Jump to content

Bro

Member
  • Posts

    343
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bro

  1. If it's in the liberal charter,we must respect it.Has anyone bothered to check?
  2. He will be remembered as the one left to clean up the mess left by his nemisis[?],Jean Chretien.Maybe if the history books are good to him,they will claim he actually did not know what was going on while he was the finance minister in the Chretien regime.
  3. Should Paul Martin liberals fail to win upcoming election,which ex-Liberal members will once again be on the forefront of the great liberal machine?J. Manley,S.Copps etc.etc.,
  4. But looking back at what their party platform did for Ontario during the Harris& Eves Days,their cause is one we simply can not afford. Please,the rational for a statement like that.
  5. tougher gun laws The tougher gun laws ,mean tougher sentences,or an actual sentence,for anybody using a gun to commit a criminal act.It has nothing to do with the overpriced,and as yet ineffective, gun registry.I hope that clears up my statement.
  6. What a nice word.Most political parties claim they are very sincere about one or more of their party platforms.Let's see. Okay, boys and girls. The green party;sincere about the environment,no arguement there.The problem,wil put thousands of Canadians out of work. The Bloc;sincere about taking Quebec out of Canada,no argument there.Hope you don't agree. The Conservatives;sincere about lower taxes,getting tough on crime,free votes within the commons,choice for parents to choose the way they raise their children,tougher gun laws.Just a small list of their many positive options they are proposing to Canadian voters,many of which I could support. The Liberals;from what I can garner from their present campaign,more sincere actions of the last decade,broken promises,lies,deception and corruption. The ndp;sincere about more social programs,but looking back at what their party platform did for Ontario during the Rae Days,their cause is one we simply can not afford.
  7. Kiraly, go have a little sleep,then get on the program.
  8. Should the green party replace the bloc on national televised debates,because the greens represent more provinces than the 1 province the bloc represents? Or,is the bloc placed there by the liberals or the liberal media to take the focus off other Canadian issues,to once again set up a false sense of security that the liberals will keep Quebec within Canada?
  9. Yes, darn it, of course I am afraid of what MY Canada would become under a Harper govt. Anyone with any brains knows that he'd sell us off to the Americans. Bye bye Canada, hello 51st state. Hello,anyone home?With a historical low dollar set by the liberals,who do you think set up Canada for sale to the Americans?That is why the the liberals are pissed off with the Americans,they actually took advantage of the vulnerable position the liberals put us in.
  10. Certainly nobody in this present version of the liberal party.Not even Martin who was finance minister at the time.wink wink.The liberals would never deceive one of their own,it would not relate to their high ethics.wink wink.They would never put anybody of question in places of authority within their party,like members of the bloc,wink wink.And certainly they would not post one person of prime suspicion to be diplomat of Denmark,wink wink.Etc.,Etc.
  11. And of course, with these economic times, $200K doesnt go very far... most Canadians can really identify with that ... can't they.... Yes, we certainly can.My main problem though,we are lead to believe by the liberals they are the economic geniuses and our economy is second best to none. In some other countries,with a 200K income,you can live quite well.There seems to be a little discord here,please shed some light on this issue.
  12. Mr. Harper said he would allow a free vote ,for all MP's,if the issue was presented,a far more democratic procedure than was used by the liberal and ndp parties,who told their members to support it,even if they did not,or face back bench status,or even give up their post.Where is the representation of voters in a case such as this?Another example of the liberal and ndp party not allowing their elected members to vote on an issue with their own ideals or that of their constituents.
  13. A vote for the liberals in this election means you support corruption within the Canadian government.So either you are corrupt yourself,or your livelihood depends on a liberal win.If it is the latter,it is a very sad state of affairs when a corrupt government has enough power to force you to support their corruption in order for you to survive in a democratic country.
  14. Canadian soldiers being injured is a joke to you? What is your problem?
  15. According to our unbiased Canadian press,the most"pressing" items for our next election is the right for gays to call their union a marriage,in the same text used for heterosexual people,Quebec seperation,{again],and liberals trying to defend their fairness to tax payers over their last term.Yawn,Yawn,Yawn. Is it possible for Canadians to actually vote for a party that has the majority of Canadians and their well being in mind,instead of the current government who likes spending money now for future promised spending,which we rarely ever see come true anyway.Wake up little sleepy headed Canadians!
  16. It is amazing the liberals are carefully spending tax payer money into the year 2015,in regards to the child care platform,but in the last 12 years have totally mismanaged ,or lost,billions of dollars of tax payer money in other ventures,the gun registry,adscam,HRDC,etc,etc.,can they really be deserving of a vote?
  17. Three Canadian soldiers injured. Who is to blame? George Bush Taliban Paul Martin Steven Harper Saddam Hussein Palestinians Israelis Jack Layton Russians etc.Cast your vote
  18. You better get rid of whatever it is that is altering your thinking process,or stop listening to the cbc.
  19. ? And to be frank, anyone that doesn't have a grievance with the British government over the thousands of civilian deaths caused by this war is not human. I would hold liberal governments like ours more responsible for any deaths that have occured,because in not showing a united stance that terrorist actions will not be tolerated,they are allowed to continue their killing ,thinking that they do have support from a liberal government such as ours.Any vote of confidence for them,like Canada is giving them ,via the liberal party,will allow them to grow stronger and when Canada is hit,where will most Canadians go crying for help?You guessed it,the war mongering states and the puppet british.
  20. and the dollar - all are up or predicted to move that way. Right... Did you know it has always been liberal policy to keep our dollar low,is that why you voted for them as well? This just shows you are a true liberal,don'tknow what the hell you are talking about or what your party platforms are.lol.
  21. Once again the liberal party and their double standards prove they are in favor of public/private healthcare for themselves and the province of quebec,but in Ontario the situation is completely reversed.Dalton raised taxes for healthcare,yet improvements,still after a year,are yet to be observed.
  22. Nothing would surprise me coming from Martin and team. It would even surprise me if Martin were to name a francophone, separatist from Quebec to the post of G.G.. You hit the nail on the head.The liberals want the monarchy completely out of the picture,to hell with anglo traditions.Having a Lapierre type person in that office would enable them to kill it from within.The original plan was for ms. clarkson to spend extavagantly until a majority of Canadians would say it is costing too much in taxes,but the liberals forgot that as long as the liberal party is wasting tax money,most Canadians are willing to accept that fact.
  23. She is a very scary person to have as much power as she does.Even on talk radio ,the most staunch liberals were trying to distance her from the liberal party today.It kind of made my day.The only problem,most liberals ,those that are on the hill, will support her,something to do with the party whip or something like that. Hopefully,this will mean less public support for a party that continually sits on the fence,that is until the whiff of votes tells them which direction to go,whether that is from the some 36,000 deported immigrants they can't account for,or whatever injust group gives them money,or,well, the list goes on.
×
×
  • Create New...