Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

How the libs alway get special treatment from election canada , what a sham. Just imagine if these 4 were conservative,they would be out for blood. What is taking so long, they must figure in time it will be all forgotton about. I guess the 3.1 bil they lost will never be paid back either , or the millions they owe for their scandals.

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/07/30/four-2006-liberal-leadership-candidates-who-still-owe-a-combined-400k-wont-be-taken-to-court-by-elections-canada/

Edited by PIK

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Elections Canada's double standard is appalling. They go on witch-hunts against Conservatives who are following the letter of the law, yet allow Liberals to openly flaunt their infractions.

Posted

No surprise there. Of course it's the conservatives fault doncha know cos 'the laws are not enforceable' sure...

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted

They should pay back the money but E.C. is no longer pursuing the issue... ergo - they are not paying it back.

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted (edited)

Should have figured our first two repondants wouldnt read the article linked, but instead suggest faux outrage and mislead those of us who also didnt read it.But then I did.

Cuz ya know....

The commissioner has concluded that the Act, as currently drafted, lacks sufficient clarity to support enforcement action in the criminal courts with respect to loans or claims that remain unpaid following the expiry of an extension,” Elections Canada said in a statement.

“Therefore, no enforcement action can be taken against the leadership contestants in relation to their unpaid debts.”

Should they pay it back? Of course they should. No question, and certainly they are being told that they should by the Chair of EC...

Regardless of his ruling, Cote urged the candidates to pay back the owed money out of respect for the spirit of the law.

“Despite the difficulties in enforcing the (Canada Elections Act), I believe it is clear that Parliament intended that leadership contestants act diligently to repay their campaign expenses,” said Cote.

“I strongly encourage the contestants involved to make every effort to raise funds through individual contributions, repay all outstanding debts and report all transactions to Elections Canada.”

The Tories introduced legislation in November 2011 designed to fix problems that chief electoral officer Marc Mayrand has said render the Canada Elections Act incoherent and ineffective.

But the proposed law has never been passed — something the Liberals say needs to happen.

Whats that Paul Harvey saying again? Edited by Guyser2
Posted

Well, there is a way, take so much from their pensions.

You should Chair the EC then.

The actual chair, the one with the intelligence to make the call said...."Therefore, no enforcement action can be taken against the leadership contestants in relation to their unpaid debts.”

You go and do it then.

Posted

Actually 'tis a puzzlement because the Elections Act says that if you break financing rules you can be subject to a $1,000 fine or three months imprisonment. Guess E.C. has their own interpretation depending on who’s breaking the law.

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted

Should have figured our first two repondants wouldnt read the article linked, but instead suggest faux outrage and mislead those of us who also didnt read it.But then I did.

Cuz ya know....

Should they pay it back? Of course they should. No question, and certainly they are being told that they should by the Chair of EC...

Whats that Paul Harvey saying again?

They owe the money plain and simple what don't you understand about that.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

They owe the money plain and simple what don't you understand about that.

I wrote in plain english, what dont you understand about that....and in particular when I wrote (and you quoted :rolleyes: ) "Should they pay it back? Of course they should. No question'

Posted

In this thread: Conservative trolling.

A non sequitur. Your definition of a troll is obviously someone with whom you disagree.

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Gtechalax earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Canadaisintrouble earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • AlizyMalik earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...