B. Max Posted April 15, 2007 Report Posted April 15, 2007 I think by the time 08 comes around Tom Tancredo is going to look like the Republicans best chance to hold onto the white house, and the best hope to fix the problems of the country. Grass roots support looks strong but will the party hierarchy stab him in the back. http://www.saveamericafund.com/tom-tancredo-pres.php Voting Record Scorecard American Conservative Union A+ National Right to Life Committee A National Rifle Association A Family Research Council A National Taxpayers Union A Americans for Better Immigration A+ National Federation of Independent Business A+ Quote
Guthrie Posted April 15, 2007 Report Posted April 15, 2007 I agree. Yeah, go with Tancredo. He'll do really good. Quote “Most middle-class whites have no idea what it feels like to be subjected to police who are routinely suspicious, rude, belligerent, and brutal” - Benjamin Spock MD
Canadian Blue Posted April 15, 2007 Report Posted April 15, 2007 Tom Tancredo, what is he at right now 1%... Why don't I just go out on a limb and say Kucinich is gonna win the White House. American Conservative Union A+ National Right to Life Committee A National Rifle Association A Family Research Council A National Taxpayers Union A Americans for Better Immigration A+ National Federation of Independent Business A+ So this just proves he's a right wing ideologue. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
B. Max Posted April 15, 2007 Author Report Posted April 15, 2007 name='Canadian Blue' date='Apr 15 2007, 03:48 PM' post='208124'] Tom Tancredo, what is he at right now 1%... I don't know what he's at right now. But I know the others don't have the base and what chunk of the base they do have is eroding as of late and they have been flip flopping around trying to get it back. So this just proves he's a right wing ideologue. It proves he is a traditionalist, and not a leftwing progressive / cultural Maxrist. Quote
Canadian Blue Posted April 15, 2007 Report Posted April 15, 2007 It proves he is a traditionalist, and not a leftwing progressive / cultural Maxrist. So he's just a little bit to the left of Franco then. For some reason I think 97% of America is probably considered a Marxist when compared to Tom Tancredo. I don't know what he's at right now. But I know the others don't have the base and what chunk of the base they do have is eroding as of late and they have been flip flopping around trying to get it back. Actually lets look at a recent poll and find out where Tancredo is at. http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/...em/itemID/15365 2% as compared to 38% for Giuliani, I highly doubt Tancredo has got a chance. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
B. Max Posted April 15, 2007 Author Report Posted April 15, 2007 2% as compared to 38% for Giuliani, I highly doubt Tancredo has got a chance. The election isn't tomorrow. The Republicans are still looking for Mr. right. Quote
Guthrie Posted April 15, 2007 Report Posted April 15, 2007 No, they aren't looking for, 'Mr Right.' The Republicans are still looking for, 'Mr Goodbar.' Quote “Most middle-class whites have no idea what it feels like to be subjected to police who are routinely suspicious, rude, belligerent, and brutal” - Benjamin Spock MD
Canadian Blue Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 The election isn't tomorrow. The Republicans are still looking for Mr. right. By alienating moderate voters, and probably carrying only a few redneck hick counties. Who in their right mind would actually vote for a guy that's so ideologically right wing. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
B. Max Posted April 21, 2007 Author Report Posted April 21, 2007 The election isn't tomorrow. The Republicans are still looking for Mr. right. By alienating moderate voters, and probably carrying only a few redneck hick counties. Who in their right mind would actually vote for a guy that's so ideologically right wing. Who did he alienate. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 By alienating moderate voters, and probably carrying only a few redneck hick counties. Who in their right mind would actually vote for a guy that's so ideologically right wing. Hmmmm.....the same few "redneck hick citizens" who voted amongst 62,040,610 for President George W. Bush in 2004. Humphrey ('68) and McGovern ('72) lost elections thinking the same thing. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
PolyNewbie Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 I don't see monetary reform on his platform or shutting down the federal reserve. If that isn't on his platform then he is the same as all the rest and the IMF will continue to own the USA and dictate its foreign policy. A flat consumption tax is a tax against the poor since they will pay it on almost 100 % of their income. Its the ellimination of tax for the rich because they will pay it on only a small percentage of their income. I smell GLOBALIST ELITIST country breaker and a man dedictaed to usher in the Technotronic era where everyone is chipped, enslaved, with cameras everywhere and no laws for the elite (multi- billionaire) classes. Vote Ron Paul or vote for enslavement. Quote Support the troops. Bring them home. Let the bankers fight their own wars. www.infowars.com Watch 911 Mysteries at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871 "By the time the people wake up to see the bars around them, the door will have already slammed shut." Texx Mars
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 Vote Ron Paul or vote for enslavement. But you can't vote for Ron Paul even if you wanted to. Accordingly, let Americans vote as they please, if you don't mind, even if it means more Saurian powers, FEMA detention camps, death by fluoridated water, and the New World Order (sorry if I missed anything). Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
B. Max Posted April 21, 2007 Author Report Posted April 21, 2007 Vote Ron Paul or vote for enslavement. But you can't vote for Ron Paul even if you wanted to. Accordingly, let Americans vote as they please, if you don't mind, even if it means more Saurian powers, FEMA detention camps, death by fluoridated water, and the New World Order (sorry if I missed anything). Yeah little green men. Quote
PolyNewbie Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 But you can't vote for Ron Paul even if you wanted to. Accordingly, let Americans vote as they please, if you don't mind, even if it means more Saurian powers, FEMA detention camps, death by fluoridated water, and the New World Order (sorry if I missed anything). This is a Canadian forum !!! Quote Support the troops. Bring them home. Let the bankers fight their own wars. www.infowars.com Watch 911 Mysteries at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871 "By the time the people wake up to see the bars around them, the door will have already slammed shut." Texx Mars
Canadian Blue Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 Who did he alienate. Lets see who he would alienate. Lets try all of the American voters who aren't afraid of minorities, who don't feel the need to have firearms to protect themselves, and people who are poor. Hmmmm.....the same few "redneck hick citizens" who voted amongst 62,040,610 for President George W. Bush in 2004. Humphrey ('68) and McGovern ('72) lost elections thinking the same thing. George W. Bush, considered one of the worst presidents in American history. In 1972 the Republican candidate Richard Nixon, what a great president, you know except for that Watergate scandal. If American's feel the need to elect Presidents who are completely in the fringe then they can go right ahead, all it will mean is people will have a worse opinion of them. Quote "Keep your government hands off my medicare!" - GOP activist
B. Max Posted April 21, 2007 Author Report Posted April 21, 2007 'Canadian Blue' date='Apr 21 2007, 06:38 PM' post='210733'] Who did he alienate Lets see who he would alienate. Lets try all of the American voters who aren't afraid of minorities, who don't feel the need to have firearms to protect themselves, and people who are poor. That would be the invasion of illegal aliens. George W. Bush, considered one of the worst presidents in American history. In 1972 the Republican candidate Richard Nixon, what a great president, you know except for that Watergate scandal. If American's feel the need to elect Presidents who are completely in the fringe then they can go right ahead, all it will mean is people will have a worse opinion of them. Other than allowing the illegal immigration to continue and the trade imbalance he's been one of the best. Quote
BubberMiley Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 ... he's been one of the best. And Paul Martin was a great campaigner. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
PolyNewbie Posted April 21, 2007 Report Posted April 21, 2007 They are all the same and just puppets for the international bankers. It makes absolutely no difference who is elected. "The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes."-- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court. "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991 Quote Support the troops. Bring them home. Let the bankers fight their own wars. www.infowars.com Watch 911 Mysteries at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871 "By the time the people wake up to see the bars around them, the door will have already slammed shut." Texx Mars
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 22, 2007 Report Posted April 22, 2007 This is a Canadian forum !!! Coulda fooled me....the only thing that interests you seems to happen in the US of A. Do you get Alex Jones local cable access in Canada, or just "Prison Planet"? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
bush_cheney2004 Posted April 22, 2007 Report Posted April 22, 2007 George W. Bush, considered one of the worst presidents in American history. In 1972 the Republican candidate Richard Nixon, what a great president, you know except for that Watergate scandal. If American's feel the need to elect Presidents who are completely in the fringe then they can go right ahead, all it will mean is people will have a worse opinion of them. Again with the Canadian value system projected to Americans. I'm sure that some Yanks feel as you do, but a larger number don't, and this Canuck neurosis about being loved on the international level is best left at home. Thank you for permission to elect any president we please, despite organizations like "Canadians for Kerry" in 2004. Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
ScottSA Posted April 22, 2007 Report Posted April 22, 2007 American's feel the need to elect Presidents who are completely in the fringe then they can go right ahead, all it will mean is people will have a worse opinion of them. Your idea of mainstream is Trotsky. I have a sneaking suspicion that Americans (note the lack of an apostrophe after "American") don't stay up at night worrying about electing the favored sons of leftwing ideologues in other countries. Just a suspicion I have... Quote
BubberMiley Posted April 22, 2007 Report Posted April 22, 2007 I do think they stay up at night with great remorse over who they elected in 2004. Quote "I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
ScottSA Posted April 22, 2007 Report Posted April 22, 2007 I do think they stay up at night with great remorse over who they elected in 2004. Well you do, but I doubt they do. Just because the noisiest and pinkest people in American think the war is a mistake doesn't mean everyone does. The left, apparently including you, have never understood the concept of the 'silent majority'. Quote
PolyNewbie Posted April 23, 2007 Report Posted April 23, 2007 BubberMiley:I do think they stay up at night with great remorse over who they elected in 2004. I think they are up at night wondering how they got aqway with stealing the election again. The electoral college is sold out to the globalist / neocons as well. Maybe its that anthrax - maybe they started getting military grade anthrax in the mail like just before the Patriot Act was signed. Quote Support the troops. Bring them home. Let the bankers fight their own wars. www.infowars.com Watch 911 Mysteries at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871 "By the time the people wake up to see the bars around them, the door will have already slammed shut." Texx Mars
B. Max Posted April 24, 2007 Author Report Posted April 24, 2007 BubberMiley:I do think they stay up at night with great remorse over who they elected in 2004. I think they are up at night wondering how they got aqway with stealing the election again. The electoral college is sold out to the globalist / neocons as well. Maybe its that anthrax - maybe they started getting military grade anthrax in the mail like just before the Patriot Act was signed. If you are going to run the world it would be a tough and busy job, one would likely have to stay up all night. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.