Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I already posted here on the questionable (from the high morality perspective) attitude of US administrations to Cuba - without being a fan of regime in Havana myself. This CBC documentary may give some further insights into the issue: CBC documentary: 638 ways to kill Castro. Not to mention the general question as to what exactly constitutes terrorism. If Iranian guards are labelled terrorists for alledged involvement in Iraq, what about CIA paying hired guns to kill another country's elected leader?

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I already posted here on the questionable (from the high morality perspective) attitude of US administrations to Cuba - without being a fan of regime in Havana myself. This CBC documentary may give some further insights into the issue: CBC documentary: 638 ways to kill Castro. Not to mention the general question as to what exactly constitutes terrorism. If Iranian guards are labelled terrorists for alledged involvement in Iraq, what about CIA paying hired guns to kill another country's elected leader?

Exactly.

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted (edited)
If Iranian guards are labelled terrorists for alledged involvement in Iraq, what about CIA paying hired guns to kill another country's elected leader?

Silly really to pay them. Most would willing do it for free.

Give us the tools, was said, and we will finish the job.

Now ask your self a question, if terrorisms goal is to terrorize the public into submission, how is assassinating a dictator terrorism?

Edited by M.Dancer

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
In 2005, Posada was held by U.S. authorities in Texas on the charge of illegal presence on national territory before the charges were dismissed on May 8, 2007. His release on bail on April 19, 2007 had elicited angry reactions from the Cuban and Venezuelan governments.[11] The U.S. Justice Department had urged the court to keep him in jail because he was "an admitted mastermind of terrorist plots and attacks", a flight risk and a danger to the community.[6]

On September 28, 2005 a U.S. immigration judge ruled that Posada cannot be deported because he faced the threat of torture in Venezuela.[12]

Evil Yankees

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)
Evil Yankees

Evil indeed

On May 8, 2007 U.S. district judge Kathleen Cardone dismissed seven counts of immigration fraud and ordered Posada's electronic bracelet removed.[37]
The U.S. Justice Department had urged the court to keep him in jail because he was "an admitted mastermind of terrorist plots and attacks"

The US knows of his involvement in various illegal activities since since the early '60s (the US hired him themselves a few times). Yet he is still a free man more than 40 years later...

Edited by lost&outofcontrol
Posted
Now ask your self a question, if terrorisms goal is to terrorize the public into submission, how is assassinating a dictator terrorism?

Ok, bombing, assassinations, hiring thugs and so on are legitimate methods for the greater good? Just unfortunate smell (look and act) that has to be put up with. Hail, democracy!

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
Ok, bombing, assassinations, hiring thugs and so on are legitimate methods for the greater good? Just unfortunate smell (look and act) that has to be put up with. Hail, democracy!

Are all those events about killing castro?

I would say any designs on Castro's life are realpolitik,however distasteful and wrong. but not bonafida terrorism.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Evil indeed
On May 8, 2007 U.S. district judge Kathleen Cardone dismissed seven counts of immigration fraud and ordered Posada's electronic bracelet removed.[37]

So democracy and the criminal justice system. Are there any other western institutions you despise?

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Silly really to pay them. Most would willing do it for free.

Give us the tools, was said, and we will finish the job.

Now ask your self a question, if terrorisms goal is to terrorize the public into submission, how is assassinating a dictator terrorism?

Oh you mean like Blackwater?

As for your last line, M.Dancer, I doubt that even you is that obtuse.

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
Are all those events about killing castro?

I would say any designs on Castro's life are realpolitik,however distasteful and wrong. but not bonafida terrorism.

I guess you only read the parts of my link that you wanted.

Cubana Flight 455, 1976

All 48 passengers and 25 crew aboard the plane died: 57 Cubans, 11 Guyanese, and five North Koreans.

Tourist bombings of 1997

An Italian, Fabio di Celmo, was killed and 11 people wounded as a result.
Posted (edited)
I would say any designs on Castro's life are realpolitik,however distasteful and wrong. but not bonafida terrorism.

I wonder if Al Quaida uses these sorts of justifications? "Don't worry guys. It's not terrorism. It's realpolitik."

Edited by Higgly

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Posted
So convenient is it not M.Dancer?

Yes and accurate too. Surely you can differentiate a car bombed designed and deployed to kill hundreds of civilians and a cigar designed to kill a dictator?

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Yes I can and if you would of followed my links you would of seen that this man is guilty of both.

Absolutely. But he isn't part of the original post, so his inclusion is tangential and pretty much irrelevant given that he was arrested by the US.

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
Absolutely. But he isn't part of the original post, so his inclusion is tangential and pretty much irrelevant given that he was arrested by the US.

The original poster said:

[...]the general question as to what exactly constitutes terrorism. If Iranian guards are labelled terrorists for alledged involvement in Iraq, what about CIA paying hired guns to kill another country's elected leader?

Using the definition used by the United States of a terrorist, I think Luis Posada Carriles fits the bill. If the United States employs a know terrorist (they trained him to be one after all) for its own personal use while it runs wild in the middle east looking for another one then how can we trust their judgment. How can we posit any judgment for fact?

Posted

He is a terrorist, he was trained by the US but there is no evidence that he was used by the CIA for terrorist activities. His terrorism was his own inititive, in fact.....

Investigators from Cuba, Venezuela and the United States traced the planting of the bombs to two Venezuelan passengers, Freddy Lugo and Hernán Ricardo Lozano. Both men were employed by Posada at his private detective agency based in Venezuela, and they both subsequently admitted to the crime.

A week after the mens' confessions, Luis Posada and Orlando Bosch were arrested on charges of masterminding the attack, and were jailed in Venezuela.[22] Declassified FBI and CIA reports show that the agencies suspected his involvement in the airline bombing within days of its occurrence.[23][24]

The US worked against him.

Posada was paid $3000 per month plus expenses from U.S. Major General Richard Secord, who was directing operations for Oliver North
And here it shown that he is in the pocket of the reagan admin, directed by disgraced marine, North. and later.......]
Though recuperating in Honduras, the FBI believed that Posada was responsible for 41 bombings in the country, Posada himself admitted to planning numerous attacks against Cuba and seeking assistance from the Honduran military to aid his cause, which was not forthcoming

he is still being investigated by the FBI...

and at best....(or worst)

In 1998, The New York Times indicated that, even after the U.S. government no longer sponsored Posada's violent activities, Posada Carriles may have benefited from a tolerant attitude on the part of U.S. law enforceme

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
He is a terrorist, he was trained by the US but there is no evidence that he was used by the CIA for terrorist activities. His terrorism was his own inititive, in fact.....

You agree that he was in the US government's pocket for 30 or so years and that the US gov. stopped supporting him in 1998.

Why do you think he was hired during the contras period? What do you think the contras did in central America?

Posted
You agree that he was in the US government's pocket for 30 or so years and that the US gov. stopped supporting him in 1998.

Why do you think he was hired during the contras period? What do you think the contras did in central America?

I agree that the article in the NYT was in 1998. They stopped before that. And this is relavant again to what?

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
I agree that the article in the NYT was in 1998. They stopped before that.

The US supported him until at least 1990.

In February 1990 Posada was shot whilst sitting in his car in Guatemala city by unknown assailants that Posada believed were Cuban assassins. In his memoir, Posada said that his recovery and medical bills were paid by the Cuban American National Foundation, with additional payments from Richard Secord.

But the issue of when they stopped supporting him is moot. Why would they support him in the first place? Why would they train someone to be a terrorist. How can we rely on the judgment of such a .gov? If they grew a consciousness overnight and decided that they would not support him anymore why not just arrest him?

And this is relavant again to what?

Watch this:

I already posted here on the questionable (from the high morality perspective) attitude of US administrations to Cuba - [...] Not to mention the general question as to what exactly constitutes terrorism. If Iranian guards are labelled terrorists for alledged involvement in Iraq, what about CIA paying hired guns to kill another country's elected leader?
How can we posit any judgment for fact?
Posted

Which is why I'm asking what it has to do with the OP. Any actions by Posada were his own. Not by the US did he blow up planes........

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted (edited)
Which is why I'm asking what it has to do with the OP. Any actions by Posada were his own. Not by the US did he blow up planes........

The United states hired Posada not knowing what he would do during the contras period? The United States trained him to be a terrorist not knowing he would go around blowing things up?

Accessory to murder

Edited by lost&outofcontrol
Posted
The United states hired Posada not knowing what he would do during the contras period? The United States trained him to be a terrorist not knowing he would go around blowing things up?
In Central America, Posada was assigned as deputy to Félix Rodríguez, a CIA operative who had overseen the capture and execution of Ernesto "Che" Guevara in 1967. The pair were to coordinate drops of military supplies to the Contras, a paramilitary collective opposed to the leftist Sandanistas in Nicaragua. Posada was paid $3000 per month plus expenses from U.S. Major General Richard Secord, who was directing operations for Oliver North.[16] The subsequent Iran-Contra investigations cast light over U.S. operations in the region, and several of Posada's connections, including Félix Rodríguez were asked to testify.

Posada remained in El Salvador during the hearings before signing up as a security advisor to the Guatemalan government. He also remained in contact with Cuban exile groups during this period.[16] In February 1990 Posada was shot whilst sitting in his car in Guatemala city by unknown assailants that Posada believed were Cuban assassins. In his memoir, Posada said that his recovery and medical bills were paid by the Cuban American National Foundation, with additional payments from Richard Secord.[26] Though recuperating in Honduras, the FBI believed that Posada was responsible for 41 bombings in the country, Posada himself admitted to planning numerous attacks against Cuba and seeking assistance from the Honduran military to aid his cause, which was not forthcoming

If they knew what he was up to, do you think it would have been necessary for the FBI to investigate him?

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,927
    • Most Online
      1,878

    Newest Member
    BTDT
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...