ABC news settled with Donnie after accusing him of raping E Jean Carroll

[WestCanMan]

Here:

https://www.thecut.com/article/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html

Just notice that "the door closes behind him", and he kisses her and she laughs, takes off her tights or whatever and she laughs again. He grabs her arms at first but then he must let them go to pull down her tights, take off his coat, unzip his pants, pull out his dick, etc, and she's not doing anything with her hands in all that time? Not saying anything like "no"? 

He must have gotten her tights down below her knees if he got his dick in, and she had to spread her legs and tilt her pelvis for him as well, unless he has some mad skills and a bent dick, but then she ran out with her tights still down. That would be really awkward, right? 

She has all these vivid memories of what they were both wearing, down to the different designers and the colours, and she remembers her conversation with him at length, but doesn't remember how far his penis got in? Or if he jizzed? Huh? Did guys used to fake orgasms with her? And she can't remember is she waited for the elevator or went down the escalator in 4" heels? She didn't know if she was raped, she needed to be told? She mentions that the camera footage is gone 20 yrs later, but it would have still been there later that day, or the next day.  

What about this: "But even if it had been captured on tape, depending on the position of the camera, it would be very difficult to see the man unzipping his pants, because he was wearing a topcoat. The struggle might simply have read as “sexy.” 🤣 A "sexy" looking rape? Ooooooh, any man who said that would instantly be cancelled for life.

Her own words lol.

How could her "fighting him off in an epic struggle, pulling up her tights while she was trying to run away in 4-inch heels" look sexy? No one would mistake that for sexy. She's full of shit. She knows what it looked like, and why it looked like that. Sluuuuuuut. 

 

That's the dumbest "rape" story I have ever heard. Women who have actually been raped are offended by BS stories like that. 

[User]

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

she's not doing anything with her hands in all that time? Not saying anything like "no"? 

Listen, quite frankly, I am just tired of your dishonesty and willful ignorance. 

She clearly wrote that she did in fact try to fight him off. She also wrote that once she did fight him off she ran away. 

None of that is consensual activity or green light go. 

 

 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, User said:

Listen, quite frankly, I am just tired of your dishonesty and willful ignorance. 

She clearly wrote that she did in fact try to fight him off. She also wrote that once she did fight him off she ran away. 

None of that is consensual activity or green light go. 

Right, but when she "fought him off":

1. she did it with one hand
2. in 4" heels
3.  with her tights down below her knees
4. he let her go right away
5. and IN HER OWN WORDS... "depending on the position of the camera... The struggle might simply have read as “sexy.”

I'm tired of your shameless lying and blatant stupidity. SHE DIDN'T DESCRIBE A "RAPE" YOU M0R0N. She described an incredibly sleazy but totally consensual sexual encounter which she was able to terminate, even after it got to the steamiest part of all. 

 

She willfully brought him into the changeroom to model lingerie for him.

He pushed her against the wall and kissed her and she giggled.

He pulled down her tights and she giggled.

Is that rape? Of course not. Not even by 1%.

He put his fingers in her crotch, she said nothing. Never offered resistance of any kind.

Then when he got his penis partway or maybe completely in, she physically indicated that she wanted to stop by shoving him away with one arm, while wearing 4" high heels, and the encounter ended while still possibly 'looking sexy' to use her own words. 

Not a rape, l'user. 

[User]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm tired of your shameless lying and blatant stupidity. SHE DIDN'T DESCRIBE A "RAPE" YOU M0R0N. She described an incredibly sleazy but totally consensual sexual encounter which she was able to terminate, even after it got to the steamiest part of all. 

There is nothing "totally consensual" about shoving a woman so hard she hits her head, then immediately grabbing her and kissing her, after she pushes you away, you then start trying to pull her tights down so as to penetrate her all while she is fighting you. 

You have no shame. I thought your stupid and shameless lies pushing Putin propaganda were bad enough. 

Consensual sexual encounters do not end with the person running away as soon as they can break free from you. 

 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, User said:

There is nothing "totally consensual" about shoving a woman so hard she hits her head, then immediately grabbing her and kissing her, after she pushes you away, you then start trying to pull her tights down so as to penetrate her all while she is fighting you. 

You have no shame. I thought your stupid and shameless lies pushing Putin propaganda were bad enough. 

Consensual sexual encounters do not end with the person running away as soon as they can break free from you. 

 

Wrong. He "shoved her so hard that she hit her head, and kissed her, and then she giggled"

Those are her words you stupid lying piece of shit.

And don't forget that the act of saying that she would model lingerie for him and then bringing him into the changeroom with her are acts of implicit consent. Obviously something's gonna happen in there, and he was just playing with her. She wouldn't have giggled if she felt like she was being raped. 

Giggling is just another form of consent. 

Have you ever made out with a girl and asked for consent every time you touched her in a different spot, or kissed her somewhere? That's creepy, dude. You do your thing, she does her thing, and if something isn't cool then let them know.

Basically, be a man or go jerk off. 

And don't forget that you're only hearing her side of the story. That means that you take everything that she said and slide it 15%-30% towards the middle. Or, if she lies as much as you, move it 70% towards the middle. 

And that's if there even is a story. There's a really good chance that there is no actual story, because none of it makes sense and she can't even guess what year it happened.

If she went into a court of law to get him convicted of rape and she couldn't even say what year or what month it happened, there would be no case. EJC has no claim to call him a rapist. She's a dumb slut with a big mouth and you're her stooge. 

E J Carroll: "Even if there was a camera it probably looked sexy when I was pulling my tights back on and fighting off a rapist" 😇

User: "OMG, THERE WAS DEFINITELY A RAPE!!!!"

I gotta hand it to you, by leftard standards this is actually a pretty good one, because it's not anonymous, even if she can't name her witnesses, the year, the month, the date, how she left the store, if he even ejaculated, etc.

Oh, and one more thing: "She couldn't remember if he ejaculated...."

The first DNA case in the US was in 1986, almost ten years before she claims that she was raped. If she really talked to her friend, and she really thought that she was raped, then they would have made a point of getting some of the sperm off of her, or at least determined if there was any. 

"I don't remember if he ejaculated but I remember my coat and shoes" 🤣 You're a f'ing ret4rd.

And FWIW, Clinton actually raped someone. It was a violent rape where he caused her physical injuries, ad there was a witness, dates, etc. Trump actually never raped EJC, period. 

[User]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Those are her words you stupid lying piece of shit.

Yes, he shoved her so hard she hit her head. 

That is how every consensual sexual encounter goes... right?

You are a sick person. 

Giggling != Consent, not when they are pushing you away. Not when they are fighting you off and then run away.