kimmy Posted April 5, 2012 Author Report Posted April 5, 2012 What I did was not in a sexual manner Santorum is a by-product of anal sex. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ)
stopstaaron Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Santorum is a by-product of anal sex. -k did not know that that is funny Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
jbg Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Now they can't even be bothered to utter a peep about Santorum's buddy Denny Terry. I wonder what changed? Maybe because Santorum is not a likely Presidential nominee. Also a Google search did not reveal anyone with that name that's particularly important. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Maybe because Santorum is not a likely Presidential nominee. Also a Google search did not reveal anyone with that name that's particularly important. Right...perhaps some people still think that Santorum, Gingrich, or Paul still have a shot at the nomination. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
jbg Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Santorum is a by-product of anal sex. did not know that that is funny I started a thread on that: Google the name Santorum. This is one of the results, in addition to Google's own first definition. (Result here). Obviously the former Senator is not happy (link, excerpts below): **************** Maybe you’ve noticed that when you search for Santorum’s name, this definition is the first result: “The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.” And that’s because Santorum, an outspoken opponent of gay rights, was Google bombed in 2003. Now that he’s running for president, he wants his problem to go away. Santorum recently told Politico.com that he approached Google about removing the definition, but they declined. ************ Now, I'd like some of you linguistic efforts to take a crack at this problem. Is that a legitimate definition, or not? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Guest American Woman Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Maybe because Santorum is not a likely Presidential nominee. Also a Google search did not reveal anyone with that name that's particularly important. I'm sure that would be why. Rev. Wright only became an issue when it became impossible to ignore the reality that Obama was taking McCain. Quote
jbg Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Right...perhaps some people still think that Santorum, Gingrich, or Paul still have a shot at the nomination. Some people think the earth is flat. Some people believe that dinosaurs and men walked the earth at the same time; including apparently Stockwell Day, at least of Warren Kinsella is to be believed. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
kimmy Posted April 5, 2012 Author Report Posted April 5, 2012 Right...perhaps some people still think that Santorum, Gingrich, or Paul still have a shot at the nomination. Indeed! People named Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul, respectively. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ)
kimmy Posted April 5, 2012 Author Report Posted April 5, 2012 Also a Google search did not reveal anyone with that name that's particularly important. I discussed the incident earlier in this thread. -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ)
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 (edited) Indeed! People named Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul, respectively. No...Gingrich and Paul know they will not be nominated. They are only issue candidates now for the party convention. Edited April 5, 2012 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Guest American Woman Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Indeed! People named Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul, respectively. They may be trying to hold on to the illusion, but I doubt if even they think they have a shot at it. Quote
kimmy Posted April 5, 2012 Author Report Posted April 5, 2012 No...Gingrich and Paul know they will not be nominated. They are only issue candidates now for the party convention. Paul, I get. But Newt? What "issue" is he representing? Moon colonies? -k Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ﾉ(° -°ﾉ)
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 Paul, I get. But Newt? What "issue" is he representing? Moon colonies? His own "12 Step" program....it's good for book sales. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Bonam Posted April 5, 2012 Report Posted April 5, 2012 If I really thought Newt would build a Moon colony, I'd be all for him being president. Quote
jbg Posted April 6, 2012 Report Posted April 6, 2012 Indeed! People named Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul, respectively. You're forgetting about Obama's waterboy, BC 2004. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.