TreeBeard Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 (edited) oh wait…. No bombshells. Just some leaked private info. Illegally. Donald Trump’s former campaign lawyer is furious after his personal information and social security number were made public as part of this week’s release of unredacted JFK assassination files. “It’s absolutely outrageous. It’s sloppy, unprofessional,” Joseph diGenova, a long-time Trump supporter who formerly served as the president’s lawyer on the campaign trail, told The Washington Post. “It not only means identity theft, but I’ve had threats against me,” diGenova said. “In the past, I’ve had to report real threats against me to the FBI. There are dangerous nuts out there.” https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-lawyer-joseph-digenova-livid-as-jfk-files-leak-his-social-security-number-absolutely-outrageous/ Edited March 21 by TreeBeard 1 Quote
Hodad Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 (edited) 9 hours ago, TreeBeard said: oh wait…. No bombshells. Just some leaked private info. Illegally. Donald Trump’s former campaign lawyer is furious after his personal information and social security number were made public as part of this week’s release of unredacted JFK assassination files. “It’s absolutely outrageous. It’s sloppy, unprofessional,” Joseph diGenova, a long-time Trump supporter who formerly served as the president’s lawyer on the campaign trail, told The Washington Post. “It not only means identity theft, but I’ve had threats against me,” diGenova said. “In the past, I’ve had to report real threats against me to the FBI. There are dangerous nuts out there.” https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-lawyer-joseph-digenova-livid-as-jfk-files-leak-his-social-security-number-absolutely-outrageous/ I feel about as sorry for him as I do a dog fighting trainer who gets bit. If you work to enable a person who is --are best-- recklessly indifferent to the law, don't whine when your legal protections are disrespected by that person. Edited March 21 by Hodad 1 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 I did a deep dive after the last big release... Years ago. As I recall. The only new information was the names of CIA agents who had been working on this in any respect. Oswald was the lone gunman. Conspiracy culture flourished, though, after this event. Event. It did more damage than the actual assassination. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Scott75 Posted March 21 Report Posted March 21 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: I did a deep dive after the last big release... Years ago. As I recall. The only new information was the names of CIA agents who had been working on this in any respect. Oswald was the lone gunman. The House Select Committee debunked the idea that Oswald was the lone gunman way back in 1979. From an article I just found on its work in investigating the JFK assassination: ** The House Select Committee on Assassinations was the second major investigation of the JFK assassination, following the Warren Commission by nearly a decade and a half. The revelations of the Church Committee were profound in the 1970s, and efforts to re-investigate the assassinations of the 1960s picked up steam. The airing of the Zapruder film on television in 1975, showing Kennedy reacting “the wrong way” to a bullet from the rear, was a defining event which helped push the momentum over the top. Congress authorized an investigation into the murders of John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Chief Counsel Richard Sprague ran into early troubles, butting heads with the CIA over secrecy oaths among other matters. He was eventually forced to resign, and the investigation was taken over by G. Robert Blakey. After a few years of work, the House Committee issued a Final Assassinations Report, along with 12 appendix volumes on each of the murders. In the JFK case, the HSCA found that "Kennedy was probably killed as a result of a conspiracy," based in large part on acoustics evidence which captured the sound impulses of gunfire from more than one location in Dealey Plaza. [snip] Based on new evidence indicating CIA withholding of key information, HSCA Chief Counsel Robert Blakey in 2003 wrote a scathing letter about CIA obstruction of the HSCA inquiry: "I now no longer believe anything the Agency told the committee any further than I can obtain substantial corroboration for it from outside the Agency for its veracity." more ** Source: https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/HSCA.html Wikipedia words this finding differently, but seems to be pointing at the same result: ** Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that at least two gunmen fired at the President. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations. ** Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations Personally, I found Oliver Stone's film on JFK's assassination to be quite compelling. His film was based in part on 2 books, one of which I read a fair amount of a while back, this one to be precise: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/301804.Crossfire Edited March 21 by Scott75 Quote
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.