dre Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) What kind of updates are you expecting? Scientists discover that great flood was the result of dieties anger over sodomy. Thats what shes banking on Edited January 6, 2013 by dre Quote I question things because I am human. And call no one my father who's no closer than a stranger
g_bambino Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 It must be like watching cartoon re-runs, huh? You certainly are a living caricature; and repetitive, to boot. Quote
betsy Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) You certainly are a living caricature; and repetitive, to boot. Go read the topic, "What is a New Atheist." For those who can comprehend, they'd see some new atheists in this topic. BTW speaking of that topic.....did we have, "anyone who breaks his long silence on the topic only to post a personal attack - directed at a religious person - without bothering to know what the on-going situation is all about," listed in that topic? Remind me to add that when I have more time. Thanks, Bambino for the inspiration! Edited January 6, 2013 by betsy Quote
betsy Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 Scientists discover that great flood was the result of dieties anger over sodomy. Dre: Thats what shes banking on How can you even think that???? Unless, of course, if science decides to finally take into serious consideration and not exclude the supernatural! Quote
betsy Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) Women are the creators, so my God created your God. Logical fallacy - proving some elements of the bible are historically somewhat accurate doesn't prove the historicity of the bible. Showing ruins existed of a city mentioned in the bible doesn't mean all the stories the bible sets in that city actually occurred. Showing there was a flood in the middle east doesn't prove the accuracy of the Noah and the Ark story. The presence of the Sea of Galilee doesn't prove that Jesus walked across it unless it was subjected to unusually cold temperatures during that time. Women are the creators, so my God created your God. But my God created your woman! Thank God He created woman at all! He could just as easily have decided that man doesn't need any woman. The "evolved" chimps could have sufficed as companions to your man! Or is it the un-evolved chimps....since man is supposed to have been evolved already?? Anyway, the way evolutionists see it - all animals are kins! So, an ape...an orangutang...or (I hope I don't offend the animals I don't mean to be politically incorrect), or any "types" will definitely do! Maybe the sin of sodomy takes on a whole new meaning!!! Like, your man goes for a male chimp instead! And you bring up LOGICAL FALLACY? Anyway, who is your god btw? Edited January 6, 2013 by betsy Quote
betsy Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) Sleipnir, on 05 January 2013 - 02:45 PM, said: What kind of updates are you expecting? Feeling anxious already? What do we expect from archeology? Edited January 6, 2013 by betsy Quote
betsy Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) Speaking of archeology.... When Mighty AC said that: Gravity would still exist without man, though the bible would not. My response was, yes it will still exists long after man is gone. Why? The bibles will be one of the many physical or material remains of man. What more since (as of year 2002), there are more than 6 billions copies of the Bible sold....well you can be sure that the archeological discovery of the Bible by the next inhabitants of this planet (if ever) will be so common! It'll be like finding arrowheads....except perhaps more! Edited January 6, 2013 by betsy Quote
Canuckistani Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 But my God created your woman! Thank God He created woman at all! He could just as easily have decided that man doesn't need any woman. The "evolved" chimps could have sufficed as companions to your man! Or is it the un-evolved chimps....since man is supposed to have been evolved already?? Anyway, the way evolutionists see it - all animals are kins! So, an ape...an orangutang...or (I hope I don't offend the animals I don't mean to be politically incorrect), or any "types" will definitely do! Maybe the sin of sodomy takes on a whole new meaning!!! Like, your man goes for a male chimp instead! And you bring up LOGICAL FALLACY? Anyway, who is your god btw? Her name is Ethyl. Quote
Sleipnir Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 Unless, of course, if science decides to finally take into serious consideration and not exclude the supernatural! Which will never happens because science constantly dispute supernatural entities and phenomenon. Quote "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain
Canuckistani Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 Which will never happens because science constantly dispute supernatural entities and phenomenon. By definition science only deals with the natural. Things that might have seemed supernatural at one time might come to have a scientific explanation, but science can not deal with what is "super' to nature. Science is about nature. This is the mistake many people make, trying to conflate the two. Science is a very limited enterprise, but that is what gives it its power. Try to dilute it and you just get an ineffective mess. Quote
g_bambino Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) Go read the topic, "What is a New Atheist." [D]id we have, "anyone who breaks his long silence on the topic only to post a personal attack - directed at a religious person - without bothering to know what the on-going situation is all about," listed...? Says the person who uses "atheist" as a pejorative and directs it at persons she's entiteled herself to deem as "atheist" without bothering to know what the ongoing situation is all about. Your bumbling foolery is more entertaining than any Looney Tunes bit. [ed.: sp] Edited January 6, 2013 by g_bambino Quote
g_bambino Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 Things that might have seemed supernatural at one time might come to have a scientific explanation, but science can not deal with what is "super' to nature. Science is about nature. Perhaps what he means, then, is that science has often ended phenomena's supernatural status in the human mind by explaining how those phenomena were actually part of the natural universe. Quote
Canuckistani Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 Perhaps what he means, then, is that science has often ended phenomena's supernatural status in the human mind by explaining how those phenomena were actually part of the natural universe. Yes, I misquoted and meant to reply to Betsy. Quote
betsy Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 Which will never happens because science constantly dispute supernatural entities and phenomenon. You're barking at the wrong tree! Explain that to Dre! Quote
betsy Posted January 6, 2013 Author Report Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) Yes, I misquoted and meant to reply to Betsy. WHY??? What's your explanation got to do with me? Call it divine providence that you misquoted....otherwise you'd be sitting on the same lilypad as sleipnir! By definition science only deals with the natural. Things that might have seemed supernatural at one time might come to have a scientific explanation, but science can not deal with what is "super' to nature. Science is about nature. This is the mistake many people make, trying to conflate the two. Science is a very limited enterprise, but that is what gives it its power. Try to dilute it and you just get an ineffective mess. Explain that to Dre, too. She talks about archeology discovering that deities' wrath caused the great flood! I've been trying to explain what archeology is all about - discovering physical/material remains left behind. Dre seems to be struggling with that - she'll probably listen to you more. And if you can take what looks like a terribly confused Sleipnir along with you on your way to Dre....that would be great. Edited January 6, 2013 by betsy Quote
GostHacked Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 Explain that to Dre, too. She talks about archeology discovering that deities' wrath caused the great flood! I've been trying to explain what archeology is all about - discovering physical/material remains left behind. Dre seems to be struggling with that - she'll probably listen to you more. And if you can take what looks like a terribly confused Sleipnir along with you....that would be great. I think you are the most confused, and not the others you have mentioned. Quote
Sleipnir Posted January 6, 2013 Report Posted January 6, 2013 You're barking at the wrong tree! Explain that to Dre! Whose Dre? Quote "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain
Sleipnir Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 Quote "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain
Mighty AC Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 Ha ha...to a believer even that's not a stretch. Quote "Our lives begin to end the day we stay silent about the things that matter." - Martin Luther King Jr"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire
Canuckistani Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 When believers can say that God buried dinosaur bones in strata that appear to be millions of years old to test their faith, you know they can swallow anything. Quote
Sleipnir Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 When believers can say that God buried dinosaur bones in strata that appear to be millions of years old to test their faith, you know they can swallow anything. Except the truth. Quote "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain
Guest Manny Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 Didnt see that one mentioned. Maybe you guys watch too much TV. Quote
jbg Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 This thread is hilarious. It's like watching kids who don't know how to count past 10 trying to debate about long division. I would like someone to explain, if there were only two of every animal on the Ark how we don't have worse inbreeding than the Hapsburg Family that were the emperors in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jbg Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 (edited) Deleted Edited January 7, 2013 by jbg Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jbg Posted January 7, 2013 Report Posted January 7, 2013 It must be like watching cartoon re-runs, huh? I'm not sure who's more the child in this debate. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.