Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I know someone *ahem* will call that AI or FOS lies or claim Twitter had something nefarious to do with it. So, here is a Media Matters link to prove that this guy was consistent: https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-business/foxs-charles-payne-obama-administration-forgiving-student-loans-bald-faced-attempt-buy

See how Republicans are the threat to democracy. They don't allow Democrats to create targeted cash programs that would influence key demographics to vote for them. Those evil Republicans. /Sarcasm

 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

  • gatomontes99 changed the title to Obama Student Loans Was a Scheme To Buy Votes
Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

@gatomontes99 Tweets are NOT EVIDENCE. Anyone can post a FAKE Tweet.

Open eyesey and looky at the linky. There will you find the evidency.

 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Legato said:

Open eyesey and looky at the linky. There will you find the evidency.

 

Naked links are NOT EVIDENCE. Quote it here from a reputable source, or it didn't happen.

Edited by robosmith
Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Naked links are NOT EVIDENCE. Quote it here from a reputable source, or it didn't happen.

Of course it happened, denial is still denial.

Media Matters a registered, legitimate 501(c)(3) nonprofit and media watchdog. However, its legitimacy as an objective news source is debated; it is an explicitly progressive/liberal organization that exists to monitor and correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Naked links are NOT EVIDENCE. Quote it here from a reputable source, or it didn't happen.

Media Matters is not reputable to you? I thought all you lefties loved it?  There are multiple vids of the guy saying the same thing. You guys are not unpredictable, you are the opposite. I even called you out and disproved your post before you even posted it. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Legato said:

Of course it happened, denial is still denial.

Media Matters a registered, legitimate 501(c)(3) nonprofit and media watchdog. However, its legitimacy as an objective news source is debated; it is an explicitly progressive/liberal organization that exists to monitor and correct conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. 

Charles Payne FOS LIES OPINION that it was a "bald faced attempt to buy votes" means NOTHING.

There was NO REQUIREMENT for a vote to get the loans forgiven. Duh

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Charles Payne FOS LIES OPINION that it was a "bald faced attempt to buy votes" means NOTHING.

There was NO REQUIREMENT for a vote to get the loans forgiven. Duh

 

What about the fact...and it is a fact...that they did exactly what he said they would do? 

It was not a lie, it was a prediction. A prediction that was so accurate in its timing and scope that it made me find a second source to verify that it was not AI. It was not AI. His prediction was published by an extreme leftist media site. 

You are desperately clinging to your fantasy world. I have to wonder what the fall out will be if you ever do acknowledge reality. I imagine it will be simultaneously the worst and best day of your life. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

What about the fact...and it is a fact...that they did exactly what he said they would do? 

It was not a lie, it was a prediction. A prediction that was so accurate in its timing and scope that it made me find a second source to verify that it was not AI. It was not AI. His prediction was published by an extreme leftist media site. 

You are desperately clinging to your fantasy world. I have to wonder what the fall out will be if you ever do acknowledge reality. I imagine it will be simultaneously the worst and best day of your life. 

Nope, that's you:

There was NO REQUIREMENT for a vote to get the loans forgiven. AKA NOT buying votes. Duh

Do you even know what "buying" means? LMAO

Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Nope, that's you:

There was NO REQUIREMENT for a vote to get the loans forgiven. AKA NOT buying votes. Duh

Do you even know what "buying" means? LMAO

Your definition of buying votes is not applicable as it is just your opinion. MSNOWjob LIES!

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,022
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...