Jump to content

Derek 2.0

Senior Member
  • Posts

    8,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Derek 2.0

  1. Far from it, I ignore the vast majority of the member's posts (likewise several other members), namely due to lack of interest in both their contributions and/or no desire to converse on the given topical thread, with topics I have interest in, I will often converse with most....inversely, said member (or anyone else) is free to ignore my posts. As the site moderator has said numerous times, ignore it and report it.....really simple concept.
  2. You're preaching to the choir to an extent........my wife drives a Tesla sedan and we're currently building a "green home", but such things are far from cheap...... natural market forces, one day, will drive further green technology to the mainstream, but we're far from there yet......hence the need for cheap fossil fuels......
  3. Oh I agree, people lose interest and come and go (or go for good)......such is life, if though for example, a member left because of posts by BC2004, when not for him they would have stayed, I would question why the ignore feature wasn't used.
  4. Just in the last several days, BC2004 hasn't responded once to you, all the while, you insult him (which is against the forum rules)......likewise, your off-topic exchange with Argus several days prior, which resulted in CA issuing a collective warning.......what exactly are you doing? Like they say about those that live in glass houses......... It would seem, as pointed out by the site moderator, if you have issues with members Argus and BC2004 you should ignore them.......like they, and many others, often do with you.
  5. Sure I do.......In this very thread, what is the ratio of posts acknowledged and replied too between member BC2004 and yourself? There is your distracting troll.....
  6. I'm sure that it will once Green Energy can compete on a larger scale with fossil fuels.....
  7. My vote for best post of 2015 You could add fascist to bigot and racist though........
  8. I disagree, BC 2004 has been a member for years and like other members, has seen posters come and go....in my view, the flooding of tin-foil hats and "multiple IP account people" (I like that by the way) are far more offensive and/or off-putting than BC2004 on his worse 4th of July parade.
  9. Clearly, as often stated by them, we don't subscribe to their religious beliefs........seems simple enough.
  10. Good to know........from searching the CRA site, it would seem that to be the case.
  11. Once said alternatives are cheaper than Middle Eastern crude, I fully agree. The result of Middle East tensions then will clearly be indifference from the rest of the World, much like is shown towards most of Africa.
  12. Clearly us.......hence jihad.
  13. Sure, likewise energy fracked or from tarsands.......
  14. And to replace the regions current strongmen with themselves..........if Allah wills it so I suppose.
  15. I certainly don't blame ourselves for their savagery.
  16. Sure, but can they then hate our freedoms even more? Surely even the jihadists that wear the big-boy pants understand the importance of Middle Eastern oil........
  17. Furthermore, from the new tax changes: I wish they had the TFSA 30 years ago....... One question though: Does that include members of a volunteer fire department that also performs SAR? Or is there already a tax credit for such members?
  18. Of which, political power grows from........
  19. Agreed.......that is until our economies are fueled by recycled hemp and the laughter of children
  20. It appears that due to polls, Trudeau is now leaving the door open to whipping out supporting an extension of the current Iraq mission........
  21. Thats why cake was invented
  22. Somewhat misleading article in the OP, as the police within Harris County have hardly been replaced by armed Mall Ninjas....
  23. I agree, but I don't doubt Clinton could prove a challenge.......but then again, her record has yet to be fully examined by the public.
  24. I agree, I think the top of the ticket will be either Bush (likely) or Christie (maybe), with the eventual bottom half being Walker or Rubio....
  25. No, the Soviet nuclear weapons program began during the War.
×
×
  • Create New...