cybercoma Posted March 17, 2012 Report Posted March 17, 2012 Ignoring is used by school girls and wusses. Feminine qualities are such a damnable thing, eh? Misogynist, line 1. Quote
Shady Posted March 18, 2012 Author Report Posted March 18, 2012 Typical hippy that can't stand to hear contrary opinions. Yep. Fits in perfectly with the survey I posted in another area. Anyways, more tax dollars at work. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHUKpHj9yZQ Quote
Jack Weber Posted March 18, 2012 Report Posted March 18, 2012 Doesn't fit CPCFTW's mould. Galton's wife was VERY unattractive. Hitler enjoyed his theories though! So did Lennin!!! Gotta love these humanitarians/Darwinists.... Quote The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
jacee Posted March 18, 2012 Report Posted March 18, 2012 No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that people are biologically wired to try to succeed to attract mates. As a woman, surely you can admit that a successful man is more attractive than poor one (or perhaps he was when you were between 16-30). And admitting that is not an admission of being a whore, despite Cybercoma's ridiculous notions! As a man under 30, I can tell you that I would not want to have children without being secure financially. What a whore I am! A couple that is financially successful will have the means to raise successful children in a capitalist society. omigod (Tries to make a straight face.) CPCFTW ... lol (Can't do it) lololol I'll try to make this simple for you: Only some men have to lure superficial women with money, because they have absolutely nothing else to offer (eg, character), and no chance with any but superficial women. Is that clear enough? Thanks for the laugh. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.