know as a progressive you won't support that.

Just like you called all out righties on "that other forum" that don't agree with you. Most ppl do equate the term with being easily offended. That is why it was coined and applied to leftists.

Oh my. You weren't joking.

Lol. You are joking, right?

Also @Michael Hardner Here is the actual paper. Please refute anything Epstein wrote. Use my proper handle Hudson Jones. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/meta