Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just finished watching Olbermann's bit over on Crooks and Liars. It is quite disturbing that it is probably some of the executive orders that have gone through that makes themselves out of the loop and above the law and cannot be investigated. Does this smell like a democracy here at all??

Here Bush-Cheney, let ME get it in for you.

Unquote : Yeah, look at your own Prime Minister that has more power than that. yada yada yada.

The land of the free.

Posted

More on this from CNN. A report featuring Al Waxman.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/22/che...ents/index.html

In 2006, Leonard wrote to Cheney's chief of staff, David Addington, to contest the office's refusal to comply and was told that the vice president's office "does not believe it is included in the definition of 'agency' as set forth in the order," nor is it an "entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information," according to letters released Thursday by Waxman's committee.

In a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales requesting intervention on the matter, Leonard questioned the rationale presented by the vice president's office.

HAHAH, I am sure asking Alberto 'I don't recall/remember' Gonzales is not the answer or the person to answer those questions. He was a bad choice at the start, and has proven to be the bad choice.

This might give some insight to how things have been run for the last 7 years of this Administration's tennure. Cheney has a larger staff than Bush does, first time in US history that this has happened. It is like there are two Presidents in the White House and both are calling the shots. Actually it would seem that Cheney has been calling the shots all this time. Bush is just a spokesperson. Idiot, loudmouth up front, evil quite man in the back.

Posted

I like the one where Cheney sent Gonzalas over to Ashcroft's hospital room to attempt to get him to sign off on the White House's illegal domestic surveillance program. The man is pure evil.

Posted
I like the one where Cheney sent Gonzalas over to Ashcroft's hospital room to attempt to get him to sign off on the White House's illegal domestic surveillance program. The man is pure evil.

Vice President Cheney has bigger balls than "God"...scratch that...Dick Cheney IS GOD!

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Vice President Cheney has bigger balls than "God"...scratch that...Dick Cheney IS GOD!

I'm not crazy about having the image of Dick Cheney's enlarged scrotum in my head.

Posted

I like the one where Cheney sent Gonzalas over to Ashcroft's hospital room to attempt to get him to sign off on the White House's illegal domestic surveillance program. The man is pure evil.

Vice President Cheney has bigger balls than "God"...scratch that...Dick Cheney IS GOD!

no, big Dick cheney is DOG.

Posted

I like the one where Cheney sent Gonzalas over to Ashcroft's hospital room to attempt to get him to sign off on the White House's illegal domestic surveillance program. The man is pure evil.

Vice President Cheney has bigger balls than "God"...scratch that...Dick Cheney IS GOD!

now that is creepy.

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

Posted
I happened upon this article just now, while visiting another political site. It is entitled: Cheney Power Grab: Says White House Rules Don't Apply to Him

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/0...y-power-gr.html

Any thoughts on it?

democracy?

accountability to the people?

NOT!

dictatorship, authoritarianism

YUP!!!!

Insults are the ammunition of the unintelligent - do not use them. It is okay to criticize a policy, decision, action or comment. Such criticism is part of healthy debate. It is not okay to criticize a person's character or directly insult them, regardless of their position or actions. Derogatory terms such as "loser", "idiot", etc are not permitted unless the context clearly implies that it is not serious. Rule of thumb: Play the ball, not the person (i.e. tackle the argument, not the person making it).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,920
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Milla
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...