waldo Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 Or sterilization. Don't forget sterilization. I'm good with either. alrightee! You acknowledge the problem... you believe the problem can be solved. Your previous solution was to have countries shift away from fossil-fuels to nuclear. Notwithstanding you've never qualified the type of nuclear you're advocating for, let's give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest that you're a genuine forward thinker and that you're in good company! ... so-called "next gen" nuclear (i.e. "safe nuclear") - the silver bullet panacea!!! In other MLW threads, several times now, I've mentioned Hansen's relatively long-standing position advocating 4th gen nuclear... that world nations should plow monies into 4th gen R&D. Hey I'm on-board, I've said so. However, that doesn't presume on a quick fix remedy/solution being found, if ever... and accepted/deployed; that doesn't presume on an interim do nothing approach to reduce reliance on fossil-fuels through existing alternative energy approaches (approaches that, in themselves, will also continue to refine, to develop). in the interim... waiting for your presumed (fantasized?) shifts to nuclear, existing or future gen, it's quite telling that you'd advocate for massive world-wide forced sterilization over anything that might mess with fossil-fuel use/reliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.