GostHacked Posted October 21, 2017 Report Share Posted October 21, 2017 http://www.ci.dickinson.tx.us/ http://www.ci.dickinson.tx.us/DocumentCenter/View/2016 #11 - Verification not to Boycott Israel. By executing this Agreement below, the Applicant verifies that the Applicant: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement. Why does this clause need to exist in order to help people affected by natural disasters? What is the purpose of this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altai Posted October 22, 2017 Report Share Posted October 22, 2017 Now I can imagine the replies, they are going to say "Texas is a private district". You know when you question freedom of speech, they say "blah blah because its a private something blah blah blah". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted October 22, 2017 Report Share Posted October 22, 2017 Quote They are referring to House Bill 89, which came into force on September 1. But Rep. Phil King, who authored the legislation, told NPR he was baffled about why it was being applied here. "It's not uncommon when you've got brand-new legislation, particularly substantive legislation, for it to be misinterpreted or for there to be some confusion," King says. "And I think that's all that's going on here. I think it's just a simple misunderstanding by the city." http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/10/20/559070267/need-hurricane-aid-in-one-texas-city-if-you-boycott-israel-you-may-be-out-of-luc So, the author of the legislation thinks it's an error. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hot enough Posted October 22, 2017 Report Share Posted October 22, 2017 (edited) Quote "As Israel's ... What is good for the goose ... . "As Nazi Germany's number one trading partner in the United States, [.........] is proud to reaffirm its support for the people of Nazi Germany and we will continue to build on our historic partnership," Abbott stated. "Anti-Nazi Germany policies are anti-[.......] policies, and we will not tolerate such actions against an important ally." Edited October 22, 2017 by hot enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted October 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2017 On 10/22/2017 at 3:33 PM, hot enough said: What is good for the goose ... . "As Nazi Germany's number one trading partner in the United States, [.........] is proud to reaffirm its support for the people of Nazi Germany and we will continue to build on our historic partnership," Abbott stated. "Anti-Nazi Germany policies are anti-[.......] policies, and we will not tolerate such actions against an important ally." How the times have changed. I have delved deeper into the BDS thing too, and that seems to get very interesting as to legislated support for Israel in the USA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.