Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

I quoted empirical studies.

You posted a blog.

 

@gatomontes99 probably thinks COVID is no worse than the common cold. If a very lethal pandemic ever occurred again, it would decimate the American population. If COVID taught us anything, it's American MAGA cultists do not have common sense.

Edited by DUI_Offender
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Delude yourself all you want.

Funny how you never post citations to support your nonsense. 

Why do you suppose that is?

You lie. You can't back it up. The source you did provide doesn't support you. 

What source is it I need here?

This is your lie. You can't back it up. 

You: Unicorns exist! I have one in my basement!

Me: No they don't, you are a liar. 

You: Prove me wrong! What is your source!

 

  • Thanks 1

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Only in your tiny mind.

 

Well, his and the rest of the free world but sure carry on

1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

@gatomontes99 probably thinks COVID is no worse than the common cold. If a very lethal pandemic ever occurred again, it would decimate the American population. If COVID taught us anything, it's American MAGA cultists do not have common sense.

Remember when we were discussing not lying in the other thread?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
13 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I identify as straight.

So do I.

The difference between the two of us is you are a homophobe and i am not.

According to empirical studies,  some homophobes are actually closeted gays themselves

You appear to get quite upset over that fact, which leads me to accept the possibility that you may be one of those homophobes those empirical studies are talking about.

Comprede Queen Bee?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

You a man of God?

What another great example!

Imagine if you tried to tell me that God is real because you say so, it is a fact, and that it is my job to disprove it. 

You are finally starting to get it! Good for you. I was worried the concept would be above your head or that you would be too dishonest to admit it. 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, User said:

What another great example!

Imagine if you tried to tell me that God is real because you say so, it is a fact, and that it is my job to disprove it. 

You are finally starting to get it! Good for you. I was worried the concept would be above your head or that you would be too dishonest to admit it. 

 

Are you a man of God?

I ask because MAGAs and religion go hand in hand, as they both require a disconnect from reality in order to participate. 

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Are you a man of God?

I ask because MAGAs and religion go hand in had, because they both require a disconnect from reality in order to participate. 

I ask again, are you just ignorant or a liar?

I can share the demographics for those who profess to believe in God if you need me to. 

 

Edited by User

 

 

Posted
Just now, CrakHoBarbie said:

I'm neither.

Now, are you a man of God?

You just made an ignorant or lying comment about who believes in God. 

Since you refuse to answer, I will presume you know better and are a liar. 

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, User said:

You just made an ignorant or lying comment about who believes in God. 

Since you refuse to answer, I will presume you know better and are a liar. 

 

It's comical how skittish you are about leaving any room for me to point out your obvious hypocrisy. 

I've noticed that with most of the alt right fools here on this forum. If yall aren't posting in an echo chamber, you get aggravated and start lashing out (to the best of your abilities, which are meager).

Now, are you a man of God?

Posted
5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

It's comical how skittish you are about leaving any room for me to point out your obvious hypocrisy. 

I've noticed that with most of the alt right fools here on this forum. If yall aren't posting in an echo chamber, you get aggravated and start lashing out (to the best of your abilities, which are meager).

Now, are you a man of God?

If it is so obvious, just point it out. 

 

 

 

Posted
25 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

So do I.

The difference between the two of us is you are a homophobe and i am not.

According to empirical studies,  some homophobes are actually closeted gays themselves

You appear to get quite upset over that fact, which leads me to accept the possibility that you may be one of those homophobes those empirical studies are talking about.

Comprede Queen Bee?

 

Lmao...I love how it has changed to some...but some, somehow, became proof that I am secretly gay.

You are so bad at this.

You don't see it, because crazy can't see sane, but we can all see that you are resorting to name calling because you feel threatened and you don't have the mental acuity to sustain a logical, emotion-free argument.

You've posted a study that wasn't empirical and admits that the findings are likely flawed. You posted a paper that refuted your core assertion. You can't talk to the purpose of the thread. You've derailed this hole thread from a Genral promising (to a potential enemy) to sabotage an American attack. Potentially causing the deaths of the soldiers he's supposed to protect.

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

So... not so obvious after all. 

If you are a man of God, it's painfully obvious.

You see, all yall right wing douchnozzles don't support your contentions with citations.  You do this with many aspects of your life. Your belief in a supernatural, all seeing all knowing master in the sky for example.

That belief has pre-conditioned yall to believing things that you can't prove.

Your all bluster and emotion. Verbally denigrating anyone who doesn't toe the line to your unsubstantiated beliefs.

See.

It's obvious. 

Well, at least to those of us who rely on objective evidence for our declarations. 

1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lmao...I love how it has changed to some...but some, somehow, became proof that I am secretly gay.

You are so bad at this.

You don't see it, because crazy can't see sane, but we can all see that you are resorting to name calling because you feel threatened and you don't have the mental acuity to sustain a logical, emotion-free argument.

You've posted a study that wasn't empirical and admits that the findings are likely flawed. You posted a paper that refuted your core assertion. You can't talk to the purpose of the thread. You've derailed this hole thread from a Genral promising (to a potential enemy) to sabotage an American attack. Potentially causing the deaths of the soldiers he's supposed to protect.

 

Carry on with your delusion.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

If you are a man of God, it's painfully obvious....

What does any of this have to do with your repeated lying about what RFK did?

 

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

Carry on with your delusion.

 

You don't have to quote me to talk to yourself.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
53 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

You a man of God?

Are you assuming his gender? What a horrible person you are!

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
7 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

It's what rfks lawyer did.

Try and keep up.

I can keep up just fine. You are a dishonest liar. 

You claimed that RFK told his attorney to do this. 

You are a liar. 

"he told his attorney to ask"
 

 

 

Posted
Just now, User said:

You are a dishonest liar. 

You claimed that RFK told his attorney to do this. 
 

Isn't it odd how RFKs (our new head of health and human services) main advisor,  Aaron Siri, just happened to petition to suspend approval for the life-saving vaccine.

Kennedy, a vocal opponent of the polio vaccine, has repeatedly stated he believes the polio vaccine causes autism. 

What a coincidence that Robert's main advisor has petitioned against the polio vaccine.

So, although Robert denies his support of suspending the polio vaccines approval, his past statements tell a different story.

 


 
Posted
Just now, CrakHoBarbie said:

Isn't it odd how RFKs (our new head of health and human services) main advisor,  Aaron Siri, just happened to petition to suspend approval for the life-saving vaccine.

Kennedy, a vocal opponent of the polio vaccine, has repeatedly stated he believes the polio vaccine causes autism. 

What a coincidence that Robert's main advisor has petitioned against the polio vaccine.

So, although Robert denies his support of suspending the polio vaccines approval, his past statements tell a different story.

The only thing odd here is that you asserted something that isn't true and instead of just admitting that, you go on for days playing these dumb dishonest games. 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, User said:

The only thing odd here is that you asserted something that isn't true and instead of just admitting that, you go on for days playing these dumb dishonest games. 

 

Nobody's forcing you to continue replying, you halfwit.

 

Edited by CrakHoBarbie

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...