WestCoastRunner

Dare I say "try black, you never go back". Joking, joking! Just wanted to add some humour.

Again, you only need to look at the returns of those financially successful movies that don't have lead white male roles to understand that your statement is simply not true. This again goes back to my 'leaving money on the table'. I don't disagree that films with white male leads are a money maker but so are others. Hence the 'money left on the table'.

And the schlock comes mostly from the 90% white men who call the shots. The occasional gem comes from an indie film

I am addressing Hal's statement.

No I'm not. You only need to look at the movies being produced by white men.

I couldn't find the energy to respond to his post. Glad you called him out on it. Kudos.

You are playing into the stereotypes of movie watchers. Women only like romance and don't like action movies? Men don't like romance? You insult all movie goers.Btw. I watched Selma, 12 years a slave etc. But, how could that be. I'm a white female.

Hal, do you know what "leaving money on the table" means? Check out the returns on creed, straight outta Compton, and other female directed movies.

No they don't. And they aren't reaching as far as they can with women either. Seriously, this is a no brainer.

Hispanics and African-Americans make up more than half of frequent movie goers. They most certainly are leaving money on the table.Especially when over 90% of the decision makers in Hollywood are white men.

I know that. Tell that to argus. Rolls eyes.

Little old me is badgering you? I need to say a magic word in asking for further clarification? Doesn't this go against forum rules? Why should I need to ask for further clarification to respond to your post? Because, clearly I am stumped as to how to respond to it, which is why I'm asking for more information. Are you refusing to offer more information so I can intellectually respond to your post?

Little old me is badgering you? I need to say a magic word in asking for further clarification? Doesn't this go against forum rules? Why should I need to ask for further clarification to respond to your post? Because, clearly I am stumped as to how to respond to it, which is why I'm asking for more information. Are you refusing to offer more information so I can intellectually respond to your post?

Yea I was agreeing .

Why won't you expand on this?

Hillary has a long career working on family issues, pro bono etc. If anyone wants to dig a little deeper they will see she has always been a champion for human rights.

BTw, you have just reinforced my point about border guards not being experts on the integrity of our immigration system.

I know what report argus is citing. He's restating a quote from the article he linked to.However, you are right. Border guards being thugs deserve its own thread.

Right. Got it. I am being held at a higher bar.

Really? As opposed to other dumb things being posted here? Why aren't you calling out other posters for saying dumb things?

I'm surprised there hasn't been more media coverage on his trump university.

You continue to post your outlandish opinions with no facts to back you up.

Many of these marriages are pre-arranged. They don't meet and fall in love. These aren't marriages contrived from Mexican vacations.

Really? Those thugs at the border.

Can you expand further?