Why all the worldwide turmoil? (9/11 thread)

[bush_cheney2004]

Just now, hot enough said:

Are you going to describe these "greater energy densities,

 

No, I am going to continue mocking your ridiculous, unproven assertions.  

Arab hijackers did not use the new super duper uber nanothermite...they used USA super Boeing airliners.

[hot enough]

5 minutes ago, Omni said:

It seems trying to provide some facts scares you silly. We still haven't heard how much explosive it would take and how you would install it. Now you are saying there was no hijackers? Talk about silly.

Not "now", I have been saying it for a long time. Let me explain it to you once more; molten/vaporized steel means there were no hijackers; WTC7 free fall means there were no hijackers; WTCs 1, 2 and 7's controlled demolitions means there were no hijackers; ...; ... ;... ;... .

Only the folks who rigged the controlled demolitions would know that. It's a new super powerful nanothermite. Do you even know what thermite is?

[Omni]

2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Are you going to describe these "greater energy densities, like those found in fully fueled Boeing 767-200 airliners", or is this just another boondoggle, a big distraction to get folks to not see or think about the new USA super nanothermite, a new generation of very powerful, easily controlled, safe and with great ignition control, explosives that can be painted on, that will cut thru steel, concrete, anything, like a hot knife thru butter. 

So I guess if there were no hijackers than what do you think happened? Did US government employees take over the planes using their laptops and then direct the planes into the buildings? I guess they also must have been able to switch the radios off so the pilots couldn't call out a mayday. Oh but then there were a few inadvertent calls made by the hijackers that weren't there but were caught on tape by ATC. 

[hot enough]

6 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

No, I am going to continue mocking your ridiculous, unproven assertions.  

Arab hijackers did not use the new super duper uber nanothermite...they used USA super Boeing airliners.

With fabrications, innuendo, trickery, all the usual things. 

[Omni]

2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Do you even know what thermite is?

Yes, do you? And how much do you need to blow up a WTC tower?

[hot enough]

6 minutes ago, Omni said:

So I guess if there were no hijackers than what do you think happened?

That's for the courts. 

[bush_cheney2004]

Just now, hot enough said:

With fabrications, innuendo, trickery, all the usual things. 

 

So sorry, but many members here are very experienced at this 911 conspiracy dance.

You are very, very late to the game.  Good luck....

 

[hot enough]

5 minutes ago, Omni said:

Yes, do you? And how much do you need to blow up a WTC tower?

The facts are, nanothermite was found in WTC dust. End of this story.

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Not "now", I have been saying it for a long time. Let me explain it to you once more; molten/vaporized steel means there were no hijackers; WTC7 free fall means there were no hijackers; WTCs 1, 2 and 7's controlled demolitions means there were no hijackers; ...; ... ;... ;... .

Only the folks who rigged the controlled demolitions would know that. It's a new super powerful nanothermite. Do you even know what thermite is?

Actually, none of those things mean there were no hijackers. The planes flying off in directions they weren't supposed to mean that there were, and you still haven't given your opinion on why those planes did that if there weren't 

Edited April 3, 2017 by bcsapper

[Omni]

Just now, hot enough said:

The facts are, nanothermite was found in WTC dust. End of this story.

Right then, close your eyes and plug your ears. 

[hot enough]

5 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

So sorry, but many members here are very experienced at this 911 conspiracy dance.

You are very, very late to the game.  Good luck....

 

You are very very very unknowledgeable on this topic, as are all many members.

[Omni]

Just now, hot enough said:

You are very very very unknowledgeable on this topic, as are all many members.

And apparently right off the bat you have no knowledge of aviation and how planes and air traffic control works.

[bush_cheney2004]

Just now, hot enough said:

You are very very very unknowledgeable on this topic, as are all many members.

 

And yet, you are still losing the debate...badly.  

"all many members"....which is it ?

[hot enough]

6 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Actually, none of those things mean there were no hijackers.

That just makes the US official conspiracy theory way way wackier than it already is. It's noted that you are comfortable with that.

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

That just makes the US official conspiracy theory way way wackier than it already is. It's noted that you are comfortable with that.

You probably noted that in my first post.

Why did the planes fly in the wrong directions?

Edited April 3, 2017 by bcsapper
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they aren't even there - not Blaise Pascal

[Omni]

2 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Why did the planes fly in the wrong directions?

Suicidal hijackers can have that effect.

[bush_cheney2004]

Mohammad Atta did not seek U.S. training on super duper nanothermite, but instead preferred U.S. flight school training:

 

Quote

"Dear sir, we are a small group of young men from different Arab countries. Now we are living in Germany since a while for study purposes. We would like to start training for the career of airline professional pilots. In this field we haven't yet any knowledge but we are ready to undergo an intensive training program (up to ATP and eventually higher)."

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=757

 

 

Link to image

Edited April 3, 2017 by Michael Hardner
added image link

[hot enough]

1 hour ago, segnosaur said:

Uhhh... no. Not on the material that was leaking from the building, that  you claim was melted steel but was more likely melted aluminum (which has a much lower melting point than steel.)

If you truly believe in "science" then explain why it can't be aluminium, since:

- There is a huge supply of it (from the plane)

- Temperatures in the building were high enough to melt alimimum

Occam's razor. I suggest you try it. The fact that you seem to cling to the "melted steel" idea when a more logical explaination exists flies in the face of rational thinking.

It was molten steel. NIST said it was molten aluminum but they used bad science, yet again, in their dive to the bottom.

[Omni]

2 minutes ago, hot enough said:

It was molten steel. NIST said it was molten aluminum but they used bad science, yet again, in their dive to the bottom.

Maybe explain your idea of how you would use thermite to shear a vertical beam.

[Omni]

Just now, Omni said:

Maybe explain your idea of how you would use thermite to shear a vertical beam.

Oh yes and while you are at it, explain why the planes went off in wrong directions.

[hot enough]

10 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Mohammad Atta did not seek U.S. training on super duper nanothermite, but instead preferred U.S. flight school training:

Of course he didn't. The falsely accused hijackers would never have had access to this new non-commercially available nanothermite. These are US proprietary explosives. 

Here is a video for you folks to NOT watch, and to NOT discuss, great scientists that you are. 

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

 

[hot enough]

9 minutes ago, Omni said:

Maybe explain your idea of how you would use thermite to shear a vertical beam.

Just posted. Watch and learn, a lot, if you had an open mind, a scientific mind.

[hot enough]

It also deals with the molten steel coming out of WTC2 minutes before the collapse. 

[Omni]

4 minutes ago, hot enough said:

It also deals with the molten steel coming out of WTC2 minutes before the collapse. 

You're still ignoring pertinent questions. This shows your lack of knowledge.

[bush_cheney2004]

So many WTC beams....so little super duper thermite !

Going back down highjacker memory lane to debunk thermite (of any kind) yet again....

http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm