Jump to content

Terror against an Americans


Recommended Posts

Hello, all!

I don't understand position of Al_Qaeda. The problem is in question - are they understand, what they do?

Today they kill 100, tomorrow will killing 100 and so... .

Why? Is Coran say them to go kill? NO! They barbarize Coran and Allah's ideology.

Give them an H-Bomb, it's similar to give a finger to Satan!

Sin .st: People mudering.

Sin 2: Killing a world.

Al_Qaeda friends Taleban - 3.rd sin - animal killing and crippling.

Saddam Hussein was a murder of Iraq's High Priest El Sadr's father, but El Sadr cooperate with Iraq's marauders - Husseins friends. Why?

I know, if in my contry comming some - that was in 1939. year, when comes Russians. Who helps? Nothing! Anybody helper will be our hero, but nobody comes!

How many peoples kill Saddam Hussein's dietary regime? 5000? 10000? Who more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, if in my contry comming some - that was in 1939. year, when comes Russians.

May I ask you, Edgar, which nation you hail from?

How many peoples kill Saddam Hussein's dietary regime? 5000? 10000? Who more?

Dietary regime? Not entirely with you here. If you are asking for an estimate of how many died during his regime then your estimates are extememly low. I'll wait to see what you mean.

Give them an H-Bomb, it's similar to give a finger to Satan!

Not sure what you mean here either. Using a H-Bomb could be contrued as doing the Devil's work for him. Giving him the finger is an act of defiance.

Its probably just that I'm dimwitted but could I please ask you to rewrite all your questions and set out your ideas again since I'm having some difficulty following them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bin Laden's last press release, in its entirety:

Praise be to Allah who created the creation for his worship and commanded them to be just and permitted the wronged one to retaliate against the oppressor in kind. To proceed:

1. Peace be upon he who follows the guidance: People of America this talk of mine is for you and concerns the ideal way to prevent another Manhattan, and deals with the war and its causes and results.

Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom.

If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example - Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 - may Allah have mercy on them.

No, we fight because we are free men who don't sleep under oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation, just as you lay waste to our nation. So shall we lay waste to yours.

No one except a dumb thief plays with the security of others and then makes himself believe he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for its causes, in order to prevent it happening again.

But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.

So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken, for you to consider.

I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced.

I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.

The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond.

In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.

And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.

This means the oppressing and embargoing to death of millions as Bush Sr did in Iraq in the greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has ever known, and it means the throwing of millions of pounds of bombs and explosives at millions of children - also in Iraq - as Bush Jr did, in order to remove an old agent and replace him with a new puppet to assist in the pilfering of Iraq's oil and other outrages.

So with these images and their like as their background, the events of September 11th came as a reply to those great wrongs, should a man be blamed for defending his sanctuary?

Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor in kind, objectionable terrorism? If it is such, then it is unavoidable for us.

This is the message which I sought to communicate to you in word and deed, repeatedly, for years before September 11th.

And you can read this, if you wish, in my interview with Scott in Time Magazine in 1996, or with Peter Arnett on CNN in 1997, or my meeting with John Weiner in 1998.

You can observe it practically, if you wish, in Kenya and Tanzania and in Aden. And you can read it in my interview with Abdul Bari Atwan, as well as my interviews with Robert Fisk.

The latter is one of your compatriots and co-religionists and I consider him to be neutral. So are the pretenders of freedom at the White House and the channels controlled by them able to run an interview with him? So that he may relay to the American people what he has understood from us to be the reasons for our fight against you?

If you were to avoid these reasons, you will have taken the correct path that will lead America to the security that it was in before September 11th. This concerned the causes of the war.

As for its results, they have been, by the grace of Allah, positive and enormous, and have, by all standards, exceeded all expectations. This is due to many factors, chief among them, that we have found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents.

Our experience with them is lengthy, and both types are replete with those who are characterised by pride, arrogance, greed and misappropriation of wealth. This resemblance began after the visits of Bush Sr to the region.

At a time when some of our compatriots were dazzled by America and hoping that these visits would have an effect on our countries, all of a sudden he was affected by those monarchies and military regimes, and became envious of their remaining decades in their positions, to embezzle the public wealth of the nation without supervision or accounting.

So he took dictatorship and suppression of freedoms to his son and they named it the Patriot Act, under the pretence of fighting terrorism. In addition, Bush sanctioned the installing of sons as state governors, and didn't forget to import expertise in election fraud from the region's presidents to Florida to be made use of in moments of difficulty.

All that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to provoke and bait this administration. All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies.

This is in addition to our having experience in using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers, as we, alongside the mujahidin, bled Russia for 10 years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat.

All Praise is due to Allah.

So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah.

That being said, those who say that al-Qaida has won against the administration in the White House or that the administration has lost in this war have not been precise, because when one scrutinises the results, one cannot say that al-Qaida is the sole factor in achieving those spectacular gains.

Rather, the policy of the White House that demands the opening of war fronts to keep busy their various corporations - whether they be working in the field of arms or oil or reconstruction - has helped al-Qaida to achieve these enormous results.

And so it has appeared to some analysts and diplomats that the White House and us are playing as one team towards the economic goals of the United States, even if the intentions differ.

And it was to these sorts of notions and their like that the British diplomat and others were referring in their lectures at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. [When they pointed out that] for example, al-Qaida spent $500,000 on the event, while America, in the incident and its aftermath, lost - according to the lowest estimate - more than $500 billion.

Meaning that every dollar of al-Qaida defeated a million dollars by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs.

As for the size of the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.

And even more dangerous and bitter for America is that the mujahidin recently forced Bush to resort to emergency funds to continue the fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is evidence of the success of the bleed-until-bankruptcy plan - with Allah's permission.

It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Halliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is ... you.

It is the American people and their economy. And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within 20 minutes, before Bush and his administration notice.

It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would abandon 50,000 of his citizens in the twin towers to face those great horrors alone, the time when they most needed him.

But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers, we were given three times the period required to execute the operations - all praise is due to Allah.

And it's no secret to you that the thinkers and perceptive ones from among the Americans warned Bush before the war and told him: "All that you want for securing America and removing the weapons of mass destruction - assuming they exist - is available to you, and the nations of the world are with you in the inspections, and it is in the interest of America that it not be thrust into an unjustified war with an unknown outcome."

But the darkness of the black gold blurred his vision and insight, and he gave priority to private interests over the public interests of America.

So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future. He fits the saying "like the naughty she-goat who used her hoof to dig up a knife from under the earth".

So I say to you, over 15,000 of our people have been killed and tens of thousands injured, while more than a thousand of you have been killed and more than 10,000 injured. And Bush's hands are stained with the blood of all those killed from both sides, all for the sake of oil and keeping their private companies in business.

Be aware that it is the nation who punishes the weak man when he causes the killing of one of its citizens for money, while letting the powerful one get off, when he causes the killing of more than 1000 of its sons, also for money.

And the same goes for your allies in Palestine. They terrorise the women and children, and kill and capture the men as they lie sleeping with their families on the mattresses, that you may recall that for every action, there is a reaction.

Finally, it behooves you to reflect on the last wills and testaments of the thousands who left you on the 11th as they gestured in despair. They are important testaments, which should be studied and researched.

Among the most important of what I read in them was some prose in their gestures before the collapse, where they say: "How mistaken we were to have allowed the White House to implement its aggressive foreign policies against the weak without supervision."

It is as if they were telling you, the people of America: "Hold to account those who have caused us to be killed, and happy is he who learns from others' mistakes."

And among that which I read in their gestures is a verse of poetry. "Injustice chases its people, and how unhealthy the bed of tyranny."

As has been said: "An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure."

And know that: "It is better to return to the truth than persist in error." And that the wise man doesn't squander his security, wealth and children for the sake of the liar in the White House.

In conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your security is not in the hands of Kerry, nor Bush, nor al-Qaida. No.

Your security is in your own hands. And every state that doesn't play with our security has automatically guaranteed its own security.

And Allah is our Guardian and Helper, while you have no Guardian or Helper. All peace be upon he who follows the Guidance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that.
OBL blames America for permitting Israel to invade Lebanon.
The answer is simple: Because the United States has long targeted the countries most of these terrorists live in.
America randomly targets countries? Why hasn't it targetted Canada in the past 100 years or so?

This conflict is much more fundamental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear August1991,

America randomly targets countries? Why hasn't it targetted Canada in the past 100 years or so?

This conflict is much more fundamental.

I have suggested to you to read "Imperial Hubris:Why America is Losing the War on Terror", and you thought it must be some sort of 'junior-level apologist'. Now the 'anonymous' author has been revealed to be the CIA's Chief of Counter-Terrorism, whose desk was the desk for Osama Bin-Laden.

It seems you don't (or won't) believe the foremost analyst for the CIA, and you won't believe Osama himself. I'm not sure who else you could turn to for clarification, but they are both telling you that these events and attacks are not random.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee, do you think it might have something to do with fossil fuels???

(By the way, I neither used nor implied the word "randomly.")

Do you mean the US has not attacked Canada because we have "fossil fuels"?

I interjected the word "randomly" because that's the implication of your argument. The US randomly picks countries and attacks them.

I have suggested to you to read "Imperial Hubris:Why America is Losing the War on Terror", and you thought it must be some sort of 'junior-level apologist'.
Thelonious, I got a copy and I'm in the process of doing that now. Yes, I find it interesting and well informed. I will hold my judgment until finished.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean the US has not attacked Canada because we have "fossil fuels"?

Not at all. The Middle East has a far greater supply of fossils fuels, and it is not as easily controlled as Canada, which many Americans consider the 51st state.

I interjected the word "randomly" because that's the implication of your argument.  The US randomly picks countries and attacks them.

Holy cow, I suggest you go back and read my post again. I implied exactly the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OBL blames America for permitting Israel to invade Lebanon.

So do I. Without American permission and support, they'd never have done it.

I don't have a link for OBL's release that I posted, I got it off another forum. I think it was originally from Al Jazeera's website, but I can't find it on there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

America randomly targets countries?  Why hasn't it targeted Canada in the past 100 years or so?

Gee, do you think it might have something to do with fossil fuels???

(By the way, I neither used nor implied the word "randomly.")

Why hasn't America targeted Canada; probably because we hand over our oil resources and a majority of our sources are American controlled, already. They are looking to control the Middle East. That is the reason they armed and Backed Israel in its aggressions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OBL blames America for permitting Israel to invade Lebanon.
So do I. Without American permission and support, they'd never have done it.
Did the Syrians also get American permission to invade Lebanon?
Do you mean the US has not attacked Canada because we have "fossil fuels"?
Not at all. The Middle East has a far greater supply of fossils fuels, and it is not as easily controlled as Canada, which many Americans consider the 51st state.
Canadian governments collect all royalties on oil produced, as do Middle Eastern governments. American oil companies pay the world price for both Canadian and Middle Eastern oil.

If the oil argument were true, the US should have invaded Cabinda, Gabon and Bahrein long ago.

BTW, do you know what a PSA is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the issue isn't oil, it's about being "pushed around". Hmmm.

Don't play dense (although you may be a little thick headed) the USA gets the resources it needs without needing to resort to force. They may pay royalties but that is not the issue. The middle east could shut down the pipeline and the greedy american consumerism and war machines would grind to a halt without a ready supply whatever the cost. duh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
The title of his thread suggests he's asking why terrorists are targeting the United States.

The answer is simple: Because the United States has long targeted the countries most of these terrorists live in.

Yeah. But isn't that the reason for any military to exist? To defend a country's interests and fend off any enemy advances. Most if not all of the American attacks on the terrorist harbouring countries came after either a) an attack on American interests or B) ample warning to expel the terrorists from said country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't play dense (although you may be a little thick headed) the USA gets the resources it needs without needing to resort to force. They may pay royalties but that is not the issue. The middle east could shut down the pipeline and the greedy american consumerism and war machines would grind to a halt without a ready supply whatever the cost. duh

Go look in your closet Ceasar. Tell me which article of clothing or tool whatever is made in an oil producing Middle Eastern country. Just one item out of the thousands you have in your home.is all I ask. (Don't try and give me a bottle of Israeli wine or we'll need to start another thread.)

Now, wondering, if they produce nothing that we buy other than oil, how do they feed people? And what effect of shutting down production would it have on the peole there? No oil=no money=no buying power=nothing to buy or eat.

Selling to the Euros is a grand idea, however, they all work on a capitalistic system same as we all do. Highest bidder gets the goods. To think that anybody is ggoing to starve people so they can make a political statement is idiocy and counter to everything you believe. Rethink your statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, wondering, if they produce nothing that we buy other than oil, how do they feed people?

We are not the only consumers in the world; they could easily sell their oil to China which is a growing consumer. Even the USA newspaper noted a concern that Canada could start selling our oil to China.

I try to buy Canadian made goods; so don't worry about my closet. I do know Louis Vuitton staff uniforms had several item made in Morrocco. I believe many high end carpets are produced in the Middle East.

I am not a wine drinker but we produce world class wine in BC don't need or want your Israeli wine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not the only consumers in the world; they could easily sell their oil to China which is a growing consumer. Even the USA newspaper noted a concern that Canada could start selling our oil to China.

Well of course they could but they won't, why? Easy. If they did, the US would find alternataive sources and pay those alternative sources more money. The Arabs would be short shifting themselves and before long, would start to try and sell to the US again to make more money. The USA though, would not buy from them as the supply would be unpredictable.

OPEC is a business organisation, not a political left wing revenge club. They can and have done what you say but the repercussions hurt them more than the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well of course they could but they won't, why? Easy. If they did, the US would find alternataive sources and pay those alternative sources more money. The Arabs would be short shifting themselves and before long, would start to try and sell to the US again to make more money. The USA though, would not buy from them as the supply would be unpredictable.

Dream on. Canada should start selling our oil to China too. Teach the Americans to trade according to the rules instead of their bullying ways. They might have to learn to abide by the rules. It is quicker and easier to trade with the USA but if they want to be a***oles.

Oh, by the way; the Americans are not that rich anymore; they are in debt up to their ying yang and will be for a long long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,713
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...