Montgomery Burns Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Previously--on this forum--I have linked to an article in a Arab newspaper (the liberal MSM refused to report this) of George Galloway admitting that the "progressives" were on the side of the Jihadists in their fight to destroy America. Duh. Like any one with common sense didn't know that. Progressive liberals have done everything in their power to prop up the Hussein Regime and make sure those darned brown-skinned Iraqis continue to live a life of brutal tyranny. After all, those subhuman Iraqis are not capable or deserving to live in a democracy! Here's round 2--Gorgeous George and Uday Hussein falling all over themselves complimenting each other on tape. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
newbie Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 And let's add this to your collection: http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/im...damrumsfeld.htm Quote
newbie Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Oh, and Monty, if the Sun on-line is your latest source of up-to-date credible info, I think it's time to start buying the National Enquirer. Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted January 28, 2006 Author Report Posted January 28, 2006 Arrghh! I should have checked the videotape before posting. They now have a different videotape than they did yesterday. Oh well. You will have to make do with the article. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Montgomery Burns Posted January 28, 2006 Author Report Posted January 28, 2006 Oh, and Monty, if the Sun on-line is your latest source of up-to-date credible info, I think it's time to start buying the National Enquirer. I guess I should have used CBS (of fake memos infamy) or the NY Times (of bogus 380 tons of weapons of mass, er I mean "medium" destruction that disappeared right under the very nose of those dumb US military personnel) infamy. Or perhaps the "Heil Harper" CBC? BBC, Guardian, Independent? Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Shakeyhands Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Boy, Gorgeous George really gets you conservative... is it because he made the US senate his bitches? Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Argus Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Boy, Gorgeous George really gets you conservative... is it because he made the US senate his bitches? No, because he took money, like so many Frenchmen, Germans and Russians, to help keep Hussein in power. The oil for food program was a vast snakepit of corruption and bribery, and gorgeous george was right there up to his snout. It's not so much that I despise those who supported Hussein, as I despise those who pretended to oppose sanctions and the US out of a sense of moral piety and concern for the Iraqi people, when they were really just being bribed. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Shakeyhands Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Yet despite what you are saying, I don't think there has been any proof brought forward despite a lengthy look at both his personal and business books? And along the same vain, I saw a picture of Saddam and Rumsfeld recentlyt shaking hands... the horror! Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Argus Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Yet despite what you are saying, I don't think there has been any proof brought forward despite a lengthy look at both his personal and business books? This is along the lines of those who said that until a judge had assessed all the legally admissable evidence and pronounced sentence, there was no crime and the Liberals were all innoncent. As with this, I don't require a court pronouncement and an abundance of legally admissable evidence to suggest guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. Galloway is a hypocritical scumbag. And along the same vain, I saw a picture of Saddam and Rumsfeld recentlyt shaking hands... the horror! Political leaders shake hands with each other all the time. It doesn't imply any great love or affection - though I suppose one could make that argument about Chretien's delighted hugs for China's dictators. In any event, what does that have to do with the hypocrisy of those with oil dollars stuffed down their pants self righteously condemning the damage sanctions were causing Iraq? Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
YankAbroad Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Gorgeous George is busy self-destructing at the moment. His appearance on "Celebrity Big Brother" has his popularity in his district in freefall. Meanwhile, it looks increasingly likely that he's going to be nailed by UK authorities for not being 100% honest about his financial relationship with Hussein. Don't even get me started about the domestic terrorism that his "Respect" party represents, or the massive amounts of financial support that they receive from Muslim fundamentalist politicians and groups which are every bit as frightening as American Dominionist Christian groups. Quote
Shakeyhands Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Yet despite what you are saying, I don't think there has been any proof brought forward despite a lengthy look at both his personal and business books? This is along the lines of those who said that until a judge had assessed all the legally admissable evidence and pronounced sentence, there was no crime and the Liberals were all innoncent. As with this, I don't require a court pronouncement and an abundance of legally admissable evidence to suggest guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. Galloway is a hypocritical scumbag. And along the same vain, I saw a picture of Saddam and Rumsfeld recentlyt shaking hands... the horror! Political leaders shake hands with each other all the time. It doesn't imply any great love or affection - though I suppose one could make that argument about Chretien's delighted hugs for China's dictators. In any event, what does that have to do with the hypocrisy of those with oil dollars stuffed down their pants self righteously condemning the damage sanctions were causing Iraq? Well yeah Argus, until there is proof that other than those named then we assume innocence until proven otherwise. And as far as shaking hands, you're correct. I suppose it was the whole putting him in power that was throwing me off. Sorry. Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Argus Posted January 28, 2006 Report Posted January 28, 2006 Well yeah Argus, until there is proof that other than those named then we assume innocence until proven otherwise.And as far as shaking hands, you're correct. I suppose it was the whole putting him in power that was throwing me off. Sorry. You can assume what you want. I am free to judge based on his statements, his actions, others statements and actions. And the US did not put Hussein into power. That's a hoary old cliche from whorry old leftists. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Shady Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 And let's add this to your collection Ahh newbie, if I only had a nickle for everytime a liberal posted a picture of Rumsfeld and Hussein. I'd be a rich man. Well, yes, the world was much different 25 years ago. Good point. However, I'll see your picture and raise you one of Albright toasting champagne with Kim Jong Ill. Link Quote
newbie Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 And let's add this to your collection Ahh newbie, if I only had a nickle for everytime a liberal posted a picture of Rumsfeld and Hussein. I'd be a rich man. Well, yes, the world was much different 25 years ago. Good point. However, I'll see your picture and raise you one of Albright toasting champagne with Kim Jong Ill. Link Oh, and don't forget the Governor General supposedly toasting separation?? And you make my point. Photos don't tell the whole story. And with the rag that Monty got his pic from, well nothing more needs to be said. Quote
Shady Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 Photos don't tell the whole story You're quite right, however, words do. Monty was correct in pointing out Galloway's praise of Saddam and his sons. You can read some of his own disgusting praise of tyrants all over the word. Quote
Black Dog Posted January 31, 2006 Report Posted January 31, 2006 No, because he took money, like so many Frenchmen, Germans and Russians, to help keep Hussein in power. The oil for food program was a vast snakepit of corruption and bribery, and gorgeous george was right there up to his snout. Actually, oil-for-food was a small snakepit of corruption, overshadowed by the far more lucrative oil smuggling regime brokered by the U.S. government to assist its alllies in Jordan. But you don't hear much about that from Monty and Shady and their ilk. And the US did not put Hussein into power. That's a hoary old cliche from whorry old leftists. Technically, the U.S. put the Ba'ath party in power, Hussein came along later. Quote
newbie Posted February 2, 2006 Report Posted February 2, 2006 Actually, oil-for-food was a small snakepit of corruption, overshadowed by the far more lucrative oil smuggling regime brokered by the U.S. government to assist its alllies in Jordan. But you don't hear much about that from Monty and Shady and their ilk. Man, I almost forgot about that BD. Thanks for bringing that up. http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/02/02/iraq.oil.smuggle/ Quote
YankAbroad Posted February 2, 2006 Report Posted February 2, 2006 And even as this goes on, George Galloway remains a patronising, fascistic and odious twat. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.