Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

According to this CBC article:

"

The researchers found that the carbon pricing applied to big industrial polluters will cut between 53 million and 90 million tonnes by 2030, while the pricing on consumers will cut between 19 million and 22 million tonnes. "

So estimates carbon taxes on consumers will cut aprox 20 mega tons by 2030.  That is the claim. Whether it is true is doubtful.

Now let's look at the facts.

Presently global CO2 emissions by humans are estimated to be 26.4 Gt , that is 26.4 giga tons.  A giga ton is 1,000 times a mega ton.   So if Canada's carbon tax reduces CO2 emissions from Canada by 20 mega tons by 2030, that will reduce human emission by one-thousandth of the total human emissions.

Can you see the absurdity of thinking that carbon taxes on Canadians will make any difference at all?

Do you really think reducing human emissions by 1/1000 of total human emissions will affect climate change.  Seriously.  People need to give their head a shake.  

These facts have been kept hidden from Canadians.  We are constantly being lied to.

What's behind the carbon tax, and does it work? | CBC News

 

Edited by blackbird
Posted

And if we're being honest - when you actually look at how they arrived at those figures for 'cuts' they're wildly insanely optimistic.

Here's a copy. it's from 2021.  Note that there's nothing newer and the CBC is choosing to report on this 2 year old paper now in such a way you'd think it's new 'research"

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9

 Basically it's a guy reviewing other people's research around the world and combining it to arrive at an opinion.  Now - such papers CAN have validity by pulling a lot of facts from a lot of sources together to arrive at a conclusion.  BUt - the danger is also that they can pull in the flaws from all those works as well and reach the wrong conclusion - and he uses info from all over the world at random to reach his desired conclusion.

If the carbon tax worked - AT ALL - the gov't would be tripping over itself to fund studies that proved it does. There aren't any. Specific studies in BC where the tax has been around longer showed that it had NO effect in reducing emissions (which was it's stated objective) and at best slowed growth of emissions by about 5 percent or so which basically is nothing.

Carbon tax is a fraud. Until there  is an economical and viable alternative people will still use carbon period.

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,023
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Fred Kurtz
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...