JerrySeinfeld Posted November 24, 2006 Report Posted November 24, 2006 Just curious about mainstream media... Why is it that the MSM report the word "Chechen Rebels" and avoid the term Islamic Militants when describing masscres in Beslan Schoolhouse or Moscow theatre? Why does the MSM report on the "tragedy in Darfur" but fail to report that it's part of a decades-long Islamic jihad in that country? And why are Paris rioters always referred to as "youths" when it's clearly MUSLIMS who are rioting? Why does the MSM report that Islamic Imams were kicked off a plane, but fail to mention that one of the men was connected to both Osama Bin Laden and a "charity", whose assets were frozen as part of the Terrorist-Funding legislation? There is a common thread to much of the world's violence, yet the MSM seems almost EAGER to ignore the obvious Islamic-Militant thread... WHY OH WHY IS THIS THE CASE??? Quote
jdobbin Posted November 24, 2006 Report Posted November 24, 2006 Just curious about mainstream media...Why is it that the MSM report the word "Chechen Rebels" and avoid the term Islamic Militants when describing masscres in Beslan Schoolhouse or Moscow theatre? Why does the MSM report on the "tragedy in Darfur" but fail to report that it's part of a decades-long Islamic jihad in that country? And why are Paris rioters always referred to as "youths" when it's clearly MUSLIMS who are rioting? Why does the MSM report that Islamic Imams were kicked off a plane, but fail to mention that one of the men was connected to both Osama Bin Laden and a "charity", whose assets were frozen as part of the Terrorist-Funding legislation? There is a common thread to much of the world's violence, yet the MSM seems almost EAGER to ignore the obvious Islamic-Militant thread... WHY OH WHY IS THIS THE CASE??? You could always watch the FOX network. Why worry about the mainstream media when FOX will set you straight. Quote
Higgly Posted November 24, 2006 Report Posted November 24, 2006 There's always the National Enquirer for the sexiness report. Or you could just give Eva Longhoria a call! Quote "We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).
scribblet Posted November 25, 2006 Report Posted November 25, 2006 Just curious about mainstream media...Why is it that the MSM report the word "Chechen Rebels" and avoid the term Islamic Militants when describing masscres in Beslan Schoolhouse or Moscow theatre? Why does the MSM report on the "tragedy in Darfur" but fail to report that it's part of a decades-long Islamic jihad in that country? And why are Paris rioters always referred to as "youths" when it's clearly MUSLIMS who are rioting? Why does the MSM report that Islamic Imams were kicked off a plane, but fail to mention that one of the men was connected to both Osama Bin Laden and a "charity", whose assets were frozen as part of the Terrorist-Funding legislation? There is a common thread to much of the world's violence, yet the MSM seems almost EAGER to ignore the obvious Islamic-Militant thread... WHY OH WHY IS THIS THE CASE??? Your right on that, CBC et al don't like to use 'Islamikc Militants' too politcally incorrect, besides don't you know its those 'right wing evangelical fundies' that are the problem . Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
betsy Posted November 25, 2006 Report Posted November 25, 2006 I guess, Islamic Militants are protected species. Quote
Black Dog Posted November 26, 2006 Report Posted November 26, 2006 Why are some people so stupid as to be unable to distinguish between violence by followers of Islam and violence because of Islam? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.