kimmy Posted January 20, 2005 Report Posted January 20, 2005 This is apparently a developing story, with details not yet clear, but the guy on CTV News-net says that the trouble stems from an investigation into employee shenanigans with time-cards (ie, you punch me in when you get in, I'll punch you out when I leave, and we'll both get paid for more hours than we worked.) A hidden camera may have been used to investigate the situation, which hurt peoples feelings. The end result: hundreds or thousands of passengers unable to get out of Toronto. Hundreds or thousands more have arrived in Toronto and can't get their suitcases. This will of course affect flights all across Canada, as well. Planes are stuck. People are angry. -kimmy Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
August1991 Posted January 20, 2005 Report Posted January 20, 2005 If I understand properly, Air Canada is burning up a big chunk of cash lent to them by German banks. How many months Air Canada got? How about we set up a Death Watch book? Quote
theloniusfleabag Posted January 20, 2005 Report Posted January 20, 2005 Dear August1991, If I understand properly, Air Canada is burning up a big chunk of cash lent to them by German banks.How many months Air Canada got? How about we set up a Death Watch book? I have been on a real 'Death Watch' before, and I couldn't count on the Feds to step in, over and over, to stave off the inevitable.Air Canada is a mis-managed, dying, farce of a company. Milton and the unions (in that order) have doomed it to failure. If it goes away, something viable will take it's place. Why has the gov't tried to keep it afloat for so long? Is it so they don't have to re-negotiate new gov't contracts with a new company? Quote Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?
August1991 Posted January 20, 2005 Report Posted January 20, 2005 Is it so they don't have to re-negotiate new gov't contracts with a new company?I have flown on Air Canada jets where I have looked around the cabin and tried to guess the percentage of passengers flying at government expense or government union expense. (Too often, I came up with a guess of over 50%. The game is a variation of "Find the civil servant".)BTW, these people all fly at full fare economy. (One way Montreal-Toronto is $475.) Quote
kimmy Posted January 20, 2005 Author Report Posted January 20, 2005 Why has the gov't tried to keep it afloat for so long? Am I correct in assuming that it's because those in power fear that leaving the air travel industry to private business could mean drastic change and leave some Canadians without access to air travel? -kimmy Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
ndpnic Posted January 23, 2005 Report Posted January 23, 2005 I think the government should steo in and sieze control of the whole air line industry. If anything, that temper tantrum by the baggage handlers proved that Air travel should be government run, along with the insurance companies etc..... Quote
kimmy Posted January 24, 2005 Author Report Posted January 24, 2005 I think the government should steo in and sieze control of the whole air line industry.If anything, that temper tantrum by the baggage handlers proved that Air travel should be government run, along with the insurance companies etc..... I don't think WestJet has ever had a labour dispute... Some might suggest that the root of Air Canada's problems stem from labour relations policies that they established back when they were a crown corporation. -kimmy Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
theloniusfleabag Posted January 24, 2005 Report Posted January 24, 2005 Dear ndpnic, I think the government should steo in and sieze control of the whole air line industry.If anything, that temper tantrum by the baggage handlers proved that Air travel should be government run, along with the insurance companies etc..... Nonsense. The reason will follow kimmy's quote...Dear kimmy, I don't think WestJet has ever had a labour dispute...Some might suggest that the root of Air Canada's problems stem from labour relations policies that they established back when they were a crown corporation. WestJet is not unionized, and the company treats it's employees fairly. Air Canada has two major problems. Milton is the #1problem, running the company into the ground with decision-making and no fiscal responsibility, because he knows the gov't will bail him out again. Secondly, the unions are killing the airline by making it non-competative. WestJet, and other airlines, will fill the void once Air Canada dies. I don't personally care if it is KLM or Nunavut Air, if there is a demand and a profit to be made, room should be made for companies that operate in a fiscally responsible manner. There is also Greyhound and a host of other 'alternative competitors' that would be able to move passengers (though not at the same speed, yet) and if the 'market' was left alone by the gov't, as it is in my industry, the best businesses will make it happen. Quote Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.