Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah, I think we should have just asked the bad men to pretty please be nice to everyone - problem solved.

<_<

Yes, I'm sure that's exactly what diplomacy entails.

Your argument is an over-simplification.

  • Replies 278
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Derek L
Posted

No, diplomacy is diplomacy...it's talking...it's not killing.

War is killing, war is violence.

Besides, diplomacy is more cost effective than war.

If you and I were on a deserted island, and their was only enough fresh food and water for one person, and I had my Colt 1911, how far would diplomacy take you?

Guest Derek L
Posted

I think we ought to have lots of armed forces equipment, and trained personnel.

But military power without diplomacy is a waste of blood, and treasure.

I got news for ya...with war-mongering you might win the battle, but without diplomacy, and looking after the bottom line, you'll lose the war.

As I’ve said before, tell that to the people of Carthage.

Posted

I think we ought to have lots of armed forces equipment, and trained personnel.

But that is still "profiteering"...who's gonna build the "equipment".

But military power without diplomacy is a waste of blood, and treasure.

Nothing I've stated precludes diplomacy.

I got news for ya...with war-mongering you might win the battle, but without diplomacy, and looking after the bottom line, you'll lose the war.

Either way, I know that with peace-mongering you will lose both.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Guest Derek L
Posted

"Warfare is politics by other means" - Clausewitz

You stayed in a Holiday Inn too? ;)

Guest American Woman
Posted

Yes, I'm sure that's exactly what diplomacy entails.

Your argument is an over-simplification.

My argument is an impossibility. <_<

We didn't go to war without trying diplomacy first while they didn't try talking to anyone before killing innocent civilians worldwide. But I'm curiouis. What, after all this time, do you think would have made them be 'nice?' What do you think it would have taken to make them happy with us? ie: pacify them?

Posted

The military will tell Government that to achieve their stated objectives they will require x.

Is military a branch of government?

Who do military lobbyists lobby?

How so? I need water and food to live (the requirement)......McDonalds can meet that requirement if I so choose.

Do fat people exist?

Guest Derek L
Posted

"Warfare should only be engaged in as a last resort" - me

“Those who beat their swords into plowshares usually end up plowing for those who didn't.” Ben Franklin

Guest Derek L
Posted

Is military a branch of government?

In Democracies yes.

Who do military lobbyists lobby?

Those with the control of the money.

Do fat people exist?

Sure they do. What's your point?

Posted

If you and I were on a deserted island, and their was only enough fresh food and water for one person, and I had my Colt 1911, how far would diplomacy take you?

We could negotiate a settlement that benefits us both.

Guest Derek L
Posted

We could negotiate a settlement that benefits us both.

Ok, Demonstrate your ability to negotiate with me:

There’s enough coconuts for one of us, I’m going to eat them and I’ll ensure that I eat them with my Colt .45ACP.

Negotiate away.

Posted

But that is still "profiteering"...who's gonna build the "equipment".

Profiting from the sale of a product is fine. Colluding to create the conditions that necessitate the contracts for building equipment is not fine.

Nothing I've stated precludes diplomacy.

"The best defense is a strong offense." (12:54pm)

Either way, I know that with peace-mongering you will lose both.

Explain.

Guest Derek L
Posted

Profiting from the sale of a product is fine. Colluding to create the conditions that necessitate the contracts for building equipment is not fine.

Where’s the collusion on Dassault’s part? Do they care if India uses their product for it’s intended purpose or not?

Posted

My argument is an impossibility. <_<

We didn't go to war without trying diplomacy first while they didn't try talking to anyone before killing innocent civilians worldwide. But I'm curiouis. What, after all this time, do you think would have made them be 'nice?' What do you think it would have taken to make them happy with us? ie: pacify them?

Who's "they"?

Made who "be nice"?

"Make" them happy with us?

People are generally "happy" with you when you leave them alone.

Guest American Woman
Posted (edited)

We could negotiate a settlement that benefits us both.

Then allow me to repeat:

We didn't go to war without trying diplomacy first while they didn't try talking to anyone before killing innocent civilians worldwide. But I'm curiouis. What, after all this time, do you think would have made them be 'nice?' What do you think it would have taken to make them happy with us? ie: pacify them?

Edited to add: I see you can't answer the questions. Just as I thought. But allow me to address your questions:

Who's "they"?

Made who "be nice"?

"Make" them happy with us?

People are generally "happy" with you when you leave them alone.

You suggest we negotiate and you don't even know with who??

People are "generally" decent too, but sometimes there are exceptions to that rule, eh?

Edited by American Woman
Posted

Profiting from the sale of a product is fine. Colluding to create the conditions that necessitate the contracts for building equipment is not fine.

Governments can create such conditions without any such collusion. War powers nationalize entire industries.

"The best defense is a strong offense." (12:54pm)

Still doesn't preclude diplomacy. The biggest military on this planet also has the most number of embassies/consulates and State Department.

Explain.

Your pacifist/isolationist position guarantees the erosion of economic and political sovereignty. Peace at what price?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Guest Derek L
Posted

"Making war for the sake of war is a waste of time, money, and lives." - me

What happened to our coconut negotiations?

They all fall to ball I suppose.......

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...