WestCoastRunner

These gag orders would prevent the victim from talking to anyone, even a hotline for sexual assault victims, let alone the police. The campus needs to be made aware of the sexual assault claim in order to impose suspensions etc if the claims are found to be true.

I don't even get what your OP is about. Are you in agreement of this contract they have to sign or against it?

Universities are in the business of protecting their brand and future endowments so they will do whatever is necessary to achieve that. The following are statistics from the documentary "The Hunting Ground". While it is based on campuses in the United States, they are reflective of the issues here in Canada as well. So, BC, save your post for another thread.

And do what? Seriously? If a student sexually assaulted your daughter what would you have them do?

Treat them seriously as sexual assaults.

I think for the most part that men believe when their daughters acuse other men of sexual assault, however, it is a travesty that sexual assault cases on campus get treated more lightly then cheating on exams.

What is your goal here? Do you think that female victims of sexual assault are lying?

I will provide stats on this unless i get suspended

Why would you try to deflect accusations of sexual assault against students with this case? It doesn't reflect the real problem on campuses. Have you watched the documentary? This is another example of men trying to stifle the reporting of sexual assaults on women. Honestly, who cares whether it's American or Canadian. Get off your American high horse.

I would highly recommend anyone contributing to this thread to watch 'the hunting ground' on Netflix. It offers another view on sexual assaults on college and university campuses and it ain't pretty.

I got it.

Wtf is wrong with you people.

You are a bully.

He got banned because of long time members.

Heh. Ok. The difference between you and me is that I don't care if I get banned.

Yes I get that. I am challenging MLW to address that. Rules are meant to be challenged.And I would think that ogft is not a professional troll. Let's get real here. He is not a professional troll like you.

Good for you. I am too. He doesn't deserve to be banned.I don't agree with multiple IDs however I also don't agree with outright ban either. There needs to be some tolerance.

Do you really think those two members bring negativity to the forum? If the answer is yes, then I suppose so.

Fair enough. I'm just drawing attention to the gods.

A whiny member continuously complains and insinuates another member is breaking rules for no other reason then that member disagrees with his posts.At the very least, we need to be fair here. Regardless if rules are broken.

Yes I understand that. Heaven forbid we break rulesRules are typically made to be broken when they right a wrong.

Well there you go. Although I already knew that. My issue mostly is with a long term member who kept insinuating the issue because of his crybaby whining.

So did they ban him because he found a loophole and made a fool of them or because he was truly disrupting the forum without adding value or because he pissed off a long term member. That is the question in my mind.

True.

Many.