WWWTT Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Here's another picture of many people's opinion! Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
WWWTT Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Oh and here's another one about how Thatcher and her policy was all hypocrisy! Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
Guest Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 I wonder how much of that is being spent on security. Just think, if nobody protested, they could give it to the unemployed. Quote
g_bambino Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Oh and here's another one about how Thatcher and her policy was all hypocrisy! Her policy.... By what process did Thatcher, when prime minister, reserve Crown money for her future funeral? How did she know when she'd die? How did she know she'd get a ceremonial funeral? How was it all kept secret for so long? How.... On second thought, a better question would be: Why am I even bothering to ask you? Quote
g_bambino Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) Isn't WWWTT just spamming this thread with links and pictures now? (It's all quite reminiscent of betsy and her Bible links.) [ed.: sp.] Edited April 13, 2013 by g_bambino Quote
Signals.Cpl Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Oh and here's another one about how Thatcher and her policy was all hypocrisy! You must have been livid when the government wasted taxpayers money on the completely undeserved state funeral of Jack Layton... wait let me guess, you will reply with "take it up with the conservatives" right? Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
WWWTT Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Here's another good link I found For now, consider this a caution: if anyone tells you that Thatcher saved the British economy, you should ask why the results of that salvation took so very long to materialize,” Krugman writes. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/09/paul-krugman-margaret-thatcher_n_3043866.html#slide=1443358 WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
WWWTT Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Isn't WWWTT just spamming this thread with links and pictures now? (It's all quite reminiscent of betsy and her Bible links.) [ed.: sp.] Your more than welcome to start providing links defending Thatcher! WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
The_Squid Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Isn't WWWTT just spamming this thread with links and pictures now? (It's all quite reminiscent of betsy and her Bible links.) [ed.: sp.] You are correct. It is just nonsensical SPAM. Quote
Signals.Cpl Posted April 13, 2013 Report Posted April 13, 2013 Your more than welcome to start providing links defending Thatcher! WWWTT Some people deal with facts and opinion, you deal with someone else's opinion poorly disguised as a fact and then you avoid answering anything by simply throwing around more pretty little pictures that someone else thought up. Seems to me you would have no opinion on the issue if it wasn't for google... Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
WWWTT Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 I wonder how much of that is being spent on security. Just think, if nobody protested, they could give it to the unemployed. Probably a lot more spent on security than when Chavez died! Imagine how much they would have saved on security if Thatcher actually had good policy! WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
WWWTT Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 You are correct. It is just nonsensical SPAM. Ever wondered why there is so much material out there about Thatcher? Trying to stop the messenger does not stop the reality of the growing dissatisfaction of right wing policy. Everything I post is in direct relation to this thread and fits into the context of the debate (I at least try to keep it that way but sometimes may slip) WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
Signals.Cpl Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Probably a lot more spent on security than when Chavez died! Imagine how much they would have saved on security if Thatcher actually had good policy! WWWTT Everything you have posted in this thread has been disproven and you have given up defending the opinions you googled in favour of posting more opinions that you don't understand... thats all we need to know. And if you are going to make a statement about security cost have some facts to back it up, and by facts I mean something solid rather than posting an opinion of someone you don't know an opinion you found by most likely googling "Margaret Thatcher Bad point"... You don't know anything about Margaret Thatcher or her policies and therefore I have come to the conclusion that you hate her not because of any action she took as an MP or as a PM but because she was a conservative... you can't even dislike someone for the right reasons. Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
Signals.Cpl Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Ever wondered why there is so much material out there about Thatcher? Trying to stop the messenger does not stop the reality of the growing dissatisfaction of right wing policy. Everything I post is in direct relation to this thread and fits into the context of the debate (I at least try to keep it that way but sometimes may slip) WWWTT Funny, you can't debate to save your life... otherwise you would have posted something that was not so easily torn apart. Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
WWWTT Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Everything you have posted in this thread has been disproven and you have given up defending the opinions you googled in favour of posting more opinions that you don't understand... thats all we need to know. And if you are going to make a statement about security cost have some facts to back it up, and by facts I mean something solid rather than posting an opinion of someone you don't know an opinion you found by most likely googling "Margaret Thatcher Bad point"... You don't know anything about Margaret Thatcher or her policies and therefore I have come to the conclusion that you hate her not because of any action she took as an MP or as a PM but because she was a conservative... you can't even dislike someone for the right reasons. And this coming from someone whom has not posting anything to defend Thatcher! Kind of harsh to write that I hate someone that I do not even know. WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
WWWTT Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Funny, you can't debate to save your life... otherwise you would have posted something that was not so easily torn apart. Ahh,so now you feel that you must attack the poster. WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
Guest American Woman Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Isn't WWWTT just spamming this thread with links and pictures now? (It's all quite reminiscent of betsy and her Bible links.) [ed.: sp.] In light of the fact that when one responds to said posts he says "I didn't say that, the picture did!" - I'd say yes. We're supposed to carry on a discussion with a picture?? If the poster posting the pic won't even take responsibility for the view being expressed, if they won't even respond to responses to what's said in the pic, then it is nothing but spam; it's certainly not "promoting discussion." Quote
WWWTT Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 (edited) In light of the fact that when one responds to said posts he says "I didn't say that, the picture did!" - I'd say yes. We're supposed to carry on a discussion with a picture?? If the poster posting the pic won't even take responsibility for the view being expressed, if they won't even respond to responses to what's said in the pic, then it is nothing but spam; it's certainly not "promoting discussion." Since when should anyone here take responsibility for quoting someone's else view??? I am clearly using links and pictures to defend my position. Furthermore I have been completely clear of my position. I will not degenerate into an argument/slander or name calling like some posters do! WWWTT Edited April 14, 2013 by WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
Signals.Cpl Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 And this coming from someone whom has not posting anything to defend Thatcher! Kind of harsh to write that I hate someone that I do not even know. WWWTT I don't need to defend anything Margaret Thatcher did or did not do, I poked holes in your comical opinion the opinions you googled.Everything you presented has been a lie to one degree or another but I cannot blame you for that since I doubt you have even the slightest understanding or knowledge of her actions and the reasons behind those actions since your position is obviously based on what you can quickly google. Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
Signals.Cpl Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Ahh,so now you feel that you must attack the poster. WWWTT Well nothing else left to say, you posted garbage and it was proven to be garbage now it is time to point out that you can't debate especially when using someone else's position, a position you don't really understand. Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
Signals.Cpl Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Since when should anyone here take responsibility for quoting someone's else view??? I am clearly using links and pictures to defend my position. Furthermore I have been completely clear of my position. I will not degenerate into an argument/slander or name calling like some posters do! WWWTT Defend your position? You have barely defended anything in your position that I challenged... but then again you post pictures you don't agree with to "defend" a position you don't really understand, at least thats how it looks. Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
WWWTT Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 I don't need to defend anything Margaret Thatcher did or did not do, Then why are you posting on this thread? WWWTT Quote Maple Leaf Web is now worth $720.00! Down over $1,500 in less than one year! Total fail of the moderation on this site! That reminds me, never ask Greg to be a business partner! NEVER!
Guest Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Another reason to hate Mrs. T. Will her evil ever cease? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-22143674 Quote
Signals.Cpl Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 Then why are you posting on this thread? WWWTT Because at one point in time I took you seriously but that diminishes with each and every day when you post stuff like this... you come to this thread and attack her only to have most if not all of your arguments destroyed and you refuse to defend them so you throw more pictures out there that apparently you don't agree with. I don't need to defend her actions because you have done such an incompetent job of attacking her and all your arguments have been destroyed at least twice and thus you refuse to defend the opinion you googled... Quote Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst
Guest American Woman Posted April 14, 2013 Report Posted April 14, 2013 (edited) Since when should anyone here take responsibility for quoting someone's else view??? Why are you quoting it if you don't agree with it?? If you don't agree with it, say so. Otherwise, the assumption, since you are quoting it, is that you agree with it. Duh. I am clearly using links and pictures to defend my position. So then you are using "someone else's view" to speak for you. Furthermore I have been completely clear of my position. Yes, and your pictures are part of that. I will not degenerate into an argument/slander or name calling like some posters do! Oh, puh-lease. Who do you think you are fooling? Edited April 14, 2013 by American Woman Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.