Evening Star Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 NDP & LPC unleashed this Tory majority on Canada, its their responsibility to fix this Huh? Canadian voters unleashed the Tory majority on Canada. Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 um hold on if voter turn out is low why does the ndp website keep going down Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Boges Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 NDP & LPC unleashed this Tory majority on Canada, its their responsibility to fix this Really? You know that if the Bloc had won 50+ seats like they had in the past they'd be the opposition. The truth is the NDP doesn't have national appeal. Their support is Quebec and a few select urban areas and that's pretty much it. The major battleground is Ontario and that'll always be a battle between the LPC and the CPC. Quote
Boges Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 um hold on if voter turn out is low why does the ndp website keep going down I guess they hired crappy IT people. Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 Really? You know that if the Bloc had won 50+ seats like they had in the past they'd be the opposition. The truth is the NDP doesn't have national appeal. Their support is Quebec and a few select urban areas and that's pretty much it. The major battleground is Ontario and that'll always be a battle between the LPC and the CPC. was talking about the bringing down of the government for petty reasons Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Boges Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 (edited) Oh Noes!!!! Voting Investigation. If I was Brian Topp and I lewse I wouldn't concede, this is clearly a conspiracy to interfere with democracy. BTW just so you guise know, it doesn't matter who wins, this will be the story people talk about. NDP. Edited March 24, 2012 by Boges Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 This is the stuff Anonymous followers have done websites to crash it Its not difficult to do Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 BTW just so you guise know, it doesn't matter who wins, this will be the story people talk about. NDP. Yes it will but you're giddy about it now... later you'll be on the defensive when people start pointing at the conservatives Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Boges Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 Yes it will but you're giddy about it now... later you'll be on the defensive when people start pointing at the conservatives I guess you're right. The opposition has a track record of blaming the Conservatives for things they have absolutely no evidence to support. Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 Their system was attacked so the system automatically shut down uh oh Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Guest Derek L Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 Oh Noes!!!! Voting Investigation. If I was Brian Topp and I lewse I wouldn't concede, this is clearly a conspiracy to interfere with democracy. BTW just so you guise know, it doesn't matter who wins, this will be the story people talk about. NDP. I just tuned into CBC........What exactly happened with their voting system? Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 (edited) I just tuned into CBC........What exactly happened with their voting system? The voting system was designed to shut down if the number of voters (attempted in this case) exceeded the limit of ndp members like a fail safe. tampering was confirmed but the votes were not messed with Edited March 24, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Guest Derek L Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 The voting system was designed to shut down if the number of voters (attempted in this case) exceeded the limit of ndp members like a fail safe. tampering was confirmed but the votes were not messed with So NDP members were unable to vote online? Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 (edited) So NDP members were unable to vote online? Correct, which is why the hour long delays just proves voting online is a bad idea Edited March 24, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
cybercoma Posted March 24, 2012 Author Report Posted March 24, 2012 um hold on if voter turn out is low why does the ndp website keep going down Maybe your buddies over there at Anonymous are running DDoS attacks on the servers. Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 (edited) Maybe your buddies over there at Anonymous are running DDoS attacks on the servers. If they did they will announce they did within a day like they always do but i highly doubt it Edited March 24, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
j44 Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 (edited) The voting system was designed to shut down if the number of voters (attempted in this case) exceeded the limit of ndp members like a fail safe. tampering was confirmed but the votes were not messed with Was tampering really confirmed? This has been a mess. Watching NDP communications trying to explain why this happened w low turnout was amusing. They kept saying it was because there was higher turnout than expected. That's terrible spin. Edited March 24, 2012 by j44 Quote
Newfoundlander Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 Will Topp be to stubborn to give up if he finishes second on the third ballot and Mulcair has 47% or more? Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 Was tampering really confirmed? This has been a mess. Watching NDP communications trying to explain why this happened w low turnout was amusing. They kept saying it was because there was higher turnout than expected. That's terrible spin. yes. but all they did was try to slow it down, not get in Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Boges Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 yes. but all they did was try to slow it down, not get in And you believe them. Quote
j44 Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 yes. but all they did was try to slow it down, not get in God I was sitting around for hours with nothing really happening and I got out for 30 minutes and I miss this? lol On a scale of 1-10 how bad has this been for the party? It will obviously be a story tomorrow but how bad does it look? Rob Silver is pointing out on his twitter feed that considering they are picking a leader in one day with a one member one vote system it isn't going that bad. Andrew Coyne pointed out that they had 8 months to plan for this and that two votes took 8 hours. lol Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 And you believe them. believe what? It was a DDoS attack, they confirmed it on cbc that is what DDoS attacks do, delay delay delay Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 (edited) God I was sitting around for hours with nothing really happening and I got out for 30 minutes and I miss this? lol On a scale of 1-10 how bad has this been for the party? It will obviously be a story tomorrow but how bad does it look? Rob Silver is pointing out on his twitter feed that considering they are picking a leader in one day with a one member one vote system it isn't going that bad. Andrew Coyne pointed out that they had 8 months to plan for this and that two votes took 8 hours. lol LOL It isn't the NDPs fault or incompetence by the company they are using it just happens in the digital world .. which is why online voting is not a good idea Edited March 24, 2012 by stopstaaron Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Boges Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 This is the embarrassing thing for the dippers. http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1151442--ndp-leadership-high-voter-turnout-causes-delays-for-new-democrats-casting-ballots-online?bn=1 An apparently high voter turnout during the second round of voting at the leadership convention in Toronto is causing delays for New Democrats trying to cast their ballots online.The party responded to reports of members having trouble casting their ballots through the website by extending the second ballot period to 12:45 p.m. More than 131,000 NDP members are eligible to vote in the leadership contest and nearly 56,000 had already cast their preferential ballots in the advance polls that closed late Friday morning. So what would have happened if all 131,000 tried to vote if 50,000-70,000 people crash the system? Quote
stopstaaron Posted March 24, 2012 Report Posted March 24, 2012 @imarkhanlon: Cyber attack isolated to two IP addresses via @CTVNews #cdnpoli #NDPldr Quote Don't ban me bro. Oh behave, I'll behave. I'll be a good little boy.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.