Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

shwa has the better?...shwa claimed small pox can not be spread by clothing/blankets...incorrect, the entire argument ends on that point...medical knowledge of of smallpox was sufficient enough that people were routinely infected in order to prevent epidemics, that same knowledge was used to begin epidemics as well...

small pox less of a factor than desotos pigs, incorrect...

historical records indicate a mortality of between 65-85% among native americans from small pox...the effect of having such large numbers of people die in any society will severely hamper that society to function normally...

Hey, I have no argument. I was being sarcastic. <_<

  • Replies 530
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Hey, I have no argument. I was being sarcastic. <_<

too subtle....I'll need to turn up my sarcasm detector to high....

“Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives.”- John Stuart Mill

Posted

too subtle....I'll need to turn up my sarcasm detector to high....

It was absurd as I could make it without seeming desperate. :D

Posted

It was absurd as I could make it without seeming desperate. :D

It just goes to show that people are desperate enough to find support for their position from any where. That is why Wikipedia was created. Anyone can create information to support something that has no support anywhere else on the internet.

“Safeguarding the rights of others is the most noble and beautiful end of a human being.” Kahlil Gibran

“Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.” Albert Einstein

Posted

It just goes to show that people are desperate enough to find support for their position from any where. That is why Wikipedia was created. Anyone can create information to support something that has no support anywhere else on the internet.

And here I thought Wikipedia was a crowdsourcing project meant to assemble knowledge on a scale never before realized...

Posted

And here I thought Wikipedia was a crowdsourcing project meant to assemble knowledge on a scale never before realized...

Agreed. I think if the sources are sound, it has it's utility no less than any other encyclopedia.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,887
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    cummingsfrank
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...