Terrorist Kills 6 in Philadelphia

[Derek 2.0]

So (to use your own logic and line of questioning) you're saying that there was not a significant population of pro-Union loyalists in Belfast, and that the Provos were being supported from Sandy Row, and that nobody wanted the British in Belfast?

It'll be interesting to see how you handle your own brand of shabby reasoning.

I of course never suggested there were no Loyalists within Belfast, nor Ulster as a whole, having clearly acknowledged the sectarian nature of the conflict, likewise the scope of violence found within Belfast ......so I fail to see how you would apply the logic I used on your unfounded claims, in your above disjointed hypothetical....

[Moonbox]

I of course never suggested there were no Loyalists within Belfast, nor Ulster as a whole, having clearly acknowledged the sectarian nature of the conflict, likewise the scope of violence found within Belfast

just as I never suggested the British were wanted in New Lodge or other provo communities, despite your numerous attempts to imply otherwise. Funny.

......so I fail to see how you would apply the logic I used on your unfounded claims, in your above disjointed hypothetical....

It's was a red herring Derek. My disjointed hypothetical was an exact copy of your own. The inadequacies of your perspective are made painfully clear when you can call identically structured statements 'logic' when they're written by you and "disjointed" when they're not. What's especially funny is how your saying you used your "logic" on my unfounded claim, when the picture above clearly confirms my claim that the British were were wanted in Belfast.

I'll leave you the last word, as you say. I'll also actually do it too! As usual, your special combination of self-professed expertise and logical gymnastics has been entertaining.

Edited January 3, 2015 by Moonbox

[Derek 2.0]

just as I never suggested the British were wanted in New Lodge or other provo communities, despite your numerous attempts to imply otherwise. Funny.

Despite your saying so.......funny indeed

It's was a red herring Derek. My disjointed hypothetical was an exact copy of your own. The inadequacies of your perspective are made painfully clear when you can call identically structured statements 'logic' when they're written by you and "disjointed" when they're not. What's especially funny is how your saying you used your "logic" on my unfounded claim, when the picture above clearly confirms my claim that the British were were wanted in Belfast.

No....it wasn't, you see, mine was based on actual historic fact..........yours on fantasy, after your facts proved wanting.....

I'll leave you the last word, as you say. I'll also actually do it too! As usual, your special combination of self-professed expertise and logical gymnastics has been entertaining.

Glad you felt that way......inversely your wikipedia regurgitations are improving in both reply and timeliness, improving your ability to teach me that of which I already know.