noahbody Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 [ 'Stevie' is far too familiar to be counted as truly respectful. But 'Steve' on the other hand is an admiring reference to the close relationship he has built with President George Wilkes Bush. Mr Dithers would then be acceptable too, since it was a name given to him by the Economist. Using either name just shows partisanship and the objective to attack or defend based on party loyalty. Likely not the best approach if you want someone else to consider your opinion. It is kind of expected on a forum. Would be nice if the media referred to the PM as PM Harper though. They did that with Martin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribblet Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 I wonder if the CPC booklet is as good or as bad as the opposition's too bad we can't read theirs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdobbin Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 I wonder if the CPC booklet is as good or as bad as the opposition's too bad we can't read theirs. Nice deflection. The only ones dumb enough to print a 200 page book on taxpayer money would appear to be the Tories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck E Stan Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 I wonder if the CPC booklet is as good or as bad as the opposition's too bad we can't read theirs. Nice deflection. The only ones dumb enough to print a 200 page book on taxpayer money would appear to be the Tories. Taxpayer money? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdobbin Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 Taxpayer money? That is why the NDP asked on Friday that the book be tabled in the House of Commons. If it was a party policy manual, they wouldn't be able to ask for it. We'll see what happens in a week. The Tories might be forced to table the book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck E Stan Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 That is why the NDP asked on Friday that the book be tabled in the House of Commons. If it was a party policy manual, they wouldn't be able to ask for it. We'll see what happens in a week. The Tories might be forced to table the book. That's not quite what you stated before. Sounds like you did some wishful thinking. Nice deflection. The only ones dumb enough to print a 200 page book on taxpayer money would appear to be the Tories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdobbin Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 That's not quite what you stated before.Sounds like you did some wishful thinking. Wishful thinking has little to do with it. The Conservatives use government coffers for everything including Harper's stylist. I fully expect this is taxpayer money as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Bluth Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 That's not quite what you stated before.Sounds like you did some wishful thinking. Flat out mischaracterizatoin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.