gatomontes99 Posted January 21 Author Report Posted January 21 37 minutes ago, Black Dog said: You and I both know there's no evidence I could provide that you will find convincing or that won't be dismissed out of hand, so why bother engaging in the charade? If that's how you feel, why are you here? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted January 21 Report Posted January 21 18 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: If that's how you feel, why are you here? To stare at the freaks. Why are you here given you're not interested in dialogue? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 21 Author Report Posted January 21 8 minutes ago, Black Dog said: To stare at the freaks. Why are you here given you're not interested in dialogue? 🤔 🤨 😐 😔 Again. I would like to thank you for taking the time, and going out of your way, to prove me correct, once again. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted January 21 Report Posted January 21 33 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: 🤔 🤨 😐 😔 Again. I would like to thank you for taking the time, and going out of your way, to prove me correct, once again. That's a much more lucid reply than normal, so maybe our children is learning. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 21 Author Report Posted January 21 14 minutes ago, Black Dog said: That's a much more lucid reply than normal, so maybe our children is learning. Smh So after all that dialogue, you can't provide one example of your thesis and somehow you come away believing you've done well? I would say shocking, but it really isn't. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted January 21 Report Posted January 21 17 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Smh So after all that dialogue, you can't provide one example of your thesis and somehow you come away believing you've done well? I would say shocking, but it really isn't. I notice you didn't bother to dispute my assertion than any such effort on my part would be utterly wasted, which I take as an admission that I am correct. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 21 Author Report Posted January 21 1 hour ago, Black Dog said: I notice you didn't bother to dispute my assertion than any such effort on my part would be utterly wasted, which I take as an admission that I am correct. Demanding that you.. 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Prove it. ...is a form of dispute. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted January 22 Report Posted January 22 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Demanding that you.. ...is a form of dispute. Quote You and I both know there's no evidence I could provide that you will find convincing or that won't be dismissed out of hand, so why bother engaging in the charade? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 22 Author Report Posted January 22 12 minutes ago, Black Dog said: Great. So you made excuses while I tried to engage in dialogue and then you claimed: 3 hours ago, Black Dog said: Why are you here given you're not interested in dialogue? All you've done is make unfounded claims and then refuse to discuss them. It seems to me that, from the very first claim, you've been projecting. You say I'm not willing to have a dialogue while refusing to engage in meaningful dialogue. Maybe you are the one that is one of the most "irrational, emotionally fragile people alive lol. Your entire worldview is based on rage and grievance, everything flows from that. " Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Black Dog Posted January 22 Report Posted January 22 20 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Great. So you made excuses while I tried to engage in dialogue and then you claimed: All you've done is make unfounded claims and then refuse to discuss them. It seems to me that, from the very first claim, you've been projecting. You say I'm not willing to have a dialogue while refusing to engage in meaningful dialogue. Maybe you are the one that is one of the most "irrational, emotionally fragile people alive lol. Your entire worldview is based on rage and grievance, everything flows from that. " Again: any example I give, like the racist claims of legal immigrants eating pets, the repeated calls to use force against political enemies, the constant drumbeat of anger and vitriol towards LGBTQ people, you will reject. We do not speak the same language or operate in a shared reality, therefore "dialogue" is impossible. Instead I choose to mock your child-like credulity and dishonesty. Quote
CdnFox Posted January 22 Report Posted January 22 On 1/21/2025 at 5:27 AM, gatomontes99 said: Quote On 1/21/2025 at 5:09 AM, Nationalist said: So you were kidding? Man I just got up. Yeah. It was a sarcastic, lefty inspired, fairytale So, in Canada we call that "hook line and sinker" LOL (You just about had me too but fortunately I read his comment before I posted so I'm not quite as gullible almost sort of) Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted January 22 Author Report Posted January 22 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: So, in Canada we call that "hook line and sinker" LOL (You just about had me too but fortunately I read his comment before I posted so I'm not quite as gullible almost sort of) 🤪 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.