Wildass conspiracy theory

[impartialobserver]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Whatever, stupid. 

There were no holes in my post about the "vaxes prevent the spread of covid" post either.

You know as well as anyone that the reason we forced young, healthy people to vax was to "stop the spread". 

You know as well as anyone that the covid jab does not "stop the spread" now. It doesn't even slow it down, and no one is saying that it does. Vax apologists have had to backpeddle their efficacy claims all the way to "deaths are only up because the number of infections is up by a far wider margin now", and the only step left now is to admit that the jab was a total failure. 

You were pretending not to be interested in the posts that said "The jabs aren't stopping the spread of covid". You know that was major bone of contention for the anti-jabbing crowd because THERE WAS A FACKING FREEDOM CONVOY, and that's what it was about.

In the dead of the Canadian winter, people drove all the way across Canada and parked their cars and rigs in downtown Ottawa and slept there for WEEKS!

Those people were "conspiracy theorists" by your definition of the word. They endured the freezing cold and the slander from our prime minister and sat there for days while the MSM said "The reason they are there is because of covid disinformation". 

Well how do you like your disinformation, jackass? Do you want it with a side of "Who's laughing now, motherfuccer"? Because that's all you get. 

Suck it down, princess. 

More covid.. you like talking to yourself. 

"You were pretending not to be interested in the posts that said "The jabs aren't stopping the spread of covid"." I challenge to quote myself saying this.. .the forum is searchable. You have me confused with someone probably. But this is what you get for putting passion/righteousness in front of getting it right. 

i am cold/clinical when I am brought into a fraud investigation. I have no idea about the race/politics of the accused. I only care about two things.. proving that the amount is correct (usually it is not) and proving that they did not follow established law. I go into it with zero assumptions. I have at the end of six months told the higher ups that they have the wrong person or have incorrect details. 

[WestCanMan]

43 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

More covid.. you like talking to yourself. 

"You were pretending not to be interested in the posts that said "The jabs aren't stopping the spread of covid"." I challenge to quote myself saying this.. .the forum is searchable. You have me confused with someone probably. But this is what you get for putting passion/righteousness in front of getting it right. 

i am cold/clinical when I am brought into a fraud investigation. I have no idea about the race/politics of the accused. I only care about two things.. proving that the amount is correct (usually it is not) and proving that they did not follow established law. I go into it with zero assumptions. I have at the end of six months told the higher ups that they have the wrong person or have incorrect details. 

The topic is "conspiracy theories". 

You were decidedly on the wrong side of history on that conspiracy theory, so of course you don't like it, but at least be man enough to admit it now. 

[impartialobserver]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The topic is "conspiracy theories". 

You were decidedly on the wrong side of history on that conspiracy theory, so of course you don't like it, but at least be man enough to admit it now. 

And I have stated numerous times that I do not BELIEVE in any of them regardless of context, who peddles them, etc. In most cases, real life is not all that interesting. Every time I take a deep dive onto one (which covid is not one of them.. just to be clear), it can be explained by simple human nature and not fantastical scenarios that demand dozens of assumptions come true. Again, so that you can move on... this is not about COVID. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

And I have stated numerous times that I do not BELIEVE in any of them regardless of context, who peddles them, etc. 

That's just plain ignorance. You have a closed mind.

What's worse is that you just let CNN propaganda take hold in your brain without resistance, and don't allow it to be challenged. 

[impartialobserver]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

That's just plain ignorance. You have a closed mind.

What's worse is that you just let CNN propaganda take hold in your brain without resistance, and don't allow it to be challenged. 

What is sad is that you have such a terrible case of dementia. Every time that I decide to waste my time with you.. you start on the CNN thread. And then I tell you that I do not watch CNN, do not watch live TV in any way, etc. Surely you tire of repeating yourself. 

Conspiracy theories (regardless of topic or who starts them (right and left) are for the intellectually lazy.  When something has a 99.9% chance of either being wrong, unprovable, or simply has too many gaps.. I will go with probability. Being wrong 1 out of 10000 times versus the converse.. I will take the sure bet which is plain old boring reality. To really understand a topic.. you have to do more than buy into fabrications (which conspiracy theories are). It takes time and a discerning mind which you have yet to show that you have. 

interesting how you only mention covid and act like its the only conspiracy theory. There are thousands of them.. Obsessed much, are we?

Edited November 22, 2024 by impartialobserver