Jump to content

The immigrants most valuable to the Canadian economy are now the most likely to leave


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Perspektiv said:

You're not munching on anything nor enjoying this. You don't have the intelligence to get out of it.

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
Just now, CdnFox said:

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

You can't debate, and lose at life. Always will.

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

yeah.... those were facts kid ;) 

No, i said 'based on that logic'".   You argued that your intelligence is directly associated with your parents.  I pointed out that based on that logic your parents must have been basset hounds. This is because you're so slow witted.  And not because i think your parents ACTUALLY are basset hounds OR that i agree  your intellect is a direct result of them being basset hounds. 

Yeash. 

I didn't express any opinions as to the nature of inheritable traits at all. I said 'based on THAT logic..." And that means only the logic expressed by you and contained in THAT sentance. Which ALSO did not mention genetics. 

This is why you always wind up looking Dumber than the dumbest kid in grade 8 whenever we talk. You don't pay attention. You don't think things through. You get excited and you make stupid claims that I can easily shoot down because you didn't sit back and actually read and think about what was being said

You did not make that argument. You simply said it was because you had parents who you claimed were intelligent and that your intelligent is similar. You made no argument as to whether or not that was due to their methods or techniques of upbringing, they're genetics, or any other such thing you can't retcon it after the fact. "That" logic is ONLY the logic you expressed, not how you arrived at it. 

And  it still wouldn't be ironic because you'd have no expectation that I would disagree with the genetic element, so now you're wrong twice :) 

And further, my opinion HAS to matter because for it to be ironic you would have to have an expectation of what MY opinion would be. Otherwise how could my opinion be the opposite of what you expect. 

So that's THREE strikes. Yer out kid :)  

"that" logic did not offer any opinion on genetics. Only that your intellect was what it was because your parents were intelligent.  You didn't say "so i inherited it".   They may just have raised you to think better because they were intelligent. 

Further i did not acknowledge your logic as valid i simply noted that "BASED on THAT .... "  so it can't be ironic. 

 

LOL  well you sure managed to dig yourself in deeper there kid  :)  

You REALLY need to take some basic lessons in logic and reason. 

Based on that logic means based on logic, not on a claim of fact. It is different for you to suggest that I am wrong about my parents being intelligent than to suggest that my logic that traits are heritable means that I am a basset hound (which is, in fact, a contradiction).

 

You are e not a good judge of who is slow witted because you are severely retarded...evidenced by this very conversation.

Edited by Five of swords
Posted
25 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

You can't debate, and lose at life. Always will.

:P :P :P 

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
22 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Based on that logic means based on logic, not on a claim of fact.

I think you got a little confused there kiddo :)

 

Quote

It is different for you to suggest that I am wrong about my parents being intelligent than to suggest that my logic that traits are heritable means that I am a basset hound (which is, in fact, a contradiction).

Yeah - your train of thought is off the rails, into the town and just caught fire 

Nobody said you were wrong about your parents. 

You didn't offer any 'Logic' regarding traits being inheritable. You said your parents were smart so it was no surprise you were. Genetics didn't get mentioned at all. 

24 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

ou are e not a good judge of who is slow witted because you are severely retarded...

You are e not a good judge of who is slow witted because you are severely retarded...evidenced by this very conversation.

LOLOL called it :)   whenever you get shown up you always break down and claim your stupidity is someone else's fault :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

think you got a little confused there

You're constantly confused.

15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOLOL called it :)

See. You peacefully debating on display.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

You're constantly confused.

See. You peacefully debating on display.

Sure Kid 😊

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
23 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

How many immigrants in Canada? You're pointing to a minute percentage, as a reasoning to hate migrants.

What's the 'minute percentage'? It seems to be enough to crowd our streets in every city with near-daily demonstrations for Hamas and Hezbollah. It seems enough that 90% of the murder suspects on the Toronto most wanted list are immigrants. It seems enough that the public housing projects are filled with immigrants. 

Get this through your head. Only about 15% of immigrants are ever tested for any kind of skill, for education, for language abilities, or anything else. The rest, almost all from the third world, come in as refugees or sponsored. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

 

Get this through your head. Only about 15% of immigrants are ever tested for any kind of skill, for education, for language abilities, or anything else. The rest, almost all from the third world, come in as refugees or sponsored. 

And that 15% is the 15% that's leaving.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

In my opinion, what would change the status on immigration is the inauguration of a white supremacist gov. Which I doubt exist in Canada.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...