Iraq connection

[Bro]

I have heard many politically correct people state that the US invasion of Iraq was a pre-emptive attack by the US.

I have to disagree.

When the desert storm operation concluded,saddam promised "the mother of all wars".Shortly thereafter,the first attack on the world trade center occured,thanks to bin laden.In my uneducated non left view of things,it seems to me that bin laden is just a hired mercenary paid for by the saddam regime. The reason I post this in Canadian politics sight is that I believe many of the operations[ money gathering ],by saddam and bin laden,are conducted by and through an unsuspecting

Canadian populace,but by a very much enlightened liberal government.I really do not trust the liberals anymore,and their hidden agendas will soon come to light,with many Canadians regretting that they ever voted for them.

[Bro]

Where are you leftie supporters to defend your sacred liberal party?I would like one of you to at least tell me I am just writing nonsense.

[caesar]

Bro; Do you never listen to the news???? Even bush knows that Saddam and bin laden were neither friends nor cohorts. Read and research don't day dream and make excuses

[Bro]

I don't daydream,and as far as the news goes,which politically affiliated broadcast do you believe?In my case,I call them as I see them,and you better believe there is a connection between bin and saddam.Check the time frame of terrorist actions,it is played out like clock work.

If you as many people do,believe what your favourite network or political party has to say,then yes,the obvious will elude you.

[Bro]

I'm surprised this topic did not garner any further discussion.

Does this mean Canada is completely safe from terrorism,because maybe with our lax immigration and refugee policies a lot of wanna be terrorists use Canada as a stepping stone to help guide them to another terror attack on NA.

[Guest eureka]

Did you mean not to have a comma between uneducated and non leftie?

[Bro]

LOL,yes,that is really the important issue to discuss,whether or not I put a comma between two words,sso, important.Funny you picked out the words"uneducated"and "leftie"as points of interest,along with my terrible lack of comma use.

I think in my slow thought processes,that I was just insulted,or do you really think uneducated and leftie really

should have no division of any kind,even a comma.

P.S.I spelt sso, this way, on purpose,sso please don't correct me,it was meant to stress the importance of your observations.

[caesar]

Bro; it has been discussed to death. You are behind the times. You don't believe the facts that even the American Congress has recognized. The invasion of Iraq was based on faulty, fraudulent, forged information. That is a fact not an opinion.

Canada made the right choice.

[Bro]

.

Canada made the right choice.

Way too early in this game to make a call like that.

We're a snake eyes roll from the beginning of this new terrorism infested world.

I would have liked Canada to put forth a stronger stance against terrorism,more so than the method we currently support,which is to allow terrorists to claim refugee status in Canada,while calling the Americans morons by trying to protect the nation they have built.

[The Terrible Sweal]

I have heard many politically correct people state that the US invasion of Iraq was a pre-emptive attack by the US.

I have to disagree.

When the desert storm operation concluded,saddam promised "the mother of all wars".Shortly thereafter,the first attack on the world trade center occured,thanks to bin laden.In my uneducated non left view of things,it seems to me that bin laden is just a hired mercenary paid for by the saddam regime.

It's amazing that you call your opinion 'undeducated', but nevertheless persist in it.

Why not educate yourself instead? The congressional 9/11 commission concurred with virtually everyone else that there were no substantive linkages between Iraq and al Quada.

Disagreeing with this is your prerogative, but why should anyone pay any attention to it when you admit it is based purely on ignorance? Why are you wasting our time?

[Black Dog]

I would have liked Canada to put forth a stronger stance against terrorism,more so than the method we currently support,which is to allow terrorists to claim refugee status in Canada,while calling the Americans morons by trying to protect the nation they have built.

First, can you give any evidence that Canada harbours terrorists by gioving them refugee status? Give me one example. Just one.

Interestingly, all of the 9-11 atackers made it through the U.S.legitimately (including the three whose entry visas came through special US-Saudi "Visa Express" program).

And gee, and it's not like the U.S. harbours terrorists (like Cuban exile Orlando Bosch, who was pardoned by Bush 1, despite having blown up a Cuban jetliner in 1976, killing all on board).

Why, between these misconceptions and your persistant belief in a bin Laden/Saddam connection (despite a total lack of evidence and a disavowal of such a link by U.S. officials), it appears you don't really know what your on about.

[Bro]

amazing that you call your opinion 'undeducated', but nevertheless persist in it.

That was just a bit of sarcasm that I know you fully picked up,but chose to attack me on the issue of ignorance instead.

Is a congressional report something you always believe?

That means there were republicans involved,and you don't obviously agree with them.

[Bro]

Why, between these misconceptions and your persistant belief in a bin Laden/Saddam connection (despite a total lack of evidence and a disavowal of such a link by U.S. officials), it appears you don't really know what your on about.

Unlike yourself,I tend to read more than one point of view,and usually read more than just the headlines.When you want the real truth,you have to look for it in other places other than page 1 of your local paper.

Other knowledge I gather is by talking to people,not trying to make out they are ignorant because I agree or disagree with them,much unlike yourself.

Anyways,continue with your narrow mindedness,and ignore all which you consider below your intelligence level.

Common sense ,as in your case and many,many others, does not necessarily accompany your level of intelligence,which you think is high,obviously.

Common sense will always solve problems quicker than

a lofty attitude,which usually comes with a person thinking they are more intelligent than they actually are.

[The Terrible Sweal]

amazing that you call your opinion 'undeducated', but nevertheless persist in it.

 

That was just a bit of sarcasm that I know you fully picked up,but chose to attack me on the issue of ignorance instead.

Is a congressional report something you always believe?

That means there were republicans involved,and you don't obviously agree with them.

True, I don't always believe congressional reports, but there is much more than just that to why I believe it this time:

1) the Bush regime claimed to know there were WMDs and refused to profer the evidence, turns out they had lied;

2) the Bush regime claimed to have evidence of al Queada connections, but they refused to proffer the evidence. Their lie in #1 detracts from their credibility here in #2.

3) no other credible source has tendered evidence of substantive al Quada connections.

4) politics-wise it made little sense to think that fundamentalist al Quaeda would be buddy-buddy with pinko Saddam.

[Black Dog]

Unlike yourself,I tend to read more than one point of view,and usually read more than just the headlines.When you want the real truth,you have to look for it in other places other than page 1 of your local paper.

Other knowledge I gather is by talking to people,not trying to make out they are ignorant because I agree or disagree with them,much unlike yourself.

Anyways,continue with your narrow mindedness,and ignore all which you consider below your intelligence level.

Common sense ,as in your case and many,many others, does not necessarily accompany your level of intelligence,which you think is high,obviously.

Common sense will always solve problems quicker than

a lofty attitude,which usually comes with a person thinking they are more intelligent than they actually are

What does this have to do with the facts that there's been no evidence of a Sddam/AQ connection?

Nor have you been able to back up your contention that Canada allows terrorists to claim refugee status.

It has nothing to do with intellectual snobbery. Given that you are either unwilling or unable to offer any evidence to support your arguments (beyond invoking "common sense", which is a complete contradiction), you can't expect to be taken very seriously on a discussion board or anywhere else for that matter.

That, my friend, is "common sense."