Conservatives Cancel Discriminatory 10 year old Liberal Policy

[M.Dancer]

Because she is caucasian.

One of the finest looking caucasian women in the house.

[guyser]

Because she is caucasian.

One of the finest looking caucasian women in the house.

Caught her on TV last night, had a good look..... you are right. Reminds me of Aishwariya Rai , watched one of her quasi-bollywood movies last night....couldnt look away. Something in the water must produce such beauty.

[jdobbin]

That was just dobbin's attempt at finding somebody to fight with. Take him on if you want. Not very enjoyable really.

Actually, I was pointing out your specific sexism even after you took issue with it with Kinsella. Do you deny this?

Edited July 27, 2007 by jdobbin

[M.Dancer]

Because she is caucasian.

One of the finest looking caucasian women in the house.

Caught her on TV last night, had a good look..... you are right. Reminds me of Aishwariya Rai , watched one of her quasi-bollywood movies last night....couldnt look away. Something in the water must produce such beauty.

It's the caucasian genetic blueprint....My top beautiful celebrity caucasians are Catherine Zeta Jones, Sophia Loren, Nigella Lawson, Rachel Ray, Lisa Ray, everyone from Bride and Prejudice including Miss Rai and Rita Wolf whom played the daughter in My Beautiful Launderette.

[guyser]

It's the caucasian genetic blueprint....My top beautiful celebrity caucasians are Catherine Zeta Jones, Sophia Loren, Nigella Lawson, Rachel Ray, Lisa Ray, everyone from Bride and Prejudice including Miss Rai and Rita Wolf whom played the daughter in My Beautiful Launderette.

Damn fine genetics then. Got to say I would scratch Loren, and R Ray...but oh my to all of them on Bride and Prejudice....including the mother.

[M.Dancer]

It's the caucasian genetic blueprint....My top beautiful celebrity caucasians are Catherine Zeta Jones, Sophia Loren, Nigella Lawson, Rachel Ray, Lisa Ray, everyone from Bride and Prejudice including Miss Rai and Rita Wolf whom played the daughter in My Beautiful Launderette.

Damn fine genetics then. Got to say I would scratch Loren, and R Ray...but oh my to all of them on Bride and Prejudice....including the mother.

Rachel Ray knows how to cook.

[Charles Anthony]

This thread has degraded.

Each of you who have fueled this adolescent trash-talk should be ashamed.

[M.Dancer]

Thread is unlocked.......

I thought trash talk was saying unkind things......anyway, I also thought this thread was about why Ruby made the front page of the Star.....which is obvious.......she is Sikh, and so are the singhs......she is an MP, and she gets complaints. Considering that the star reaches to untennable heights to include a GTA connection to almost every story, having Ruby quoted is no surprise.

[Shakeyhands]

Thread drift? Why not?

Anybody who insists one being called "Dr." because they completed a chiropracter's course deserves scepticism.

Her photos suggest that she very much wants to be the centre of attention. I suspect that she is in politics for that reason alone.

Uh, for the same reason most magazines put beautiful young women with plunging necklines on their covers - people look and buy.

http://www.conservative.ca/?section_id=105...districtId=1567

Odd that.

[Michael Bluth]

http://www.conservative.ca/?section_id=105...districtId=1567

Odd that.

Does Carrie insist that he be called Doctor?

Edited August 15, 2007 by Michael Bluth

[jdobbin]

Does Carrie insist that he be called Doctor?

He has it on his website and in government websites.

http://www.ic.gc.ca/cmb/welcomeic.nsf/min/...ntary+Secretary

What exactly do you have against Ruby Dhalla? Her looks, her being a chiropractor?

This is what you said earlier in the thread.

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....=9542&st=04

Do you think this is appropriate? Do you think any MP should be addressed like this?

Edited August 15, 2007 by jdobbin

[Michael Bluth]

What exactly do you have against Ruby Dhalla? Her looks, her being a chiropractor?

Do you think this is appropriate? Do you think any MP should be addressed like this?

Her arrogance.

The moderator asked all involved in the thread earlier to abandon that line of discussion, so I did.

You haven't. Over and over you have brought the issue up. I guess only some of us respect the moderators around here.

Yet you accuse me of 'stalking' to the point the moderators had to step in and tell you to stop? Do explain how your actions aren't stalking...

Edited August 15, 2007 by Michael Bluth

[M.Dancer]

I don't find Bluth's comments sexist in the least. Just because she is a woman doesn't mean we should talk about her looks. Heck (wooaa! language!!), 'member when Stockboy Day rode out in his neoprene jumpsuit straddling his aqua croth rocket? Did anyone say watch how you describe him, avoid sexist language?

How about Harper in his ghey vest and cowboy hat last year at the Stampede....did anyone not comment on his looks....or when he was wearing his CBC correspondants vest with Bush and Fox.....should we not have pointed out he looked like a major nerd for fear of the sexist language police?

Treating women differently from the way we treat men is sexist. She's a politician, she has as much right to be either praised or ridiculed as any other clown.

Edited August 15, 2007 by M.Dancer

[jdobbin]

Her arrogance.

The moderator asked all involved in the thread earlier to abandon that line of discussion, so I did.

You haven't. Over and over you have brought the issue up. I guess only some of us respect the moderators around here.

Yet you accuse me of 'stalking' to the point the moderators had to step in and tell you to stop? Do explain how your actions aren't stalking...

I asked you about the comment long before any moderator commented on it within this thread and you brushed it off. And now you post in the same thread that was closed but your comment is left there for everyone to see. You said you would only address certain comments in certain threads. Is this not the appropriate thread?

[Michael Bluth]

I don't find Bluth's comments sexist in the least. Just because she is a woman doesn't mean we should talk about her looks. Heck (wooaa! language!!), 'member when Stockboy Day rode out in his neoprene jumpsuit straddling his aqua croth rocket? Did anyone say watch how you describe him, avoid sexist language?

Thanks Mo.

Yeah, it's typical of the double-standard of the left. Which is what I pointed out in commenting on Kinsella. Unfortunately, it got drowned out by the never-ending, never-thinking attacks on here. Quite interesting given that incessant behaviour is Kinsella's personal style.

[jdobbin]

I don't find Bluth's comments sexist in the least. Just because she is a woman doesn't mean we should talk about her looks. Heck (wooaa! language!!), 'member when Stockboy Day rode out in his neoprene jumpsuit straddling his aqua croth rocket? Did anyone say watch how you describe him, avoid sexist language?

How about Harper in his ghey vest and cowboy hat last year at the Stampede....did anyone not comment on his looks....or when he was wearing his CBC correspondants vest with Bush and Fox.....should we not have pointed out he looked like a major nerd for fear of the sexist language police?

Treating women differently from the way we treat men is sexist. She's a politician, she has as much right to be either praised or ridiculed as any other clown.

On the same day or so that this thread was introduced, a thread was introduced about Kinsella and Liberal sexism. I pointed out that hypocrisy on the part of the poster.

As for this thread, it quickly devolved into who you would do given the chance. You'll notice no women have posted here. I suppose they might have an issue with comment about a woman's body parts.

[jdobbin]

Yeah, it's typical of the double-standard of the left. Which is what I pointed out in commenting on Kinsella. Unfortunately, it got drowned out by the never-ending, never-thinking attacks on here. Quite interesting given that incessant behaviour is Kinsella's personal style.

You made the comment on Kinsella and then in the same day or so made a comment on Dhalla's body parts. Hypocrisy right there and yet you brushed it off.

[M.Dancer]

I suppose they might have an issue with comment about a woman's body parts.

Is this a Lever 2000 issue?

The topic was why Ruby made the front page of the Star. Her looks are germaine.

[jdobbin]

Is this a Lever 2000 issue?

The topic was why Ruby made the front page of the Star. Her looks are germaine.

But calling her back end a dump truck is germane to the discussion? I don't see how.

[M.Dancer]

But calling her back end a dump truck is germane to the discussion? I don't see how.

Because her front end made up for it.

Harper has a big ol' arse too.......

...and who really gives a flying flick? It ain't important.

[Michael Bluth]

Because her front end made up for it.

Harper has a big ol' arse too.......

...and who really gives a flying flick? It ain't important.

Exactly. And the comments on Harper's horrible vest and hat choice from a few Stampede's ago also focused on his gut.

Of course it ain't important. But hey, neither are the rules on this board.

Just make sure you don't offend certain posters here or they will ask you the same, unimportant, questions ad nauseum.

[jdobbin]

Exactly. And the comments on Harper's horrible vest and hat choice from a few Stampede's ago also focused on his gut.

Of course it ain't important. But hey, neither are the rules on this board.

Just make sure you don't offend certain posters here or they will ask you the same, unimportant, questions ad nauseum.

And have other posters avoid the question of whether they thought their own comment was sexist or inappropriate.

[Charles Anthony]

There has been baiting in this thread and elsewhere in the forum. The discussion in this thread degenerated into personal attacks against fellow members and third parties. All of this must stop.

I will be blunt: focus the discussion on politics and follow the forum rules. Otherwise, suspensions will be issued without warning.