Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well you sure flip flop back and forth on that quite a bit.

Nope my argument has been solid and consistent for weeks and you've done nothing to even remotely touch any premise of it.

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

 all people have equal opportunity to vote. The free part usually refers to people not being compelled to vote for one person or another.

A. Yep these are ethical standards for voting. I see you simply don't know what the word "ethics" means (I'm shocked). You should go look it up and expand your vocabulary.

B. There are naturally a lot more ethical standards beyond these to a fair election. For example, counting the votes correctly, not changing the voting laws right before an election, having a secret ballot, outlawing the buying of votes, having impartial election bodies, having an open nomination process,  etc etc etc.

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Oh look

More of your typical method-- to straight up lie about sone specific claim and then predictably refuse to support it with even one fact.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Matthew said:

Nope my argument has been solid and consistent for weeks and you've done nothing to even remotely touch any premise of it.

Your argument hasn't been solid or consistent for seconds never mind weeks :)

About the closest you came to an argument other than just electoral College bad was trying to claim that it's not a democracy. And of course that got shot down right away.

Now I don't think you even have a point or an argument, I think you just pissy about losing and you're just rattling on hoping something will stick at some point

 

Quote

A. Yep these are ethical standards for voting. I see you simply don't know what the word "ethics" means (I'm shocked). You should go look it up and expand your vocabulary.

LOL it's not even remotely close to being an 'ethical' standard. :)  So i see we're back to you creating fake definitions to try to suit your derangements :) 

Free and fair is an objective not subjective thing.  It's not ethical, it's functional. But I guess I shouldn't be surprised you don't know what ethics are

A. Yep these are ethical standards for voting. I see you simply don't know what the word "ethics" means (I'm shocked). You should go look it up and expand your vocabulary.

Quote

B. There are naturally a lot more ethical standards beyond these to a fair election. For example, counting the votes correctly, not changing the voting laws right before an election, having a secret ballot, outlawing the buying of votes, having impartial election bodies, having an open nomination process,  etc etc etc.

Those aren't ethics. Those are mechanics. Those are simply conditions necessary to fulfill the definition of people electing the leadership. It's like saying that because you have to light a fire to start cooking your meal a fire is ethical. It's just not how it works

Quote


More of your typical method-- to straight up lie about sone specific claim and then predictably refuse to support it with even one fact.

 

That's what you say when you can't refute facts or argue the point :) 

LOL   do you think this is going well for you kid? Like do you think you DON"T look like a retarded goon who just flails wildly? Asking for a friend :)  

 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 10/31/2024 at 8:02 PM, CdnFox said:

the closest you came to an argument other than just electoral College bad was trying to claim that it's not a democracy.

That has been my only argument and it stands unrefuted. And for that matter it's not even a controversial assertion.

It's like I'm arguing that the earth is round and you're responding by saying it's not round because your yard is flat.

You on the other hand have no argument in this thread other than to reflexively disagree with me for no apparent reason and with no relevant facts.

On 10/31/2024 at 8:02 PM, CdnFox said:

Those aren't ethics.

Principles of how an election should properly occur, including any operational rules of fairness are most definitely ethics.

"noun A set of principles of right conduct." (American Heritage)

"the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group" (Mirriam Webster)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,916
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Раймо
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Раймо earned a badge
      First Post
    • Раймо earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • MDP went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • MDP earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • MDP went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...