My Three New Theories Transcending General Relativity

[Exegesisme]

To be blunt, this receiving messages from 'super-meditation' sounds like schizophrenia. Maybe you need to get mental health help?

The webpage you linked to doesn't answer my question about testability. Could you please quantify the magnitude of the difference in G that you would experience on Earth vs Mars?

Maybe you need some trank as you target the person not the content. Our discussion should be ended at here! You should say "sorry" on your claim!

Edited August 24, 2015 by Exegesisme

[-1=e^ipi]

Sorry if I offended you. But I am concerned. I know people in my life that have schizophrenia.

[WIP]

I've stumbled onto the idea simply by looking at the univers in a purely logical fashion.

Bad idea! Because physicists refer to our everyday world that works by our concepts of logic as the realm of "middle dimensions." At the very smallest scales, virtual particles can transfer forces through space as they pop in/and out of existence, an electron will jump up or drop down to a new orbit around a nucleus of protons and neutrons by rules of probability that cannot be determined in advance, two particles can be separated by great distance and still become "entangled." And it's no better at the grand scale where gravity curves spacetime so that light from a star hidden behind another star can be seen; time slows down, objects take on greater mass and shorten as they accelerate closer to the speed of light. Isaac Newton went about as far as you can take physics by using our rules of logic. The rules modern physicists work by, only make sense mathematically.

[Freddy]

Bad idea! Because physicists refer to our everyday world that works by our concepts of logic as the realm of "middle dimensions." At the very smallest scales, virtual particles can transfer forces through space as they pop in/and out of existence, an electron will jump up or drop down to a new orbit around a nucleus of protons and neutrons by rules of probability that cannot be determined in advance, two particles can be separated by great distance and still become "entangled." And it's no better at the grand scale where gravity curves spacetime so that light from a star hidden behind another star can be seen; time slows down, objects take on greater mass and shorten as they accelerate closer to the speed of light. Isaac Newton went about as far as you can take physics by using our rules of logic. The rules modern physicists work by, only make sense mathematically.

I don't expect them to make many great progress in my lifetime then.

[Exegesisme]

Bad idea! Because physicists refer to our everyday world that works by our concepts of logic as the realm of "middle dimensions." At the very smallest scales, virtual particles can transfer forces through space as they pop in/and out of existence, an electron will jump up or drop down to a new orbit around a nucleus of protons and neutrons by rules of probability that cannot be determined in advance, two particles can be separated by great distance and still become "entangled." And it's no better at the grand scale where gravity curves spacetime so that light from a star hidden behind another star can be seen; time slows down, objects take on greater mass and shorten as they accelerate closer to the speed of light. Isaac Newton went about as far as you can take physics by using our rules of logic. The rules modern physicists work by, only make sense mathematically.

All you describe is something in a curved four-dimensional space-time, which is only on the surface of a five-dimensional space-time-gravity. In the five-dimensional space-time-gravity, the phenomena based on the curved four-dimensional will be reshaped, and all the five dimensions are straight again.

Edited August 24, 2015 by Exegesisme