August1991 Posted Sunday at 06:41 AM Report Posted Sunday at 06:41 AM (edited) In Fall 2026, the CAQ will not win re-election. I suspect that it will be a PQ majority. (The Liberals have no chance... ) Alberta? If anything, some people now prefer a referendum. And we have a federal government with a very, very ambitious clueless PM - but a bare minority. Hmmm. Edited Sunday at 07:00 AM by August1991 Quote
CdnFox Posted Sunday at 04:08 PM Report Posted Sunday at 04:08 PM 9 hours ago, August1991 said: In Fall 2026, the CAQ will not win re-election. I suspect that it will be a PQ majority. (The Liberals have no chance... ) Alberta? If anything, some people now prefer a referendum. And we have a federal government with a very, very ambitious clueless PM - but a bare minority. Hmmm. Interesting times Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
August1991 Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago Carney has a razor-thin majority - dependent on the NPD (look at the members) or BQ. For votes, he needs a good whip. Unlike Mulroney or Chretien, Carney is not a good caucus leader. Quote
August1991 Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Posted 11 hours ago I have always thought that a US President without partisan Senate support is a goner. And a Canadian federal PM without caucus support is a loser. Quote
CdnFox Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 2 hours ago, August1991 said: Carney has a razor-thin majority - dependent on the NPD (look at the members) or BQ. For votes, he needs a good whip. Unlike Mulroney or Chretien, Carney is not a good caucus leader. No, he has a strong minority. He does not have a majority. Agreed though that he doesn't seem to be a very good caucus leader Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
August1991 Posted 6 hours ago Author Report Posted 6 hours ago 3 hours ago, CdnFox said: No, he has a strong minority. He does not have a majority. Agreed though that he doesn't seem to be a very good caucus leader Correct. Razor-thin majority. ==== Have you read Crosbie's book No Holds Barred? In 1971 or so, he wanted to defeat Smallwood - a member from Labrador had the deciding vote. Such is politics. Carney is forced to do such deals now. Quote
August1991 Posted 6 hours ago Author Report Posted 6 hours ago I saw Mulroney in caucus. In his office, among cabinet ministers. In public, in private, he was a master. I saw Chretien in private and random crowds. He was remarkable. Chretien liked meeting people, kids in particular. Quote
August1991 Posted 6 hours ago Author Report Posted 6 hours ago Meech Lake 1995 According to the ever predictable CBC's Andrew Coyne and so-called Quebec expert Chantal Hebert: "Let's see." ==== Disagree. Carney did not win a clear majority. The PQ will win in 2026. Alberta will hold a referendum. (It will lose - but the vote will be higher than Quebec's 1980). Think: In 1980, 40% of people in Quebec wanted a sovereign state. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.