Montgomery Burns Posted November 1, 2005 Report Posted November 1, 2005 Hitler never attacked or invaded the US (ditto for Canada) when they declared war on Germany. For that matter neither did Japan. The Japanese Airforce - and no other part of their military - attacked a US military base located on a US possession taken from the indigenous island population. Japan was a "liberating" army; liberating Hawaii from the American "occupation". The US had no right to join in the war in Europe nor the war in the Pacific. Saddam should be back in power. The people who brought down the buildings in NYC all died in the attempt so no retribution is necessary there either. Unless or until a WMD is used, their existence is not to be believed. Besides how can it be possible to hide a "suitcase nuke" or a few gallons of Anthrax by burying it somewhere in a area the size of Iraq? It's just NOT possible. There are NO WMD in Iraq or any of the Arab States. The bottom line: The US military should not only be withdrawn from Iraq but every place they are deployed, and then disbanded. Reagan "won" the war against the USSR, there is nobody looking to hurt them. China? No - they're just a hard working people and a good source for cheap goods to be sold at Wal-Mart. Korea? No, those people dying in the camps are no more important then the people who died in Iraq. It's the perfect argument! If Korea had oil, Bush would invade and attack. The US would care and should want to get involved. They don't have oil - so let the citizens die. The new US philosophy for foreign involvement should be that if Koreans kill Koreans, Sudanese kill Sudanese, Rwandans are just killing Rwandans - don't look to the US or it's citizens to care. It's just not their job. If the US only left everyone else alone, disarmed; the world would be Eden-like. Bush should be brought up on war crimes, impeached, and jailed. He wasn't smart enough to analyze the information provided and decided to believe something that was, to date, not proven. He compounded his failure by passing on the information and acting upon it! So, just to recap: Saddam should be back in power. He should be allowed to sue for false imprisonment - I think a $3 billion dollar settlement appropriate (paid for by the wealthy; the only ones who received a taxcut from Bush); the lawyer-laden Democrat Party would have no problem representing him. All the 1.5 million Iraqis who were killed or mangled by Saddam, were just not thinking politically correct for the greater good of Iraq. That $3 billion will go a long way to the rebuilding of the palaces as well as the prisons and torture dungeons - the far left can never have enough of them. Bush arrested. Military disbanded. Then all would be right in the world. The US would be a "nice" country and would not be hated (it's NOT jealousy!! :angry:) by the rest of the world, the rest of the world that hates the US so much that they devour American culture like Michael Moore devours food at an all-you-can-eat buffet. A country so hated that people never ever try to drift 90 miles on a raft through shark-infested waters to reach America. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
PocketRocket Posted November 1, 2005 Report Posted November 1, 2005 Man, that's the longest-winded trolling attempt I've seen in ages. Quote I need another coffee
Black Dog Posted November 1, 2005 Report Posted November 1, 2005 Man, that's the longest-winded trolling attempt I've seen in ages. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So why feed it? Ignore it and it will go away. Quote "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit
Shady Posted November 1, 2005 Report Posted November 1, 2005 One thing you missed. Not only would Saddam still be in power, but Kuwait would still be occupied by Iraq. Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted November 1, 2005 Author Report Posted November 1, 2005 One thing you missed. Not only would Saddam still be in power, but Kuwait would still be occupied by Iraq. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Oops. Forgot that. Thanks for pointing that out. Nice to hear from someone other than the trolls. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.