robosmith Posted March 17 Author Report Posted March 17 26 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Yes Dear. The sun will rise tomorrow... The "expert" YOU CITED, says you don't know. LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 (edited) 1 hour ago, Hodad said: Yes, that's EXACTLY what's going on. Look at that stupid tweet--because apparently some whackjob calling herself "Sandra Freedom" is all the source you need. Actually look at it. The Google screenshot of the NY times even references the quote from Walz's debut speech: “Thank you, Madam Vice President, for the trust you put in me. But maybe more so, thank you for bringing back the joy.” The campaign set the tone and explicitly made "joy" a talking point for the tone and tenor of the campaign. This isn't evidence of a conspiracy where all the news organizations got together to decide to describe the campaign as joyful--though that's certainly what you intend to imply. It's evidence of news organizations doing the basic job of reporting WTF is happening in the campaign. How about his: https://rumble.com/v5a84el-watch-compliant-media-spin-kamala-harris-all-about-joy-while-avoiding-inter.html At 7:00 to 7:40 MSNBC montage using joy to describe e the campaign as if it was their own word for it. Edited March 17 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Hodad Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 (edited) 17 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: How about his: At 7:00 to 7:40 MSNBC montage using joy to describe e the campaign as if it was their own word for it. I have no idea what this means. But whatever you're on about now, let's not gloss over the fact that you (and apparently "Sandra Freedom" want to make an issue of media outlets reporting the campaign direction using the exact word that was used on stage at the DNC to describe the campaign. As if it's a goddamn conspiracy. That's nuts. Edited March 17 by Hodad Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 17 Report Posted March 17 22 minutes ago, Hodad said: I have no idea what this means. But whatever you're on about now, let's not gloss over the fact that you (and apparently "Sandra Freedom" want to make an issue of media outlets reporting the campaign direction using the exact word that was used on stage at the DNC to describe the campaign. As if it's a goddamn conspiracy. That's nuts. The link dropped off for some reason. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.