WestCoastRunner

No one is talking about taxing dual parents..

What does this have to do with single parents?

For gods sake. Tell dads to keep their prick in their pants and tell women to zip up their pants. And if a child is born, then they should both be responsible. It's a two way street.

What a messed up thought. Tax single parents. Come on Shady. Support your argument.

Don't you mean, should we tax others to help out children? Clearly,the parents have reneged on their duties. Does that mean we should be biased against single moms? and dads for that matter. This is about the children. Not the parents.

Honestly, I don't know why I'm starting this thread except to express my outrage that derogatory statements can be made against 'single mothers' without a means of women sticking up for themselves. I think that Shady and others should provide contributions to this thread to back the statements that we should tax single mothers because we don't want them. This is a horrific and sad statement that is allowed to be promoted on this forum.

Where did I suggest that?

Modern? I think not. Prostitution has been around forever.

I don't buy into throwing labels on people. He was exercising his rights in a democratic society as has been explained in this thread plenty of times. He's not a traitor.

I see this thread was successfully derailed to focus on cbc instead of the op. Good job BC!

What does this have to do with the govt's $1B shortfall in spending?

yea, you were.

But that's just wrong. You can't assume the majority of this forum is for anything. We are a multi-faceted group of folks. There is no majority.

Please provide a link. I have provided links when required. Please don't make me hunt.

Come on Bryan, back up your statements.

Wait, what? You are saying that the government is taking 1B from the FN's budget and giving it to cbc? The CBC has absolutely nothing to do with the FN's budget. Why on earth would you try and draw a connection to that?

right, so are you the 'others'?

I need a cite.

nasty! However, I'm not sure how cbc is related to this thread? Would you care to elaborate? "take that", sounds pretty immature to me.

Wow. Seriously? Well, at least you got a response! I am absorbing a tremendous amount of information from you. Please keep up the posts! I, for one, am reading them.

Honestly, can you draw a connection based on my OP?

I have yet to see any research and analysis by you.

If BC would contribute valuable content to this OP instead of his usual sarcastic trolling posts, then I would be more accepting of his posts. However, given his history of postings, and his current posts, I find absolutely nothing of value from his posts to my OP. Why is he allowed to contribute such Horsesh...t?

I just can't believe that BC can get away with these troll postings about cbc when the cbc has absolutely nothing to do with this PO and yet the moderators keep defining trolls as blah blah blah.