The Definition Of Hatred In C-9 Is Rubbish Senators And Here Is Why

[herbie]

3 hours ago, Political Smash said:

Bill C-9 clearly states: Hatred means

Yes it does that, so what? You're supposed to know what hate means by time you're six. 

[Political Smash]

7 hours ago, Queenmandy85 said:

You are forgetting people who are born with the physical attributes of one gender and the mental attributes of the opposite gender. This can be treated with SRS. 

Fact: Homosexuals have sex with those born with the same genitalia. However, it is not clear cut. Many people have had sexual relations in both genders. Love is love. Just look ate the famous people who were gay. Julius Caesar, King Richard the Lion Heart, President Abraham Lincoln, and Queen Anne to name a few.

 

No matter how you try and spin it, the only thing that determines one’s sex / gender is binary XY or XX chromosomes for life. I do not forget that you spew lgbt rubbish to support liars and deceivers pretending to be what they are not and never will be.

 

fact it is clear cut because of the fact that those who knowingly have sex with both genders are bi sexual.

 

 Love is love but has absolutely no relevance when it comes to the foundation of the issue.

 

 People you mention that are gay has no relevance to do with the foundation of this issue.

 

 Same thing for decades, evade the foundation of the issue while trying to make anything irrelevant the issue from these lgbt types.

[Political Smash]

5 hours ago, herbie said:

Yes it does that, so what? You're supposed to know what hate means by time you're six. 

Oh so you cut out most of the quote to try and make it look the opposite of what it is. 
 

since you left the rest out here it is once again you intellectual coward.

It’s not a mere opinion because once again “The proposed Bill C-9 clearly states: Hatred means an emotion of intense and extreme nature that is clearly associated with vilification and detestation; (haine)”

Which describes being disgusted and being infuriated which is obviously not hatred yet you cower from addressing this simple fact which proves that the liberal attempt at defining hate is pure rubbish.

 

so you’re admitting to having the mentality of a five year old?!!

Edited May 1 by Political Smash

[herbie]

No, you're the one trying to imply that that meaning of hate has something to do with the intent of the proposed law and there's some nefarious reason behind the law.

[Queenmandy85]

17 hours ago, Political Smash said:

No matter how you try and spin it, the only thing that determines one’s sex / gender is binary XY or XX chromosomes for life. I do not forget that you spew lgbt rubbish to support liars and deceivers pretending to be what they are not and never will be.

If a person wishes to undergo gender reassignment surgery and are approved as candidates, why should they not do that?  

If two people of the same gender wish to have an intimate relationship, that is their choice. Why are you opposed to that?

Edited May 2 by Queenmandy85

[herbie]

1 hour ago, Queenmandy85 said:

If a person wishes to undergo gender reassignment

Do you also wonder what's behind the so-called-conservative fascination with genitalia? On the fatalistic outlook insists that one's personality and thought process are predetermined by genetics?

What if you were born with both gemitals? What bathroom would they insist you use? Do thay make wives and daughters use the upstairs bathroom and confine sons and male visitors to the downstairs one?

[Queenmandy85]

21 hours ago, herbie said:

Do you also wonder what's behind the so-called-conservative fascination with genitalia?

I am glad you used the qualifier "so-called." There is nothing "conservative" about it. 

[herbie]

True nuff.

I listened to Ben Mulroney's talk show on the radio the other day and I swear his own father would recognize him as a Conservative.
Callers unfounded accusations were met with "Good question, caller", outright lies, made up numbers and financial figures not contested.
The hostility of callers blaming Carney for "letting" gays exist, Judges make their own decisions, refugees and immigrants arrive etc, Along with the delusion that he determines gas and grocery prices.

 

[Political Smash]

On 5/1/2026 at 10:50 PM, herbie said:

No, you're the one trying to imply that that meaning of hate has something to do with the intent of the proposed law and there's some nefarious reason behind the law.

 What I am stating was a the the liberals pathetic attempt to define hate describes when someone justly becomes infuriated with someone’s ignorance or disgusted with their actions which proves that their definition of hate it rubbish.

On 5/2/2026 at 12:33 PM, Queenmandy85 said:

If a person wishes to undergo gender reassignment surgery and are approved as candidates, why should they not do that?  

If two people of the same gender wish to have an intimate relationship, that is their choice. Why are you opposed to that?

Genital mutilation doesn’t determine one’s gender, xy and xy chromosomes are the only thing that does. And such a so called surgery should never be done because it facilitates lies and deceptions which lead to eat and divide. I couldn’t give a rat’s behind if two homosexuals or lesbians want to be together, that is not the issue.

On 5/2/2026 at 2:04 PM, herbie said:

Do you also wonder what's behind the so-called-conservative fascination with genitalia? On the fatalistic outlook insists that one's personality and thought process are predetermined by genetics?

What if you were born with both gemitals? What bathroom would they insist you use? Do thay make wives and daughters use the upstairs bathroom and confine sons and male visitors to the downstairs one?

Hermaphrodite is irrelevant as a physical defect, not sexually retarded.

On 5/3/2026 at 11:16 AM, Queenmandy85 said:

I am glad you used the qualifier "so-called." There is nothing "conservative" about it. 

Being against lies and deceptions means you get labelled by some flake as having  a so called fascination with genitalia as such pathetic tactics are always use to try and deflect that the flake has no relevance upon the foundation of the issue.

On 5/3/2026 at 2:38 PM, herbie said:

True nuff.

I listened to Ben Mulroney's talk show on the radio the other day and I swear his own father would recognize him as a Conservative.
Callers unfounded accusations were met with "Good question, caller", outright lies, made up numbers and financial figures not contested.
The hostility of callers blaming Carney for "letting" gays exist, Judges make their own decisions, refugees and immigrants arrive etc, Along with the delusion that he determines gas and grocery prices.

 

[Political Smash]

Somehow it wouldn’t give me the space to respond to that last one but I would have to listen to that podcast to give a proper response.

[Goober National]

On 4/22/2026 at 6:18 PM, Political Smash said:

 

 

The proposed Bill C-9 clearly states: Hatred means an emotion of intense and extreme nature that is clearly associated with vilification and detestation; (haine)

 

 Being disgusted with someone's actions and being infuriated with someone's ignorance is not hatred so this definition is clearly rubbish.

Right. it needs to be more specific, with wording such as "vilification and detestation"... of a person. Maybe it should also add "of a person or group", but I'm not sure.

[Political Smash]

On 6/9/2026 at 12:37 PM, Goober National said:

Right. it needs to be more specific, with wording such as "vilification and detestation"... of a person. Maybe it should also add "of a person or group", but I'm not sure.

If a person robs people they deserve to be vilified by those robbed and those robbed naturally feel detestation as a result but is not hatred.

[Goober National]

On 6/10/2026 at 10:39 PM, Political Smash said:

If a person robs people they deserve to be vilified by those robbed and those robbed naturally feel detestation as a result but is not hatred.

I'm not sure detestation of a person or group is not hatred. But I know one thing, hatred is increasing and becoming a serious problem. People get addicted to hate, they want something to hate. Also I believe foreign influence is causing division among us, making us argue over something where there is no need for argument. To the point, it is dividing our society. Canada was once a bastion of tolerance and acceptance. But you can't just let things go on the way they are now. We've brought in hundreds of thousands of people from nations that do not cherish tolerance. So what we already believed in, not to hate shit, needs to be made a law for these people. That is, specifically and primarily, the islamic Jew-haters.