gatomontes99 Posted November 28, 2024 Report Posted November 28, 2024 (edited) 5 hours ago, robosmith said: That's NOT the way debate works. YOU have to provide EVIDENCE before anything needs to be PROVEN WRONG. FOS LIES is NOT EVIDENCE because they are PROVEN LIARS. Duh He did prove it. He posted the information. If you think it is a lie, it is on you to prove it wrong. But you can't, so you attack him, the sources and even me. What you are really saying when you say FOS LIES is that you don't have the intellectual fortitude to debate the topic. Your childish outbursts border on extinction events. Edited November 28, 2024 by gatomontes99 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
robosmith Posted November 28, 2024 Report Posted November 28, 2024 10 hours ago, DUI_Offender said: As of today, Trump received 76.9 million votes, opposed to Harris 74.6 million. So realistically, 6.7 million people who voted for Biden in 2020, either did not voted, switched over to Trump or a third party candidate. The 14 million figure was at the end of Election night, and did not account for all the votes, especially in California and the West Coast states, where the Democrats won. The point is, while Trump got a marginal 1% bump over 2020, Harris dramatically underperformed Biden in 2020. This is why I was so disappointed when the Democratic Party was so quick to abandon Joe for an unlikely alternative. 1 Quote
NAME REMOVED Posted November 28, 2024 Report Posted November 28, 2024 Just now, robosmith said: The point is, while Trump got a marginal 1% bump over 2020, Harris dramatically underperformed Biden in 2020. This is why I was so disappointed when the Democratic Party was so quick to abandon Joe for an unlikely alternative. The problem lies with the Democratic Party itself. In the past 3 elections, They have ran with candidates that were far from ideal. I've heard unconfirmed reports that Biden's inner circle knew he was suffering from dementia, as early as 2022. Speculation is, that Jill Biden encouraged Joe not to step down. This proved to be disastrous. It would not have been the first time a US President has had early onset dementia kick in before they left office (Reagan was showing symptoms in his last year of office). Biden really should have announced he was not going to run in late 2023. Harris, in retrospect, like Hilary Clinton, was a weak candidate. Quote
CdnFox Posted November 28, 2024 Report Posted November 28, 2024 15 minutes ago, robosmith said: The point is, while Trump got a marginal 1% bump over 2020, Harris dramatically underperformed Biden in 2020. This is why I was so disappointed when the Democratic Party was so quick to abandon Joe for an unlikely alternative. You went on and on about how great she was. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.