Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Many know that another expensive social program would just push Canada deeper into debt.  We are already quite far in debt and Canadians must pay the interest through their taxes.  That means less government revenue available for the various other social programs we already have.  Strange that the NDP lefties can't understand this.  Social programs don't just pay for themselves out of thin air.

Many Canadians already have pharmacare coverage through the companies they work for.  A new government program would throw all that into question and would mean people who can afford to pay for their existing employment based programs would be paying for something everyone else is receiving from government mandate.  How would that be fair or equitable?  It wouldn't.

There is already a government-funded pharmacare program in B.C. that pays for medications when a person reaches a certain cost in a given year.  After that the pharmacare pays the rest.  These days, governments need to show some restraint because big pharma companies are already raking in a fortune for certain medications and there has to some kind of restraint on it. 

Drugstores also get a good cut.  Doctors renew prescriptions every three months and really how much of that is necessary every three months.  There are doctor's fees, drugstore dispensing fees and time and trouble getting prescriptions renewed and filled.  I think some of it is just a ripoff because many drugs are taken for many years so why do they require a renewal every 90 days?  It's a scam.   Governments should really take a close look at that and see if there is some way they can change the system to stop all the unnecessary renewals every 90 days and perhaps put them on an annual renewal system for some drugs.

Edited by blackbird
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, blackbird said:

Many know that another expensive social program would just push Canada deeper into debt.  We are already quite far in debt and Canadians must pay the interest through their taxes.  That means less government revenue available for the various other social programs we already have.  Strange that the NDP lefties can't understand this.  Social programs don't just pay for themselves out of thin air.

Many Canadians already have pharmacare coverage through the companies they work for.  A new government program would throw all that into question and would mean people who can afford to pay for their existing employment based programs would be paying for something everyone else is receiving from government mandate.  How would that be fair or equitable?  It wouldn't.

There is already a government-funded pharmacare program in B.C. that pays for medications when a person reaches a certain cost in a given year.  After that the pharmacare pays the rest.  These days, governments need to show some restraint because big pharma companies are already raking in a fortune for certain medications and there has to some kind of restraint on it. 

Drugstores also get a good cut.  Doctors renew prescriptions every three months and really how much of that is necessary every three months.  There are doctor's fees, drugstore dispensing fees and time and trouble getting prescriptions renewed and filled.  I think some of it is just a ripoff because many drugs are taken for many years so why do they require a renewal every 90 days?  It's a scam.   Governments should really take a close look at that and see if there is some way they can change the system to stop all the unnecessary renewals every 90 days and perhaps put them on an annual renewal system for some drugs.

It's true the provinces already covered many of these things in many cases.

For example as you note in British Columbia birth control was already free and diabetic medicine is covered under pharmacare in British Columbia. Lower income people already get their treatments for free. Even if your work doesn't offer medical a person making $75,000 a year in British Columbia still gets most of their medications not just diabetes free of charge after the first $2,000. And people making less haven't even smaller deductible

So the government program really wasn't actually providing anything new for these people.

The whole thing was just a big smoke show to try and look like they were doing the right thing but it was complete bull crap and expensive bull crap at that. So it's no shock that Carney's not excited about continuing to put the bill when he's got a hundred billion dollar deficit to deal with

Edited by CdnFox

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,023
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Fred Kurtz
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...