Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You and I both know there's no evidence I could provide that you will find convincing or that won't be dismissed out of hand, so why bother engaging in the charade?

If that's how you feel, why are you here?

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

To stare at the freaks. Why are you here given you're not interested in dialogue?

🤔

🤨

😐

😔

Again. I would like to thank you for taking the time, and going out of your way, to prove me correct, once again.

  • Downvote 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

🤔

🤨

😐

😔

Again. I would like to thank you for taking the time, and going out of your way, to prove me correct, once again.

That's a much more lucid reply than normal, so maybe our children is learning.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

That's a much more lucid reply than normal, so maybe our children is learning.

Smh

So after all that dialogue, you can't provide one example of your thesis and somehow you come away believing you've done well? I would say shocking, but it really isn't.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
17 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Smh

So after all that dialogue, you can't provide one example of your thesis and somehow you come away believing you've done well? I would say shocking, but it really isn't.

I notice you didn't bother to dispute my assertion than any such effort on my part would be utterly wasted, which I take as an admission that I am correct.

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

I notice you didn't bother to dispute my assertion than any such effort on my part would be utterly wasted, which I take as an admission that I am correct.

Demanding that you..

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Prove it.

...is a form of dispute.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Demanding that you..

...is a form of dispute.

 

Quote

You and I both know there's no evidence I could provide that you will find convincing or that won't be dismissed out of hand, so why bother engaging in the charade?

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

 

 

Great. So you made excuses while I tried to engage in dialogue and then you claimed:

3 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Why are you here given you're not interested in dialogue?

All you've done is make unfounded claims and then refuse to discuss them. It seems to me that, from the very first claim, you've been projecting. You say I'm not willing to have a dialogue while refusing to engage in meaningful dialogue. Maybe you are the one that is one of the most "irrational, emotionally fragile people alive lol. Your entire worldview is based on rage and grievance, everything flows from that. "

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Great. So you made excuses while I tried to engage in dialogue and then you claimed:

All you've done is make unfounded claims and then refuse to discuss them. It seems to me that, from the very first claim, you've been projecting. You say I'm not willing to have a dialogue while refusing to engage in meaningful dialogue. Maybe you are the one that is one of the most "irrational, emotionally fragile people alive lol. Your entire worldview is based on rage and grievance, everything flows from that. "

Again: any example I give, like the racist claims of legal immigrants eating pets, the repeated calls to use force against political enemies, the constant drumbeat of anger and vitriol towards LGBTQ people, you will reject.

We do not speak the same language or operate in a shared reality, therefore "dialogue" is impossible. Instead I choose to mock your child-like credulity and dishonesty.

Posted
On 1/21/2025 at 5:27 AM, gatomontes99 said:
 
Quote

 

On 1/21/2025 at 5:09 AM, Nationalist said:

So you were kidding? Man I just got up.

 

 

Yeah. It was a sarcastic, lefty inspired, fairytale

 

 

So, in Canada we call that "hook line and sinker"  LOL

(You just about had me too but fortunately I read his comment before I posted so I'm not quite as gullible almost sort of) :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

So, in Canada we call that "hook line and sinker"  LOL

(You just about had me too but fortunately I read his comment before I posted so I'm not quite as gullible almost sort of) :) 

🤪

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...