Political indoctrination in public schools?

[eyeball]

45 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said:

Well thanks, I think maybe I should enlighten you.  You clearly think that a site like Wikipedia, who absolutely anyone can write whatever they want, is good sage information, but I'll try to explain things for the slow minded using an example;

OK, During the OJ Simpson trial, the prosecution argued that OJ's motive was that he was controlling and a spousal abuser, and therefore was a prime candidate for murder, the defence argued that this fact meant nothing - both sides gave "alternate facts".  The prosecution argued that some 80% of abused women who end up murdered, are murdered by their mate.  The defense argued that only 1 out of 250,000 cases of spousal abuse ends in a death - and won the case because (they argued) spousal abuse does not equate to murder.

So, what do we have?  Fact one: 80% of abused women who end up dead are killed by their mate - Wow, that's really high!

                                      Fact two: 1 in 250,000 abused women end up killed - Well, that's not a very high number at all!

You see, facts can mean different things and when the term "alternative facts" is applied, it's a way of looking at the facts from a different perspective.  We do it on this forum all the time, and the media is using it to a tee to try and bring down Trump.

Here's another one: One in 10,000 (or something like that) dates ends in rape, therefore men aren't actually mad stalking rapists.  Feminists will use the alternative fact that 68% of rapes happen during a date - and therefore men are good for nothing rapists.

I asked how Conway used the term, not you.

Quote

The defense argued that only 1 out of 250,000 cases of spousal abuse ends in a death - and won the case because (they argued) spousal abuse does not equate to murder.

I thought it was crime scene contamination and technical mistakes by forensics investigators that won Simpson's case, perhaps you got your alternative info from Conway.  Three jurors pointed to police errors in Madam Foreman, a book they co-wrote on the trial.

Edited March 27, 2017 by eyeball

[taxme]

6 hours ago, hot enough said:

Thank you for your indirect admission that the US and Canada had a program of genocide against Native Americans and First Nations peoples.

Please, you are making a [unspeakable word] of yourself, taxme. Let's use total numbers killed by western terrorism versus "radical Islam" terrorism. It is not even anywhere close to being equal. The total numbers killed from illegal invasions, aka war crimes and the time frame that western terrorism has been going on versus "radical Islam" is also highly disproportionate. 

If we were really to check, deeply, we would likely find out that many or most of these "radical Islam" attacks were false flags, just like Operation Gladio. US lies have a long and storied history. 

You never showed up in the threads that showed, scientifically, that the US official 911story was and is a fable. Why are all you open, honest, nothing is off the table Platos so afraid of actually discussing the real issues? 

The native indians were genociding each other long before the Europeans arrived on the scene in North America. What was done to them probably was not the right way to have gone but at the time it seemed like the right thing to do. At least they were civilized, and brought into the about to become the modern world that we know today. At least they are not knocking each other off anymore thanks to the Europeans. Something it would appear that you would like to ignore. The whole of the Middle East long before Europeans entered on to the scene were always at war. They most likely knocked off each other by the millions in their religious wars. 

I have already admitted in past threads that 9/11 was a big farce, and it was no doubt started by the Zionists, in order to try and take control of the Arabs money and their resources. And what I have noticed also that every time there is a terrorist attack the perpetrator/s always end up dead. Whether they killed themselves rather than be taken prisoner or they were possibly set up to commit Jihad somewhere by someone or group, and then had to be killed so they could not talk later but this we will never know. 

[taxme]

6 hours ago, hot enough said:

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group; [Check, done by Canada and the USA]

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; [Check, done by Canada and the USA]

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; [Check, done by Canada and the USA]

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [Check, done by Canada and the USA]

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. [Check, done by Canada and the USA]

Is there any better example of the political indoctrination that has gone on in western schools, UK, USA, Canada, Australia, NZ, [the latter two can be added to the [Check, done by Canada and the USA]]  ... than these genocides being hidden at all education levels right up to the highest university levels?

How much better than the Nazis are we?

There have been many instances in the past where countries were taken over by other countries. Nothing new here. It has been happening pretty much since time began. So, what's your point? The communists of Russia took over many European countries after the WW2 was over. Arabs did it. Africans did it. Asians did it. This is how things have been done for thousands of years. So, quit with the anti-European stuff and what they did, and trying to make it look as though old whitey has always been the problem. 

Multiculturalism is genocide. It is part of a program and agenda implemented to try and destroy the people of a country by bringing in many races from all over the world, and mixing their culture, traditions, languages, religions, and heritage into the host country to try and break down that host countries way of life and values and culture and traditions. believe it or not.