John Johnston Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 1 minute ago, John Johnston said: Hmm. Is it Dinguses or is it Dingii? 😄 The correct plural form of "dingus" is "dinguses". The term "dingii" is not recognized as a valid plural form of "dingus". Huh. So guess that settles that. 😁 Quote
CdnFox Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 4 hours ago, Barquentine said: Except he didn't, Except he did as I've already demonstrated. But maybe if you keep repeating the LIE often enough it'll somehow magically start to be true 53 minutes ago, John Johnston said: The correct plural form of "dingus" is "dinguses". The term "dingii" is not recognized as a valid plural form of "dingus". Huh. So guess that settles that. 😁 It is beyond weird that you quote yourself all the time. It's like you know nobody's going to talk with you and it upsets you so you talk to yourself or something. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
John Johnston Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 (edited) 16 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Except he did as I've already demonstrated. But maybe if you keep repeating the LIE often enough it'll somehow magically start to be true It is beyond weird that you quote yourself all the time. It's like you know nobody's going to talk with you and it upsets you so you talk to yourself or something. Huh? Lol. Not In the habit of worrying about anonymous bits and bytes. Do you? Edited May 26 by John Johnston Quote
Moonbox Posted June 4 Report Posted June 4 On 5/13/2026 at 11:08 PM, Goober National said: He was already dead. No one was calling for him to be killed, right? Of course not. That is only done by tyrannical maniacs like the Ayatollahs, and apparently you guys. What about all of the folks diaper Don doesn't like that he's said should be executed? 🫠 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted June 4 Report Posted June 4 1 hour ago, Moonbox said: What about all of the folks diaper Don doesn't like that he's said should be executed? 🫠 Like who? Who are all these people that trump says should be executed exactly? Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Moonbox Posted June 4 Report Posted June 4 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Like who? Who are all these people that trump says should be executed exactly? Like General Mark Milley, Liz Cheney, Democratic Congress members Elissa Slotkin, Mark Kelly, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan and Maggie Goodlander are good starts. 🙃 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted June 4 Report Posted June 4 2 minutes ago, Moonbox said: Like General Mark Milley, Liz Cheney, Democratic Congress members Elissa Slotkin, Mark Kelly, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan and Maggie Goodlander are good starts. 🙃 That doesn't seem to be true as far as i can see. He said she should be tried for sedition and noted that sedition is punishable by death. But he did not call for her execution. he called for their arrest and trial. If a person committed a crime punishable by death and someone said they should be arrested and tried that is not the same as calling for someone's death. That's calling for someone to be held accountable under the law for a crime. As usual you twist the truth to try to defend your own 'side's bad actions. Nice attempt at whataboutism tho. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Goober National Posted June 5 Author Report Posted June 5 11 hours ago, Moonbox said: What about all of the folks diaper Don doesn't like that he's said should be executed? 🫠 Been drinkin that leftist kookaid rather deeply, haven't you. Quote
Barquentine Posted June 5 Report Posted June 5 (edited) 18 hours ago, CdnFox said: He said she should be tried for sedition and noted that sedition is punishable by death. But he did not call for her execution. Oh, but Kimmel did? You PHUCKING HYPOCRITE! (And Trump ass-kisser!) Edited June 5 by Barquentine Quote
Moonbox Posted June 5 Report Posted June 5 20 hours ago, CdnFox said: That doesn't seem to be true as far as i can see. He said she should be tried for sedition and noted that sedition is punishable by death. But he did not call for her execution. he called for their arrest and trial. It's entertaining that you draw this as a meaningful distinction. 🤣 Quote "A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous
CdnFox Posted June 5 Report Posted June 5 3 hours ago, Barquentine said: Oh, but Kimmel did? You PHUCKING HYPOCRITE! (And Trump ass-kisser!) ROFLMAO!!!!!! HOLY TRIGGERED LEFTIES BATMAN!!! Yeah, Kimmel did. And we've been over that, You're a complete and utter liar, But i love that you think that if you lie in a bigger font it'll make it true somehow DERP! YOU CAN TELL I'M REEAAAALLY TELLING THE TRUTH NOW BECAUSE OF MY FONT SIZE!! DERP!! Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
John Stone Posted June 6 Report Posted June 6 On 6/4/2026 at 3:23 PM, CdnFox said: That doesn't seem to be true as far as i can see. He said she should be tried for sedition and noted that sedition is punishable by death. But he did not call for her execution. he called for their arrest and trial. If a person committed a crime punishable by death and someone said they should be arrested and tried that is not the same as calling for someone's death. That's calling for someone to be held accountable under the law for a crime. As usual you twist the truth to try to defend your own 'side's bad actions. Nice attempt at whataboutism tho. Nov 20, 2025 Trump posted on Truth Social saying the Dem lawmakers video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders was, 'seditious behaviour, punishable by death" and then reposting material that included calls to, 'HANG THEM'?😧 Quote
CdnFox Posted June 6 Report Posted June 6 2 hours ago, John Stone said: Nov 20, 2025 Trump posted on Truth Social saying the Dem lawmakers video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders was, 'seditious behaviour, punishable by death" and then reposting material that included calls to, 'HANG THEM'?😧 Yes, already discussed. He said they broke the law, should be arrested tried convinced and receive the death penalty. That's a legal process. If you say a person guilty of a crime punishable by death should be tried and punished by death, that is not the same as suggesting a police officer and his family should be illegally murdered. It's just a little sad you needed to have that difference explained to you. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Barquentine Posted June 6 Report Posted June 6 21 hours ago, CdnFox said: ROFLMAO!!!!!! HOLY TRIGGERED LEFTIES BATMAN!!! Yeah, Kimmel did. And we've been over that, You're a complete and utter liar, But i love that you think that if you lie in a bigger font it'll make it true somehow DERP! YOU CAN TELL I'M REEAAAALLY TELLING THE TRUTH NOW BECAUSE OF MY FONT SIZE!! DERP!! You're the saddest troll on the internet, Kiddo.😁😑🙃😙!!! Quote
CdnFox Posted June 6 Report Posted June 6 2 hours ago, Barquentine said: You're the saddest troll on the internet, Kiddo.😁😑🙃😙!!! IT MUST BE TRUE BECAUSE YOU SAID IT IN BOLD!! ROFLMAO! You're such a child! Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
John Johnston Posted June 7 Report Posted June 7 On 6/4/2026 at 12:02 PM, CdnFox said: Like who? Who are all these people that trump says should be executed exactly? Are you really that F@cking stupid? Quote
CdnFox Posted June 7 Report Posted June 7 2 hours ago, John Johnston said: Are you really that F@cking stupid? Haven't found any so far and neither could those who tried. As i've already pointed out But your childish outburst suggests you already realized that and are just angry about it. Sorry. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CrakHoBarbie Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 On 5/26/2026 at 9:03 AM, John Johnston said: Hmm. Is it Dinguses or is it Dingii? 😄 I used the plural to indicate multiples in a single unit. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 On 5/26/2026 at 9:03 AM, John Johnston said: Hmm. Is it Dinguses or is it Dingii? 😄 I used the plural to indicate multiples in a single unit. On 5/25/2026 at 1:17 PM, CdnFox said: Well no it isn't. Donald hasn't passed any new laws to restrict Kimmel. He hasn't even suggested that he should be prosecuted under existing laws. And I certainly haven't and I'm the one you were replying to So what's happened yet again is that you've realized you said something stupid, I have rubbed your nose in that and you feel completely stupid and angry and you're desperately trying to rewrite your argument so that it doesn't sound as amazingly stupid as it did. You cannot. This has absolutely nothing to do with first amendment rights. It says everything to do with a comedic person going too far and suggesting that the president should be killed or dead. But I really do honestly appreciate you stopping by and making you laugh Quite the imagination on this one... Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 On 5/25/2026 at 1:14 PM, CdnFox said: Let me know when you get there and we'll find out And yet I'm right and you're wrong. So what does that say about you? Also, 'stupid' isn't a restricted word here. They wanted you to feel included. Projection Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 On 5/25/2026 at 1:08 PM, CdnFox said: LOL you're too stupid to be able to actually explain your point because even YOU don't understand it and somehow it's my fault 😂😂😂😂😂 the problem here seems to be that even you don't understand it. And it's hilarious that you would try and pass off the idea that you don't think it's worth posting because I wouldn't understand it yet you actually did make two posts where you couldn't explain it which presumably you did because you thought I would understand it Utterly irrelevant. It is long been established that this in no way shape or form gives people the right to call for the violation of the rights of others. You cannot stand up and say we should kill the blacks and the jews. That would be advocating violence and a crime. However, you've managed to be double irrelevant. Nobody here has actually said that a law should be changed or that congress should take any action. I haven't seen anybody propose a 'kimmel' law or the like. So not only were you wrong to begin with, but you managed to be double wrong because you're talking about something nobody has even suggested You have somehow managed to condense stupidity into a more pure form Well done You still crossed the line and you're still defending it Goodness. As usual, you have enough information to believe you're right, but not enough info to know your wrong. Its adorable. Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 On 5/22/2026 at 7:46 PM, CdnFox said: I read it. It says you're a dumbass Now did you have a point or are you just desperate to look stupid again? A person who cannot articulate his point is literally someone too dumb to know what they're talking about. Hummm. Please point out the word "dumbass". https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ Quote
John Johnston Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Goodness. As usual, you have enough information to believe you're right, but not enough info to know your wrong. Its adorable. Lol. :) 1 Quote
John Johnston Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 13 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: I used the plural to indicate multiples in a single unit. Quite the imagination on this one... 😄😄 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted June 12 Report Posted June 12 15 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Projection No projection is something else. This is just observation. If I were wrong you would be in a position to refute that observation by providing evidence and facts to the contrary. But I appreciate you taking the time to demonstrate that you're stupid by misusing the word projection you had ONE WORD in that reply and you STILL got it wrong 13 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Goodness. As usual, you have enough information to believe you're right, but not enough info to know your wrong. Its adorable. And as usual you can't actually refute what was said and so revert to ad hominems in a desperate attempt to cover up your own lack of intellect I don't know if I'd call it adorable but it certainly entertaining Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.