sharkman Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 So to get around the fact that China is almost the worst overall contributor, they per capita it and tah dah! With a population of 1.something billion, they come out smelling like a rose. Pure nonsense, but coming from the UN, I'm not surprised. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gc1765 Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 Per capita emissions really are a non sequitur, they simply don't make any difference. They might if all Americans consumed like Al Gore, but they don't. Joe Smith, the Canadian rides a bicycle, and re-cycles everything, and is a vegetarian, but not all Canadians are like him either. Per capita figures might be some sort of teaching device, but it is what is emitted, in total, that counts. The fact is that Canada emits more or less 2% of the world's greenhouse gases, and China, starting this year or next, will be the world's greatest emitter. Whatever Canada does, for good or evil, will make no significant difference as far as greenhouse gases are concerned. Using your logic, I could claim that Al Gore is a saint when it comes to the environment. Al Gore may have used 221,000 kWh per year, but America used about 1,000,000,000,000 kWh per year or about 5 million times what Al Gore used. The problem here, of course, is that Al Gore is one person and America is about 300 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rover1 Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 Per capita emissions really are a non sequitur, they simply don't make any difference. They might if all Americans consumed like Al Gore, but they don't. Joe Smith, the Canadian rides a bicycle, and re-cycles everything, and is a vegetarian, but not all Canadians are like him either. Per capita figures might be some sort of teaching device, but it is what is emitted, in total, that counts. The fact is that Canada emits more or less 2% of the world's greenhouse gases, and China, starting this year or next, will be the world's greatest emitter. Whatever Canada does, for good or evil, will make no significant difference as far as greenhouse gases are concerned. Using your logic, I could claim that Al Gore is a saint when it comes to the environment. Al Gore may have used 221,000 kWh per year, but America used about 1,000,000,000,000 kWh per year or about 5 million times what Al Gore used. The problem here, of course, is that Al Gore is one person and America is about 300 million. You might think that Al Gore is a saint, and I might think Al Gore is a sinner, but it doesn't really matter what we think of Al Gore, or Joe Smith. What is important, in my view, is the total amount of emissions, and what they are doing. In the end, it is the total ppm of atmospheric CO2 that is held to influence matters. In this regard, the doings of a country which has an insignificant amount of emissions, no matter what the per capita figures say, can never influence the outcome, so far as science is concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted April 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 You might think that Al Gore is a saint, and I might think Al Gore is a sinner, but it doesn't really matter what we think of Al Gore, or Joe Smith. What is important, in my view, is the total amount of emissions, and what they are doing. In the end, it is the total ppm of atmospheric CO2 that is held to influence matters. In this regard, the doings of a country which has an insignificant amount of emissions, no matter what the per capita figures say, can never influence the outcome, so far as science is concerned.Bullroar!!!CO2 is 3% of all GHG's. Let's say 2.8% of it was there before the industrial era. Even if we take all of the cars off the road in all countries of the world and revert to cave-man living, do you think it would change one temperature at one (non-urban) location on one day? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rover1 Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 You might think that Al Gore is a saint, and I might think Al Gore is a sinner, but it doesn't really matter what we think of Al Gore, or Joe Smith. What is important, in my view, is the total amount of emissions, and what they are doing. In the end, it is the total ppm of atmospheric CO2 that is held to influence matters. In this regard, the doings of a country which has an insignificant amount of emissions, no matter what the per capita figures say, can never influence the outcome, so far as science is concerned.Bullroar!!!CO2 is 3% of all GHG's. Let's say 2.8% of it was there before the industrial era. Even if we take all of the cars off the road in all countries of the world and revert to cave-man living, do you think it would change one temperature at one (non-urban) location on one day? Forgive me, I meant to say atmospheric GHG's. I think that the 3% CO2 number might be a bit low, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.